Gold Volatility Breeds Equity Opportunities: Mike Niehuser

Michael Niehuser Volatility in the markets isn’t going away any time soon and Mike Niehuser, founder of Beacon Rock Research, expects 2012 to be a year of extreme swings. Niehuser draws parallels to the beginning of 2009, which was a short period of time that produced some very high returns. In this exclusive Gold Report interview, Niehuser shares his market outlook and names a host of companies that are positioned to take off.

The Gold Report: What was your prediction for gold prices in 2011 and how did last year’s investment ideas work out?

Mike Niehuser: Depending on how you want to spin it, we were a little conservative in some respects, but for year-end 2011, we nearly hit it right on the nose. Our forecast for 2011 included the price of gold ranging from $1,300/ounce (oz) to $1,500/oz with the potential with some catalyst to go over $1,600/oz by year-end. In reality, gold traded up to $1,500/oz for the first half of the year making us look smart, then exploded to $1,900/oz and retreated back to where we thought we would end up at year-end at $1,600/oz.

So very close on price, but, more important, we missed the mark on the catalyst, which is the story of the year. We thought the catalyst would be the accelerating deterioration of the U.S. dollar in combination with typical seasonal demand late in the year, but this was blown out by the debt crisis in both the U.S. and Europe, with a wildly different impact on metal and stock prices. Understanding the difference could be very important to making it through 2012.

TGR: What difference are you referring to?

MN: As the U.S. dominates the world’s media, those in the U.S. see the world from a closed system. We know closed systems become more unstable over time. The result is that news media can move into hyper drive, which is what happened with the debt ceiling fiasco last summer. This is especially the case where politics are concerned. In reality with the U.S. dollar’s role as the world reserve currency, the debt is not an issue so long as foreigners are willing to accept dollars or treasuries on the cheap, and we can continue to kick the can down the road almost indefinitely.

The timing of our new-found austerity came at the wrong time with Europeans dealing with their own austerity issues. It would appear that the combination sparked fears of global currency devaluation sending gold and silver to record levels. As the U.S. economy improved, debt as an issue moved off the front page. The issue did not subside in Europe and the U.S. dollar remained strong relative to the euro, leading to a relative decline in interest rates, gold and, consequently, mining equities. I really thought 2011 had the potential to look like 2010 for mining stocks, but it really started to look like 2008, which led to the best buying opportunity of a lifetime in the first quarter of 2009.

TGR: So what are you seeing for metal prices and mining stocks in the coming year?

MN: The old adage that the only constant was volatility is no longer a cliché. While the U.S. economy is showing strength and the U.S. dollar is strong, there has never been more uncertainty in my lifetime; 2012 could be a very volatile year to the extremes. I was born just prior to the Cuban Missile Crisis, but holding catalysts for volatility constant, which is a bit absurd to even suggest, we would expect gold to trade over a wider range and higher than the prior year, say between $1,400–1,700/oz with the potential for some catalyst for the upside to $1,800/oz or $1,900/oz. Demand destruction by higher gold prices may have upset seasonal factors for good and there may be any number of catalysts that may impact prices almost at any time.

TGR: So what kind of catalyst are you looking for?

MN: Well, it’s not any one catalyst, but it is the unperceived impact of any particular catalyst on a potentially unrelated event. Not only the type and relationship of the catalyst but also the timing is important. Working backwards from Dec. 21, 2012, the end of the world by the Mayan calendar, we have a national election in the U.S.; certainly by some timetables Iran is predicted to have a nuclear weapon at some advanced stage of development; and I believe Greece has some event in the month of March. On top of this we are likely to see more political grandstanding early in 2012 on any number of issues including extension of the payroll tax cuts, unemployment benefits and, of course, the federal debt ceiling. Not to be facetious but we will also have the Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke committing to more frequent press conferences in the name of transparency. Among the international or political challenges of 2012, the Federal Reserve may touch on more of these than you might imagine.

TGR: Are you not giving the Federal Reserve too much credit in world affairs?

MN: Certainly not if the U.S. dollar is the world’s reserve currency. Originally the Fed was charged with the mission as an economic stabilizer to provide an elastic currency in times of financial panic and a lender of last resort for failing banks. The Fed has since suffered mission creep and is now charged with maintaining full employment and, most recently, reduction of systematic risk. One can argue that with banks getting bigger since 2008, the potential for moral hazard has, in fact, increased with larger banks still too big to fail. This may be chump change. Bernanke has said he has no exposure to Europe, but it is apparent that through “temporary U.S. dollar liquidity swaps,” the Fed now may, in effect, have become a global lender of last resort. Systematic risk domestically and globally may be assured. Once again, put it on the credit card.

TGR: Do you think there is a chance that the Fed may accommodate another stimulus program since this is an election year?

MN: This is rather doubtful considering the need has gone away with the stabilization in the U.S. economy. But given the mission of the Fed to pursue full employment, forgetting a moderating unemployment rate, there are still over 10 million unemployed, and millions more under-employed, and they vote. It is interesting that with changes in the voting members at the Fed that there will be fewer stimulus hawks. Sort of like a football team losing their defensive line. Another stimulus program, even talk of one, would be a huge catalyst. Even without a stimulus, the Fed holding short-rate interest rates near zero for the foreseeable future is damaging to a functioning economy in allocating investments. With zero interest rates, basically price controls, funds flow to non-productive assets like gold and other tangibles or consumables rather than fixed assets and equipment for some future return. This also encourages our consumer-driven economy, which is spend now, save later, or better yet pass the buck and kick the can. In any event, we know how well this worked in the last decade.

TGR: It would appear that all that uncertainty should be pretty good for gold?

MN: In the long run, it is without doubt bullish for gold. It is unavoidable but it may take a very long time. Remember that the late Roman Empire was financed through the gradual salting of freshly minted coins with base metals. This is not much different than deficit spending and transfer payments from taxpayers to the entitled or government salaries and pensions. Saving and investment is punished while spending and consuming is encouraged. In the short term, should interest rates increase either by the Fed in the short end or the market requiring higher yields on longer maturities, positive real interest rates could erase gains in metal prices. This seems to be impossible. More likely, as the president has now used a recess appointment for the new head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the financial markets now have an unvetted regulator in a new bureau accountable only to an independent Federal Reserve. Bankers are risk averse and primarily wish to protect their jobs. I have heard it from bankers’ mouths, you won’t see lending until they know they have a job. So even with near zero interest rates—negative real rates—a sluggish economy will hold down inflation and with a strong U.S. dollar, gold could have a tough time in the new year.

TGR: So with gold trading over such a wide range are you bullish on mining stocks?

MN: I think it is important to remember that only a few short years ago you would have traded your first born for prices at these levels. Even with higher costs of exploration and production, the cream still rises to the top. We should embrace the idea of higher costs as it rewards the productive who are willing to educate themselves and take risks to meet a need. This is so basic and so important. The most important disclosure I can make is that I am an optimist. Also, I believe that sooner or later the market rewards investors seeking companies with low relative valuations that are building shareholder value.

As I said, this feels a lot like the beginning of 2009, which was a short period of time that produced some very high returns. I can’t claim we are at the bottom but getting past seasonal tax loss selling, this is a good time to look for companies with good stories. If companies are better known, I look for production or catalysts for increasing or extending production, important for increasing fundamental value or new discoveries. In this environment, you have a lot to pick from.

TGR: Can you give me some examples?

MN: Two of the best well-known examples that fit this profile include Minefinders Corp. (MFL:TSX; MFN:NYSE) and Alexco Resource Corp. (AXR:TSX; AXU:NYSE.A). Both have operating mines in stable jurisdictions and have profitable operations with good potential for increasing or extending production, as well as significant “blue sky” potential.

Minefinders is currently operating a low-cost heap leach gold-silver Dolores mine near Chihuahua. It is on schedule to meet guidance of about 65–70 thousand ounces (Koz) gold and 3.3–3.5 million ounces (Moz) silver in 2011. It is working on expanding with a mill operation to increase recoveries of higher grade ore from underground. This may add production in 2014; in the meanwhile it could bring its La Bolsa heap-leach gold project into production. This could add another 40 Koz gold starting in 2013. In addition, Minefinders is accelerating exploration of its La Virginia project with potential of generating a resource. Profitable operations should fund these activities, reducing the need to go to the market and risk diluting shareholders.

Also, Alexco just finished its first year of profitable silver production at its Bellekeno mine in the Yukon. We believe it will optimize operations, increasing production of silver as well as lead and zinc as a by-product. It is also working to open two new mines to provide additional feed to the mill. Alexco should also be updating its resource estimate at Bellekeno and may produce new resource estimates at its Bermingham and Flame & Moth targets. Alexco should also be able to fund initiatives from production. It is on course to meet current guidance of 2 Moz silver in 2011 and has the goal to achieve midtier producer status in the next decade by producing 7–10 Moz of silver annually.

We also believe Aurcana Corporation (AUN:TSX.V) fits this profile but is still largely under investors’ radars. Aurcana has expanded processing at its La Negra silver and base metal mine in Mexico from 800 to 2,000 tons per day. In addition to production from La Negra, Aurcana is scheduled to commence production at its Shafter silver mine by June 2012 with annual production of about 4 Moz silver in its first year of operations. We visited the project prior to the holidays and were very impressed. Also, Aurcana has hired Dr. Peter McGaw to locate additional mineralization at each project to extend mine life. The potential to increase profitability and identify additional mineralization could lift the investment profile of Aurcana.

TGR: What early stage precious metal exploration companies are you watching?

MN: While clearly at the riskier end of the investment spectrum, most junior explorers are near their 52-week lows, so there is clearly an opportunity for bottom-up stock selection. There are a number of companies that have completed successful drill programs or are drilling historic resources and are close to announcing initial resources. Explorers now at the lower end of their trading range, while continuing to advance their projects, may receive favorable investor attention and experience appreciation by meeting milestones.

One of my favorites is Redstar Gold Corp. (RGC:TSX.V), which recently acquired the Unga gold project in the Aleutian Islands in Alaska. In 2011 it drilled about a dozen holes late in the season in hopes of upgrading a historic resource in the near term. While early in the exploration at Unga, there are possibly 30 kilometers (km) of vein structures. The mineralization is reminiscent of vein swarms seen in Patagonia. Should Redstar complete a compliant resource, investors should have a better idea of the project’s potential. The Unga project is in addition to the company’s high-grade gold Newman Todd project in the Red Lake Gold Camp in Ontario and about a dozen projects generated in Nevada from the acquisition of AngloGold Ashanti’s Nevada database.

Similarly, Argentex Mining Corp. (ATX:TSX.V; AGXM:OTCBB) is scheduled to produce an updated resource in the first quarter of 2012 on its Pinguino project in the Santa Cruz Province of Argentina. The updated resource will focus on silver-gold mineralization near surface. In addition to the potential for a new precious metal resource, Argentex has blue sky potential having encountered mineralization in 16 of 19 veins drilled. This is only about a third of veins identified on the project. As Argentex has about $10 million in the bank, it is not trading much higher than cash per share.

Also, we visited Revolution Resources Corp.’s (RV:TSX; RVRCF:OTCQX) Champion Hills project in North Carolina last year. The company has completed about 15,000 meters (m) of drilling at Jones-Keystone and Loflin prospects and is working to complete an NI 43-101-compliant resource. Gold mineralization is similar to Romarco Minerals Inc.’s (R:TSX) Haile project located in South Carolina. Should it produce a significant resource, this should raise the investment profile of Revolution and demonstrate the potential of its growing land position.

We also visited High Desert Gold Corp.’s (HDG:TSX.V) Gold Springs project a couple months ago. Gold Springs is located on the Nevada-Utah border. The company recently announced a resource with about 233,000 gold equivalent ounces on one of 18 targets. This new deposit is open laterally and at depth with reasonable expansion potential. High Desert owns 60% of the project in partnership with Pilot Gold Inc. (PLG:TSX). High Desert recently completed a ZTEM geophysical survey allowing it to identify a number of blind targets and selectively expand the project to district scale, which is more important than the new resource. Additional drilling should lead to additional resources. We think High Desert has the potential to eventually build a several million ounce gold resource.

Probably our most intriguing idea is Gold Port Resources Ltd. (GPO:TSX.V). The company has a gold project in Guyana. Gold Port is still very early and located in a challenging rainforest setting. It is currently working to upgrade an historic resource of 94 million tonnes grading 0.7 grams/tonne gold and 0.15% copper. This historic resource was established over a decade ago at much lower metal prices by Coeur d’Alene Mines Corp. (CDE:NYSE). In the near term, should Gold Port confirm a fraction of the historic resource, it may move the company’s shares out of penny stock status.

TGR: Is your focus solely on precious metals?

MN: Primary gold and silver projects generally command a premium to base metal projects. But there are large copper-gold projects with a bias toward gold that should attract more investor attention if they can grow in size. Two companies that come to mind are Northern Freegold Resources Ltd. (NFR:TSX.V) and Kiska Metals Corp. (KSK:TSX.V).

Northern Freegold has already identified a million-plus gold deposit in the Yukon. The company recently completed a drill program on an adjacent gold-copper porphyry and is scheduled to produce a compliant resource in the coming months. This new target extends only over about 1km of a 6–8km anomaly. We believe the project has the potential to be competitive with Western Copper and Gold Corp.’s (WRN:TSX; WRN:NYSE.A) Casino project in size and grade but with a gold bias and with fewer infrastructure challenges.

Kiska also has a multi-million ounce gold equivalent deposit at its Whistler gold-copper project near Anchorage, Alaska. The company has discovered five additional porphyry targets and has completed 30,000m of drilling in 2011. Kiska is now aggressively exploring the large Island Mountain target. The gold mineralized zone comes to surface. The metallurgy is good and investors may take note of this target, which is still open in three directions. We believe in time the Whistler project has the potential to resemble other large projects in Alaska and British Columbia.

TGR: Thank you for your insights.

Mike Niehuser is the founder of Beacon Rock Research LLC, which produces research for an institutional audience and focuses in part on precious, base and industrial metals, oil and gas and alternative energy. Previously a vice president and senior equity analyst with the Robins Group, he also worked as an equity analyst with The RedChip Review. He holds a bachelor’s degree in finance from the University of Oregon.

Solid BitCoin Consolidation Finally Bears A BitCoin Breakout

Few assets are as volatile as BitCoins have been. Over the past 365 days they have ranged from about $0.05 to over $30. After a solid consolidation BitCoins have now broken out and the next upleg appears to have appeared with a 35% rise in the past 10 days.

BitCoin makes this payment efficiency possible because it is based on cryptographic protocol where its security is grounded in the laws of mathematics not laws of men which may or may not be enforced profitably.

THE BITCOIN RANGE

Back in June 2011 I wrote about how I supposedly missed the trade of the year where I could have “with a completely non-levered investment that would have turned [$5,000] into slightly over $550,000 in 8 months. $550,000 in a completely anonymous account with neither a paper or audit trail nor a 1099 and the asset would have been purchased with $5,000 of physical cash.”

Some say hindsight is 20/20, but I do not think so, because it still takes the gathering, analyzing and understanding of the data before one can get a picture and sense of what has happened. Before there were no data points to use in predicting the sustainability of the unsustainable BitCoin upleg. But this time around we can make slightly more grounded prognostications.

Filtering out the daily noise of the markets is essential if one is going to hone in on the signal. One of my favorite tools to accomplish this is the simple 200 day moving average. Taking into account almost seven months of data it is long enough to filter out daily noise, like the MF-Global or MyBitCoin fiascoes, but still close enough to capture the general trend of long-term secular markets, whether bullish or bearish. To derive a relative price I take the current price divided by the 200 day moving average.

In BitCoins case we now have a tremendous upleg and crash in the history books. An analysis of the data reveals the low end of the relative price is around 0.35x (cheap) while the high end was about 12x (expensive).

bitcoin consolidation

To create the organized cryptographic hash required energy which had value in the market.

BITCOINS PROVIDE UTILITY AND ARE VALUED

BitCoins are a decentralized peer to peer digital currency. They are the most efficient and safest form of currency I am aware of. Sure, they have neither the intrinsic value nor depth of volume like gold but they are still harmonious with the regression theorem. To create the organized cryptographic hash required energy which had value in the market just like gold had value in the market for jewelery before it acquired additional value from its utility from moneyness and currency applications.

For example, I was reading a blog which recommended the application Total Finder. Total Finder allows one to open multiple tabs in the Mac Finder which makes dragging, dropping or locating folders and files much easier. It is a feature that should be built into the OS but is not so a creative entrepreneur saw a market need and filled it.

I immediately recognized that this application would save me time and decided to purchase it. The price was $18 and it is available in the Apple store. Then I did a Google search for “Total Finder bitcoin” and found the author’s article Trade Total Finder for BitCoins. As expected there was a discount, 50%. Why is that?

Because the current payment systems are too expensive. Apple takes 30%, the credit cards and processors take 1-7% and require the identity of both the buyer and seller along with sales and income taxes which are much easier to enforce plus your accounts can be arbitrarily frozen like with the Wikileaks banking blockade. By removing all these middlemen moochers and looters from the transaction both parties are better off with a 50% discount in price.

BitCoin makes this payment efficiency possible because it is based on cryptographic protocol where its security is grounded in the laws of mathematics not laws of men which may or may not be enforced profitably.

I think everyone should hold some BitCoins, perhaps at least 0.1% of their net worth, in their portfolio.

BITCOIN VOLUME HAS INCREASED TREMENDOUSLY

The rise in BitCoin’s exchange rate has surprised me. First, BitCoins are currently being inflated at approximately 42% per year. That is quite the increase in the currency supply. Second, early adopters are sure to control tremendous amounts of BitCoins and I would think they would be divesting themselves as the market would bear without sinking the price too drastically and third the BitCoin economy is still in its infancy.

Over the last six months I have watched the average transactions in the public block explorer grow to about $1 million per day. The exchanges have increased their trading volume from about 40,000 coins per day to approximately 200,000 on 19 Dec 2011. With about 8 million BitCoins in circulation there is plenty of volume to provide a bid for any early adopters who decided to disgorge large amounts of coins.

BitCoin is an illusion like the FRN$, Euro or Yen. The market is deep enough that I would place it in the cash portion of your balance sheet. Additionally, if you take the proper steps it is the most portable money ever. For that element of safety and liquidity therefore I think everyone should hold some BitCoins, perhaps at least 0.1% of their net worth, in their portfolio.

CONCLUSION

Watching this breakout and ensuing upleg in BitCoins is going to be exciting. Since the last rally in June there have been real life applications developed from mobile payments to massive online stores with hundreds of thousands of items, entrepreneurs have stepped in to accept BitCoins as payment, the client has been greatly improved, exchange security has been enhanced, with proper privacy hygiene your cryptographic hash is more secure than even a gold coin and more people understand what BitCoins are, how they work and why they want some.

Taking the current price of $4.00, the 200 day moving average of about $8.50 and extrapolating this upleg with a 12x 200dma top we could see a price of around $80.00 per BitCoin. Is this speculative? Yes. Would I bet on seeing $80 per BitCoin by around June or July? Maybe if the odds are around 5%. But I would take a bet for BitCoins to hit $7.50 by June or July at around a 50-70% probability.

So, if you want to buy any Run To Gold products using BitCoins just contact me and we can make a deal with a substantial discount. If you need a place to get any BitCoins then I recommend the Tradehill exchange.

My thoughts on Freegold

A reader, LS, asked for my thoughts on the following topics:

1) freegold
2) the gold for oil trade
3) the current price is not a real physical price of gold because of happenings in COMEX/LBMA
4) do you believe the current world affairs will resolve itself towards freegold or something similar?

Firstly, I haven’t had the time to read FOFOA in depth given the amount of material and thus give it justice. My comments here are therefore tentative thoughts.

Freegold is very interesting and I can see the logic of the idea of leaving fiat to perform the medium of exchange role and gold the wealth store role. I have a feeling free banking (see also) and a restriction on maturity transformation would need to be involved for it to work. There is a hell of a lot of discussion condensed in that sentence, more than I have time for at the moment.

I would also argue that Freegold needs to allow gold leasing but not gold lending. By “leasing” I mean as in leasing a car, ie physical asset rented (not borrowed and sold). Manufacturers of gold products like the Perth Mint could not operate without leasing because with Freegold’s ban on lending of gold and other financialisations it would be difficult (impossible?) to hedge against gold price movements.

This leads to my next point, which is that the gold price under Freegold would not be stable and still exhibit some volatility. This is because under Freegold people can save excess wealth either in gold or by investing in productive enterprises (ie true investment). Human nature being what it is we will still have overestimation of the success of productive enterprises, thus failures, thus business cycles, ths varying preferences to store wealth in gold versus investments.

On the Oil/Gold idea, I don’t have an option as this is not an area of FOFOA I’ve looked at much.

The current price is a real physical price as physical buyers and sellers of size (giants) are willing to exchange at that price. When aversion to counterparty risk really hits market players (MF Global you’d think should have been enough), then we will see a divergence between paper and physical.

As to the fourth question, well this is bound to my answer in the paragraph above, which is a necessary condition, but not sufficient, for Freegold to emerge. You would also need consensus that a gold standard is not the answer, and there are strong forces working towards that end. Possibly the biggest problem is getting people to understand the reason why financialisation of gold needs to be banned. How it will end is impossible to predict.

Either way it is going to be exciting to see how it plays out.

Casey Research Summit Special Report: Surviving the Death of Money

Marin Katusa Louis  James Rick Rule When the currency system as we know it dies, some people will become very wealthy. In this special report from the Casey Research/Sprott Inc. Summit “When Money Dies,” The Gold Report cornered Global Resource Investments Founder and Chairman Rick Rule, Casey Research Senior Editor Louis James and Casey Energy Opportunities Senior Editor Marin Katusa for a roundtable discussion on the best strategies for thriving during the coming economic transition.

The Gold Report: Since we are at a conference called “When Money Dies,” please explain who killed money and how, after all these years of governments around the world trying everything from quantitative easing to bank bailouts, we are still in the midst of the weakest global economy in this generation’s history?

Rick Rule: The answer is in an old Pogo Cartoon that reads: “I have seen the enemy and he is us.” Collectively in the West, we have lived beyond our means for a substantial amount of time. We rely on a government that we have paid to steal from our neighbors. Money is how we deal with transfers. Dealing with transfers dishonestly by making more of the medium that isn’t backed by any value is the process by which money dies.

Louis James: The problem is that you are asking the guardian who has stolen the goods to recover them. Government has been in charge of money for hundreds of years. When it is debased, you have to ask: “Who was watching the hens in the hen house?” When you discover who the fox is, you don’t want to put him back in charge.

TGR: We are looking at quantitative easing 3 (QE3) in the U.S. Europe is considering the same thing. Even China is doing its version. Will money actually die or will it all inflate together?

Marin Katusa: I am going to take the contrarian view. With all this quantitative easing, there is actually asset deflation occurring right now if you look at the valuations from an equity standpoint. Trillions will be printed, but look at the deflation in the assets. He who has cash will be king because he can afford to buy these discounted stocks. If you do your homework and be sharp, you will make a fortune in the next three years.

TGR: But money is an asset; cash is an asset. If you are holding your wealth in money wouldn’t it all deflate?

MK: It’s all about purchasing power. Look at Canada’s largest oil company. It is just as good of a company as it was three months ago, but it has lost half its market cap, which means your dollar will buy more of a great company. It isn’t inflationary all across the board. It’s an asset deflationary market. That is a current example of equity asset deflation in the market right now.

TGR: So cash will deflate less rapidly than physical equities?

MK: Yes, right now.

RR: It is likely that the purchasing power of Western currencies will lose 5%–7% compounded for a long while, maybe until they go extinct. But in the interim, when you are experiencing incredible volatility, that is demonstrably better than losing 30% per anum in assets that are illiquid. Despite the fact that money is going to die, perversely you have to have lots of it to take advantage of the liquidity crisis.

LJ: You see, inflation figures are averages. Asset price destruction in a certain area doesn’t negate monetary inflation, nor its impact on other prices. Tremendous money creation is going on. This has economic consequences. The guy at the supermarket can see it even if his house is worth less. It is the worst of all possible models. Necessities cost more, but once trusted assets—the store of wealth in real estate and pensions—are depreciating. This has investment and economic consequences. The government is creating all this money and blowing it out the window. You have to figure out where to stand with a net.

TGR: How do you know what way the wind is blowing so you know where to place your net?

LJ: It’s all about stuff. Stuff people need is, in general, good when paper or theoretical money is bad. In certain asset classes, including real stuff, there will be price destruction. Real estate, for instance, still has a speculative side to it and has not yet bottomed. But fundamentally, real stuff that has value can’t just blow away. The world will go forward. People will need food and raw materials. Gold is another vehicle with intrinsic value. These things can’t be inflated out of existence. When prices on valuable stuff goes down ridiculously, that should be seen as a godsend. People will still need copper, steel and timber. Buy when that stuff is priced low and wait for it to go high, then sell.

TGR: Oil is priced in dollars. Is there a dollar price above which demand stops?

MK: Yes, that is why you have to put the price into perspective when considering an investment. Are you valuing a company at $60, $70 or $80/barrel (bbl.) oil? If a company isn’t making money at $60/bbl. oil, you don’t want to own that stock.

TGR: The market in the last six months has been volatile, but it seems to be like a roller coaster coming back to where it started. Is there a bigger trend moving daily prices?

RR: Dramatic volatility will lead to higher highs and lower lows. Despite the fact that it may look like a mean on a chart, people who experience it don’t experience a mean. They experience extraordinary discomfort. The fact that a $10 stock becomes a $7 stock in a few days causes people to speculate less frequently. It tames the animal spirits. The volatility will act as a depressant on the market.

That is why it is important to understand the causes of these fluctuations. QE is a polite way of saying counterfeiting. If you debase the denominator, the numerator doesn’t seem to matter much. You are actively debasing the currency by making it less rare. In the process, the government has declared a war on savers, reducing the utility they could get through traditional savings, forcing them to make more speculative investments.

The problem is even deeper than that, however. At the same time you have plentiful money, you have restrictive credit. People assume prices get set across the whole spectrum, but they get set on the margin and dramatically on the margin based on the psychology of the participants. It makes no sense. Look at the downdrafts in commodities. Nothing about the utility of copper caused it to fall. But interdraft lending dried up and when credit goes away, fabricators, traders and shippers can buy. Economic dislocations like this cause the market to be really volatile for substantial periods of time, which will unnerve many market participants.

I am actually fairly excited about it. I believe if it is going to happen anyway, find a way to enjoy it.

TGR: Marin, you are skilled at mathematics. Your models help assess equities. In a market driven by psychology and government policies, how relevant are your models and have you changed the factors you use to value companies?

MK: Since so many people are investing on emotion in the resource sector, you have to take your profits in a bull market and have lots of cash on hand to take advantage of deals in a bear market. In the program I created, there are literally thousands of variables you can analyze and interpret, but one of my favorite metrics for the junior exploration sector is the Casey Cash Box Indicator. One year ago, three companies were trading for less than cash on hand. Now I know of a little over 30. But, we are no where near the low of March 2009 when over one-third of all the companies on the TSX and TSX-V were trading less than cash. The Cash Box Indicator is what I use to give me a “feel” of the psychological sentiment in the market. When there are lots of companies trading under cash, people are fearful, and that is good if you’re looking for value.

For the junior exploration companies that do not have any tangible assets, the models I use for producing projects with cash flow are not as relevant.

TGR: Louis, you are out there visiting companies all over the world. In this market, how important is management?

LJ: It is and it isn’t. Having competent people to run the show is imperative. The alternative is non-competent people. Who wants that? Incompetence shows up quickly in performance. But just because a company has good people and a good project doesn’t mean it will do well; nature may not cooperate with exploration, or it could run out of money. When fear is in the driver’s seat, people are less willing to take chances, even on good people.

In the end, volatility is your best friend because you know that a market that’s down will go up again. When your favorite wine or something you value goes on sale, you don’t complain. You celebrate and buy two. We have that opportunity now. Wall Street hates volatility, Howe Street loves volatility—or it should, even on the downside, because that is a sign that it’s shopping season.

TGR: In the 1970s, we saw a bullish precious metals market, followed by a big upside. This time we had a big upside and now extreme volatility. Have we already experienced the extent of the bull side?

RR: You have to acknowledge the fact that despite volatility’s unpleasantness, it can be an opportunity. Gold and silver still have a long way to go although it may not be straight up. Even if it were to go to $2,500/ounce (oz.) eventually, it could test $1,000/oz. first. You have to have an understanding of history in order to understand what you might face. Keep cash on hand to take advantage of the volatility. Prepare yourself to have the courage to take advantage of the dips. A lot of people have been responsible investors and studied everything about the market except themselves. They haven’t prepared themselves. You need the cash and courage to use volatility.

Be careful, however. Don’t get your information from the market. The market is a mob. It is a facility to buy fractional ownership of businesses. But you have to get a sense of the value of the business to make good decisions. Take advantage of the idiocy of the other players. Other players only drive value of the stock in the short term. In the long term, the company fundamentals will determine the value of the business. What the three people in this room have become good at is buying companies that will be taken over by the industry at higher prices later. Playing foolishness is fun, but that is less important than the fundamentals associated with the valuations of the companies. The safest and most consistent money is made when you find discrepancies in the valuation of a company and the market valuation and play the arbitrage.

TGR: How can you value gold in a volatile market like this where the price of gold can vary between $1,000/oz. and $1,900/oz. Do those lows wipe out some companies?

LJ: The average cost of production for most companies is $600/oz. Even at $1,000/oz. gold, a 40% margin in any industry is considered pretty good. A lot of mining companies are making lots of money right now, which means they are fundamentally strong. In the face of that, when the market fluctuates, it’s a good thing; it brings opportunity. I have stocks in my portfolio that we have been able to take profits on when they were high and buy again when they were stupid cheap. We have been able to make doubles this way multiple times—on the same stock.

But not all gold stocks are production stories. How do you value an exploration play where there is no particular asset? That is difficult. You can use peers, or speculate about what the company might have in the ground if it is successful and try to estimate a value. Whatever path you choose, you should have some kind of metric, a sense of what is reasonable.

A great example of how volatility can create opportunity and profits is Extorre Gold Mines Ltd. (XG:TSX; XG:NYSE.A; E1R:Fkft), the spin out from Exeter Resource Corp. (XRC:TSX; XRA:NYSE.A; EXB:Fkft), operating mostly in Santa Cruz, Argentina. I have been there and looked at the main asset. I have no doubt the flagship Cerro Moro project is going to be a highly profitable mine, unless the government goes completely insane. Extorre had good exploration success there and has started getting very positive results from a second project. Based on this work, Extorre went from CAD$2 to CAD$14, so naturally we took profits along the way. I love Extorre, but at CAD$12, its market cap was greater than some profitable producers with cash flow and it was still just exploring. Now, with no bad news from the company, the market correction has the stock down to CAD$7. We know more about its assets now than we did when the shares were higher, but it’s selling cheaper, so it’s a better value now. We don’t know when things will go up and down, we just know they will. We know when they are cheap it is a good time to buy; when they are expensive, it’s a good time to take profits.

TGR: It seems like investors have to be more active now, going in and out of stocks. They can’t just buy and sit on them.

MK: You have to be careful in this volatile market. An investor needs to understand what type of investor he/she is. If you are a day trader, this is your type of market, because the volatility and big swings are present. I don’t believe relative valuation. I think it is important to distinguish between intrinsic valuation and relative valuation. But the answer to your question really depends on what type of investor you are and why you bought the specific stock. In my experience, my biggest gains have been buying big positions in companies where I believed in management and the projects, and bought more when the stock was down, and held the stock for more than a few years.

LJ: There is a distinction between resource investing and mainstream investing. Tried and true Graham-Dodd analysis was never applicable to our industry because the underlying commodities change too quickly, making even the biggest companies too fickle for that sort of securities analysis. However, I would posit that Wall Street is becoming more like Howe Street in a post-Lehman Brothers world. Everyone is taking more risk. There is no safe place anywhere in the world where you can buy a stock and forget about it.

RR: The two central tenets of Ben Graham’s book The Intelligent Investor deal with evaluating the margin of safety and management. You have to speculate in companies that have the financial wherewithal to weather the most immediate risks. In today’s volatile market, you are competing against manic-depressive traders who show up one day wanting to pay more than what you have is worth and the next day willing to sell for less than their assets are worth. In a devotion to net-nets, one of the best indicators of when you ought to be all-in is when it is full of people so disgusted in the market they are selling for less than they are worth. It’s a great time to be an investor.

TGR: If a lot of these companies are worthless, how does the average investor know which companies can go the distance?

LJ: You have to make your own decisions based on your risk tolerance. Your mileage will vary. Read the financial statements, talk to management. At some point you have to act, but you can and should wait until you are fully confident in your investment decision, so your confidence won’t be easily shaken by market volatility. It’s not like baseball; you can wait for the perfect ball, so don’t swing until you’re sure you’re buying low.

MK: Great tools are available. Watch the legends and insiders to see what they are buying and selling.

TGR: My last question is how does a new investor start in this industry?

RR: Go for a walk. Have a conversation with yourself. Do a personality audit. How hard are you willing to work and what is your risk tolerance? If you aren’t willing to work and don’t like volatility, try owning physical trusts, ETFs or seniors. If you have a longer-term perspective and stomach for volatility, you can take advantage of the opportunities in the junior space. But you need to have a plan.

MK: You can’t succeed unless you are passionate in whatever you do. If you don’t really like the sector, then you won’t go as deep as you need to have success and you won’t make the best decisions. Make sure you have a passion for mining. And have fun. Life is short.

You also have to be willing to make lonely trades. When everyone else says you are wrong, that is when investing becomes very interesting.

RR: Just because everyone else’s money dies, that doesn’t mean your money has to die. You are responsible for your future.

Founder and CEO of Global Resource Investments and President of Sprott Asset Management USA, Rick Rule began his career in the securities business in 1974 and has been principally involved in natural resource security investments ever since. He is a leading American retail broker and asset manager specializing in mining, energy, water utilities, forest products and agriculture. Rule’s company has built a sterling reputation for its specialist expertise in taking advantage of global opportunities in the resources industries. In 2011, Rule closed a landmark deal with Eric Sprott, Founder of Sprott Inc., another famous powerhouse in the arena. Sprott Inc. offers resource-oriented investors opportunities in segregated managed accounts, mutual funds, hedge funds and private partnerships. The collective organization offers unparalleled expertise and access to investment opportunities in all resource sectors. Sprott Inc. manages a portfolio of small-cap resource investments worth more than $8 billion and boasts a workforce of more than 130 professionals in Canada and the U.S.

Louis James is chief metals and mining investment strategist at Casey Research, where he is also the senior editor of Casey’s International Speculator, Casey Investment Alert and Conversations with Casey. When not in meetings with mining company executives in Vancouver, B.C., James regularly travels the world evaluating highly prospective geological targets and visiting explorers and producers getting to know their management teams. For more than 25 years, Casey Research, headed by investor and best-selling author Doug Casey, has been helping self-directed investors to earn returns through innovative investment research designed to take advantage of market dislocations.

Investment Analyst Marin Katusa is the senior editor of Casey’s Energy Report, Casey’s Energy Opportunities and Casey’s Energy Confidential. He left a successful teaching career to pursue what has proven an equally successful—and far more lucrative—career analyzing and investing in junior resource companies. With a stock pick record of 19 winners in a row—a 100% success rate last year—Katusa’s insightful research has made his subscribers a great deal of money. Using his advanced mathematical skills, he created a diagnostic resource market tool that analyzes and compares hundreds of investment variables. Through his own investments and his work with the Casey team, Katusa has established a network of relationships with many of the key players in the junior resource sector in Vancouver. In addition, he is a member of the Vancouver Angel Forum, where he and his colleagues evaluate early seed investment opportunities. Katusa also manages a portfolio of international real estate projects.

Rick Rule: Play Metals Stock Volatility to Win

Rick Rule In March of 2011, Global Resource Investments Founder and Chairman Rick Rule predicted a time of unprecedented volatility. As investors struggle to recover from what, indeed, turned out to be one of the most up-and-down months in history, this special Gold Report from his latest web broadcast outlines his secrets for using volatility as a tool to take advantage of new opportunities.

Scientists define volatile organic compounds as naturally occurring or man-made chemicals with low boiling points, a condition that allows these molecules to easily evaporate into the air, potentially causing irritation and creating an explosive environment. As Global Resource Investments Founder and Chairman Rick Rule predicted last March, man-made volatility has clouded the economic environment for the last month and could continue to do so for the next 12 months, according to his analysis. But volatility doesn’t have to be painful, he says, if you prepare yourself with plenty of cash and courage. “Volatility is like cyclicality. It is really a series of opportunities to buy low and sell high. And, if you understand volatility for what it is and accept it, it could be a tool as opposed to a threat. ”

The Un-Recovery
First, he outlines the reasons for the volatility. Rule doesn’t see a recovery in the United States. “I see government-induced liquidity in the market and I see some recovery in equities prices as a consequence of very, very, very low—make that negative—real interest rates as well as hope on Wall Street and in Washington,” he says. The problem with this paper recovery is that liquidity wasn’t what caused the recession. The issue is that individual and government balance sheets are unbalanced. Many of the assets are ephemeral. Unfortunately, liabilities are almost always real. “As a society, we owe an amount that is unserviceable relative to what we produce,” he says.

By encouraging people to spend more money they don’t have, the government is making the problem worse. Instead, he thinks people should rebalance their balance sheets and invest more in this country. “The idea that we can fix the fact that we owe too much money by encouraging borrowing and spending is an example of the idiocy that comes out of Pennsylvania Avenue and will continue to weigh down the recovery.” He says, “Until we deal with the problems that confront us in society, we are not going to have a U.S. economic recovery.”

Rule points to a war against savers. “The Fed has declared war on productive elements of society in order to distribute the benefits to the less productive elements of society. This is not the key to prosperity.” Drilling down interest rates punishes savers and rewards spenders. “This is perverse, truly perverse,” he says. He equates “quantitative easing” to a fancy way of saying “counterfeiting.” Increasing the nation’s money supply without increasing society’s ability to create utility through the provision of goods and services is simply fraud. You can’t maintain the value of a currency unit if you create it out of thin air far in advance of the society’s ability to generate value. That is true in the U.S. and abroad. “I have always said that the U.S. dollar is the worst in the world except perhaps for all the others,” he jokes. Rule is not alone in his low opinion of paper currency. Casey Research Chairman Doug Casey famously noted that the U.S. dollar is an I.O.U. nothing. The euro is a “who owes you” nothing. “It’s an artificial construct,” Rule says. “Europe truly is the triumph of politics over economics.”

One example of the irrational European economic policy now in fashion is the decision to “bail” Greece out of the trouble it was having servicing debt that was 150% of GDP by requiring the struggling country to service debt that is 165% of GDP. “I defy the European Union to explain to me how by adding a big column of negative numbers they end up with a positive number; very, very, very problematic,” Rule says. And, problems get deeper. “Because of the extremely close ties between the big banks on both sides of the Atlantic with large amounts of primary capital represented by sovereign debt, many of the large private sector banks have multiples of shareholder equity invested in securities by issuers like Italy, Spain, Portugal, Ireland and Greece that are insolvent. This means by real accounting standards most of the big banks in Europe are broke.”

This economic reality doesn’t mean that banks are going to fail any time soon, Rule explains. It simply means that the shareholder’s equity in the bank—the value of assets minus the value of the liabilities—is probably negative if the securities that these banks have in sovereign—as opposed to solvent—issuers were removed. “The test going forward will be the test between those two words,” Rule says. “Sovereign does not make solvent.” He takes issue with the words of the famous CEO of Citicorp, Walter Wriston, who said countries don’t go broke. “That was wrong. Countries do go broke. Countries will go broke. The question in Europe now is whether the savers—Finland, Austria and Germany—will decide that they and their children are going to carry the lifestyle of the rest of the Europe.”

The discussion going on in Europe right now is the same as the one going on in the United States, he says. “Who should benefit from production—the producer or the non-producer?” He points to a war worldwide between these two factions. “Sadly, non-producers outnumber producers and, in a democracy, the war is often won by the non-producer.” He likens democracy to a vote by five coyotes and a lamb over what to have for lunch. “That’s really the nature of the debate that’s taking place in the United States and Europe today.”

Free-ish China
“The good news about China,” Rule says, “is that over the last 30 years the place has become more, as opposed to completely, free. More than 30 years ago, Deng Xiaoping, then leader of the Chinese Communist Party, said ‘to become rich is glorious’ and China has become very glorious as a consequence of that.” Ironically, in this allegedly Communist country, there is no social safety net, meaning that people are on their own in China, Rule says. “As a consequence, savings are extraordinarily high, as much as 40% of a household income. So, China is generating enormous, enormous, enormous savings in direct contradiction to us, of course.”

Rule also points to more capital investment-friendly tax laws in the East. “In the United States if a big producer builds a big piece of manufacturing equipment, it may be required to amortize that equipment for tax purposes over 30 years. In China, that same producer is allowed to expense the equipment, meaning that there is a huge incentive to add the capital necessary to raise the utility of the workers operating that machinery. China is much, much, much friendlier to capital formation. The United States is much, much, much friendlier to consumption.” For these reasons and many more, Rule says “China, India and the frontier markets appear legitimately to be on the road to progress—a very different road than their European and North American cousins appear to have chosen.”

But, all is not bright in China. “Some 10,000 people rule 1.3 billion people and official sector misallocation is always a threat. The government decides what sectors should succeed, what sectors should fail. Expect the road to progress in China to be bumpy,” Rule warns.

The combination of domestic and international challenges on the horizon set the stage for more volatility, Rule concludes. “So many black swan events are looming that they resemble a flock of black swans. The idea that one of those black swans could precipitate an event like the ‘07–’08 liquidity crisis appears to me to be a very, very, very good possibility.” He goes so far as to suggest that in the next 18 months to 2 years, we could see a shut down for some period of time in interbank lending and frozen debt market liquidity. “In that set of circumstances you would want to have some cash,” he warns.

Golden (and Platinum) Opportunities
All of this darkness could shine a light on the metals—gold, silver, platinum and palladium, Rule says. “The most important part of the pricing of these metals is the continued debasement of fiat currencies. Metals prices worldwide are denominated in U.S. dollars. If the value of the denominator itself continues to decline, which I think it will, the nominal price for precious metals should continue to increase.” The increase may not be steady. “I suspect that these prices both up and down will be volatile for a few reasons,” Rule says. “Gold markets in particular, maybe silver markets as well, are determined by both of the primary economic motivators in the world—greed and fear. A raging bull market, which I think we might get into, compels people to buy gold bullion because they are afraid of the depreciation in dollars. This, in turn, stimulates the greed buyer who buys simply because the price went up and he or she understands the thesis. The price escalation in bullion that was driven by the greed buyer reinforces the fears of the fear buyer. And, the prices reverberate higher and higher as fear buyers and greed buyers compete with each other. That’s the market that we saw in 1979–1981—the single strangest bull market that I have experienced in my career. I suspect that we are likely in the early stages of a market that resembles that.”

The second set of circumstances Rule identifies as pushing gold prices up over the next year is supply-based. “In classical economics you are taught that higher product prices lead to increased supply. Because mining is a capital-intensive business, the response of the producers to increased commodity prices is not direct or immediate, particularly if interbank lending dries up debt financing needed for the large capital-intensive projects. There will be supply constraints that are, in some fashion, artificial.”

For supply-side reasons, Rule is increasingly attracted to the platinum business. More than 80% of platinum and palladium—PGM metals—come from three countries: South Africa, Zimbabwe and Russia. He cites local political turmoil as a limiting factor in the continued production in these areas. “Increasingly, South African governments are calling for more social rent—higher taxes, government participation in wage negotiations and, in some cases, outright nationalization. This will absolutely constrain the industry from making the investments in increasing production and sustaining their existing production over the five to seven years. Given that South Africa is the most important platinum producer in the world and it’s highly likely that the South African platinum producers will continue to constrain working capital investments, I would suspect that on a five-year going forward basis platinum production will falter.”

Moving north to Zimbabwe, Rule is no more optimistic. “President Robert Mugabe and his associates stole everything in the country that had any value. Now they have decided that about 150 people should control 51% ownership of the platinum mines in Zimbabwe. If you look at the track record of the black political elite in Zimbabwe managing the assets they have stolen over the last 20 years, you will see that the potential impact on platinum supplies as a consequence of their stealing productive capacity will be catastrophic.”

Rule sees Russia as a bright spot. “Russia gets slowly better over time. Yes, there are problems. The place is corrupt. They tend to attempt to mediate commercial disputes by shooting each other. There are problems with alcoholism. But, gradually things are improving in Russia. The difficulty isn’t Russian politics, but the fact that the big platinum and palladium producer there is running into lower and lower grades and having to go farther and farther down in the mines. Its production problems are organic as opposed to political.”

The bottom line for Rule is that there are going to be supply-side challenges in the platinum business at the same time that demand for platinum both as a precious metal for investment purposes and as an industrial metal for auto catalysts continues to increase. Rule acknowledges that a slowdown in the economy in Western Europe and North America will constrain vehicle demand there, but cites exploding vehicle demand in emerging markets, particularly China and India. Western air quality standards being imposed in both of these countries means that auto catalysts using platinum and palladium have kept pace with vehicle sales in those markets. “Strong demand and declining supplies point to very, very, very interesting opportunities in platinum markets,” he concludes.

Disconnected Equities
Good news for commodity prices has not always translated to rising junior mining stock prices. Rule sees four reasons for this disconnect. The first is historical. He credits the dramatic rise in precious metal stocks five years ago to an anticipation of the increase in bullion prices. “Some of the reaction that you might have expected in the equities prices might have occurred before the event took place,” he explains.

The second reason is what he calls “dismal corporate performance” over the last 10 years. “One would expect with the gold price increasing from $260 an ounce (oz.) to $1,800/oz. and silver increasing from $4/oz. to $40/oz. would result in absolutely skyrocketing free cash flows generated from the companies, but that didn’t happen. The operating response relative to the increase in product prices was, to be charitable, anemic.” The financial services industry, which had spectacular cash-generating expectations based on the returns of the 1970s, has been particularly disappointed. “There has been widespread disgust among gold share investors to the cash-generating performance of the companies relative to the escalation in their product prices,” Rule says.

The third factor is sector market-cap explosion. “Issuers—the mining companies and their cohorts in the financial services community—were engaged in inflation in the same way that governments around the world have issued lots of paper. Mining companies have issued billions of shares so that although the share price escalation has not been dramatic, the combined market capitalization of the precious metal sector producer, developer and explorer has grown at an extraordinary pace. There are many more issuers now than there were 10 years ago and every one of those issuers has many, many, more shares outstanding. You have to be very careful when you buy these things.”

The fourth point Rule makes is another cautionary one. “In the junior exploration sector, as many as 90% of market participants have absolutely no value. They are worth nothing. So, the sector as a whole can’t experience dramatic price appreciation when 90% of the paper in the sector is counterfeit or valueless. In fact, the gold shares are suffering from the same type of value depreciation as the U.S. dollar. You need to pay particular attention to defending yourself and your portfolios from these valueless, zombie security issuers.”

Rule stresses the importance of carefully evaluating a portfolio now, before the precious metals equity markets start experiencing price appreciation in the next three to six months. Why now? “Any price appreciation anticipation is over,” he says. “There is no premium built into the metals prices relative to the commodity anymore. In fact, this disparity has been noted. We think for the first time in some time the precious metals equities are reasonably priced relative to the metal itself,” Rule says.

Rule is also more positive on the issue of executive competence. “Corporate performance, which has lagged terribly over the last five years has begun to increase,” he says. For the last two or three years, the industry as a whole has generated about $2 billion (B)–$2.5B a year in surplus cash. This year, he expects the industry to generate between $4.5B–$5B, a clean double in 12 months. “The performance that hasn’t occurred hitherto is beginning to occur now,” he says. This cash on company balance sheets will enable them to do many things—greenfield and brownfield developments in their own portfolios along with mergers and acquisitions.

These are all positives for company prospects, Rule says. “We are now truly in a discovery cycle. For the last nine years the exploration industry has been well funded and well staffed. That spending cycle is beginning to yield discoveries. There is nothing, nothing that adds both liquidity and courage to junior equities markets like discovery.” Rule points to the last discovery cycle in ‘95 and ‘96 when some stocks went from $0.30 to $30.00 in 19 months. “My suspicion is that the underperformance of select precious metals equities for the next three to six months is over. Will it be volatile? It will absolutely be volatile. But, the fact is anticipation is no longer in the market; there isn’t a bullish outlook, which perversely is good. There is liquidity in the system. There is the will and the urge to merge so consolidation will take place. And, all of this will be punctuated by discovery.”

Rule also advises balance when it comes to choosing between seniors and juniors. “For those of you who are investors, for those of you who look at a return on capital employed rather than praying for a return of capital employed, you would go to the senior producers and the senior producers would do well. We particularly favor acquisition strategies that involve buying select seniors and your global broker can help you in that selection. And, then selling puts and calls against core positions. That is, allowing the market to pay you to buy low and sell high or acquiring the position simply by selling a put. We think the seniors are uniquely priced. We don’t think, by the way, that you pile in and build 100% position right now. We think you take a third position or a half position relative to where you want to end up because we are going to experience incredible volatility. But, we think this is the time to begin to establish positions.”

Rule cautions that investors need to be willing to take more risk with juniors. “The volatility will be more pronounced the farther out the quality scale you become. But the potential for reward is outsized too.” He anticipates a lot of mergers with juniors acquiring each other and juniors being acquired by the intermediates and intermediates and juniors being acquired by the seniors. “Given the relative underperformance of the juniors this year to last year, in November and December of this year—during tax-loss selling seasons—could be a once-in-a-decade acquisition opportunity.”

Rule ends by reiterating his words of warning about the volatility in the air. “This will not be stair steps to heaven. This market will not go straight up. The buzz word and I’m going to say it again and again and again in this broadcast is going to be volatility.” Again, he looks to the past to illustrate what could happen in the coming year. “Some of you will remember the 1970s bull market in precious metals when the price advanced from $35/oz. to $850/oz., a truly breathtaking ascent. You need to bear in mind that in 1975, in the middle of that ascent, the gold price fell from $210/oz. to $104/oz., a 50% decline. And the share price decline in the mining shares was even more dramatic. Did it matter over the course of a decade? No. Did it matter to people who suffered through the decline personally? Absolutely. So, while we think the sector is a good place to be don’t think of it as a place without risk.”

Founder and CEO of Global Resource Investments (GRI), Rick Rule began his career in the securities business in 1974 and has been principally involved in natural resource security investments ever since. He is a leading American retail broker specializing in mining, energy, water utilities, forest products and agriculture. Rule’s company has built a sterling reputation for its specialist expertise in taking advantage of global opportunities in the resources industries. Last month, Rule closed a landmark deal with Eric Sprott, another famous powerhouse in the arena. With GRI now a wholly owned subsidiary, Sprott, Inc. manages a portfolio of small-cap resource investments worth more than $8 billion and boasts a workforce of more than 130 professionals in Canada and the U.S. This article is based on Rule’s August 31Global Resource Investments webcast. Listen to the entire webcast.

Mickey Fulp: Can Gold Prospectors Cushion Volatility?

Mickey Fulp Mercenary Geologist Mickey Fulp has adopted a new prospector-generator model portfolio with an emphasis on good people. In this exclusive interview with The Gold Report, he outlines the impact global volatility could have on junior mining companies.

Companies Mentioned: Almaden Minerals Ltd. Antofagasta PLC Avrupa Minerals Brazil Resources, Inc. Estrella Gold Corp. Eurasian Minerals Inc. Uranium Energy Corp

The Gold Report: Is there a danger of food shortages starving emerging economies and putting an end to the secular commodity bull market? In your March 21 Musing newsletter, you tracked the commodities market back to 1955, illustrating the worldwide food inflation problem crushing poor countries. You have also written about the important role of these same emerging economies in pushing the eighth year in a commodity bull market. So I have to ask, could food shortages choke growing commodity demand?

Mickey Fulp: I think yes. I am less concerned about food inflation now that oil is down to less than $95 a barrel than I was when it was $115. It eases the pain a bit. But, we saw in the early part of the year two Middle Eastern countries with oppressive regimes fall. In Tunisia, a government that reigned for 23 years was taken down because of food riots. In Egypt, the catalyst for the government’s fall was food inflation. It is my opinion that if unrest were to spread to eastern Asia where a lot of the commodity demand growth is located, that could create another economic crisis and a collapse in the secular bull market for commodities—similar to what happened from mid-2007 to early-2009 when a U.S. banking crisis spread worldwide, bringing the global economic system to the verge of collapse.

TGR: Didn’t all commodities drop during that collapse, even gold at least for a short time?

MF: Absolutely. It went down to $680/oz.

TGR: I don’t even think the U.S. dollar did that well. Everyone just pulled in. So, if we see a shortage of food in eastern Asia, would that instill a growth slowdown and thus inhibit commodities? Or would precious metals begin to soar?

MF: I think precious metals would shine. Let’s use an analogy. In November of 2008, the gold price collapsed. It went down to $680/oz. and it hit a double bottom before it started rising. An amazing thing is that in the early part of 2009 gold and the dollar index increased at the same time. That’s quite unusual. The reason for that, in my opinion, was a run to what were perceived as safe havens. In the scenario we’re talking about right now, I would be very bullish on gold. That won’t preclude a selloff like we saw in the early fourth quarter of 2008, but to be safe, I will always want to have 10% of my net wealth in gold.

TGR: Wasn’t some of that 2008 decrease in gold due to massive deleveraging as people were forced to cash out to pay their calls?

MF: Yes and the reverse of that is happening now. The hedge funds and speculators pouring cash into gold paired with quantitative easing is a big reason for the run-up in the price of gold in the last year. We’re printing more and more fiat currency. So, if a crash were to happen again, the hedge funds will pile out of the commodities, take profits and sit on the sidelines for a while. If stocks start to collapse and margin calls come, people will liquidate whatever is . . .

TGR:. . .liquid.

MF: Yes, and that could be the precious metals again. But, the long-term purchasing power of gold is going to remain the same. So, overall we would expect gold to do quite well in an economic crisis.

TGR: You mentioned QE2 and hedge funds. Quantitative easing usually increases the price of gold while hedge funds depend on numerous other variables.

MF: Right. Hedge funds rush to the next big thing. That’s what we saw in early May when we experienced an across-the-board commodities correction. It didn’t last very long and it was not very deep, but hedge funds en masse ran out of commodities. Now, for the most part, commodities have stabilized. In the meantime, the junior resource sector continues to slowly progress to the downside.

TGR: That is my next question. You say the hedge funds will go to the next big opportunity. Since the junior precious metals market has underperformed compared to the gold price, do you see any probability that hedge funds will go into the junior market in the expectation of an equity catch up?

MF: That’s an interesting thought. Certainly, the junior sector looks downtrodden right now. There is always low liquidity during the summer doldrums. Toronto brokers summer in their cottages on the lake; Vancouver’s sharks go to the mountains; Europeans take leave for six weeks; and everybody in New York City is in the Hamptons. The Toronto Venture Index valuation lost 30% since closing above 2,400 on February 28. A post-Prospectors & Developers Association Conference pro selloff started in March, then we had “sell in May and go away.” Now we have a couple of months of summer doldrums looming. We generally see a seasonal uptick after everyone comes back to work in the first part of September. That is the time of year when we would expect higher volumes that could lead to higher junior valuations.

TGR: We started this conversation with agricultural intrigue. In the U.S., we’ve had an amazing amount of flooding, slicing into crop forecasts. As we move through the summer, do you expect more interest in “flight to safety” vehicles like gold for wealth preservation?

MF: Maybe. But here’s another argument to that scenario. We are approaching the seasonal low for gold. In most years, precious metals dip in July and August. For me, this is one of the annual opportunities for buying gold. I’ll get it for a better price than I will once the wedding, holiday and festival seasons start in the early fall in India and continue into China and the Muslim world. Low season’s coming up.

TGR: When you analyze companies, you review share structure, people and flagship projects. As you look at the juniors, are there some downtrodden companies that possess that unique combination of features that merit acquiring during the summer?

MF: I recently moved out of two gold companies because they experienced healthy run-ups and decided to move on to something else. That moved me out of the precious metals sector and more into the prospect-generator model. I cover Almaden Minerals Ltd. (TSX:AMM; NYSE:AAU), Avrupa Minerals (TSX.V.AVU), and Estrella Gold Corp. (TSX.V:EST) and am going to add another prospect generator soon. I have also added one new startup gold company called Brazil Resources Inc. (TSX.V:BRI). It’s the same team that was successful with Uranium Energy Corp (NYSE.A:UEC).

TGR: But this is a gold play?

MF: Yes. The company’s goal is to build a mid-tier gold mining company in Brazil in the near to midterm. I wrote about it in a recent Musing on my web site. It’s available free to all email subscribers and it’s an easy process to sign up and gain access.

TGR: Mickey, you have done quite a bit of geology in Peru and Chile in your career. How does Brazil play in terms of geological wealth compared to Peru and Chile?

MF: The geology is very permissive and it has a phenomenal gold budget. In my opinion, Brazil has been underexplored because it’s mostly in the Amazon with little outcrop and infrastructure; only about 15 juniors have active projects in Brazil and no major discoveries have occurred so we don’t see as much competition there. Additionally, Brazil is fairly bureaucratic, making business startup difficult. I like the people involved in Brazil Resources because they have run a successful startup before, I have a positive working relationship with them, and I respect them. I think they will be successful. I also like the relative lack of competition in Brazil paired with a tight share structure in the company.

TGR: Earlier, you said that on a macro-level you’re moving your portfolio out of gold plays and into prospect-generator models. What is it about this type of company that intrigues you?

MF: Prospect generators spend someone else’s money to advance projects. That means the company can avoid share dilution and preserve capital. The key is to find good prospects and good partners. It is an especially effective model in unsettled and down times in the market.

TGR: So, it is unsettled times that made you focus on the prospect-generator model?

MF: Not necessarily. I have been in prospect generators for at least two years now. I’ve just moved out of some pure precious metal plays because they had very good run-ups so I took profits. Part of it is I need to be stimulated. I will move into and out of stocks and pick new things because I like to generate ideas and make speculative money work for me and my subscribers. So, when a company has a two- or three-time run-up and I don’t see another double in the next year, then I take that money off the table and move it into another stock. If I pick a stock at $0.25 and it goes to $0.50, that’s a two-bagger. The chances of it going to $2 and another two-bagger is a lot less than if I go find another $0.25 company and play it to go to $0.50. It’s a matter of the power of two, of doubling your money. So, if you don’t think something has potential to double from where it is right now and you already have your double, then take that money off the table and go find another cheaper one.

TGR: In the prospect-generator model, you’re talking about spending someone else’s money to avoid dilution. But, it ultimately does need some good projects. You have often talked about a missing generation of geologists. In fact, in one of your Musings you talked about the importance of mentors. In a prospect-generator model, how important are the company geologists?

MF: They are of paramount importance. A prospect-generator model works only if the company has a cadre of excellent, field-savvy geologists with particular expertise in an area, a commodity or a deposit type. So, the geologist’s skill set is the first and foremost key to making a prospect generator work.

TGR: Tell me about the geologists and management at the three companies you mentioned earlier, Almaden, Estrella and Avrupa.

MF: Sure. Most of the time in these companies, the geologists and the management are one and the same. Almaden Minerals is run by geological engineer and Chairman Duane Poliquin. He founded the company in 1986 and it has been very successful. Almaden’s recent discovery is high grade and looks like it could be a district-wide gold-silver play in eastern Mexico. His son, Morgan, is now the company president. They are both good geologist prospectors and they’re the brains behind the outfit. Almaden really is a family-run organization. It is AMEX listed, has only 56M shares out and over $25M in working capital.

Estrella Gold is a fairly new company run by geologist-CEO Keith Laskowski who was responsible for Eurasian Minerals Inc.’s (TSX.V:EMX) success in Haiti. He is working in Peru, where the country is becoming more left-leaning in the wake of the election of a former military man. Economic and social policies no doubt will swing left in the country. However, Peru is a great destination for major mineral deposits. And Estrella Gold has the right set of investors behind it, with a low number of shares. It’s also a bit beaten up right now because of the political uncertainty. Avrupa Minerals is a relatively new prospect generator, less than a year old. It holds base metal plays in Kosovo and Portugal. The company announced recent success in vending four projects in Portugal, including a tungsten-gold play with potential. The company focus is on the Iberian Pyrite Belt and it just signed a joint venture agreement for three strategically-located properties with Antofagasta plc (LSE:ANTO).

TGR: Who are the geos there?

MF: The geologist-CEO is Paul Kuhn, a man I’ve known for 25 years. He’s spent a significant part of his career in eastern to southern Europe and western Asia—Avrupa Minerals’ focus areas. The company has a very competent staff in Portugal and I expect continued success there.

TGR: So, if we are looking at summer doldrums for the next several months and Rick Rule advises becoming accustomed to volatility, what is your favored investment strategy in the short term?

MF: I have a “wait and see” attitude right now. I’ve been buying some uranium stocks on weakness. As a contrarian, I like to buy when other people are exiting. There will be other buying opportunities in the near term, but I’m not sure if this is the time to do it. I suggest finding some good, fundamentally strong companies that you like, that you think will be healthy for the long term and can survive a downturn, and put in some low bids—stink bids. If they get filled so be it. And, if they don’t, oh well, they didn’t get to the level that you thought was a good risk-reward price. Don’t sell on emotion or panic. Develop a core speculating philosophy and stick with it. Modify it as market conditions require, but stick with what your basic investing philosophy demands.

TGR: Mickey, I appreciate your time.

Michael S. “Mickey” Fulp is author of The Mercenary Geologist. He is a certified professional geologist with a B.Sc. in earth sciences with honors from the University of Tulsa and M.Sc. in geology from the University of New Mexico. Mickey has more than 30 years experience as an exploration geologist searching for economic deposits of base and precious metals, industrial minerals, coal, uranium, oil and gas and water in North and South America, Europe and Asia. Mickey has worked for junior explorers, major mining companies, private companies and investors as a consulting economic geologist for the past 24 years, specializing in geological mapping, property evaluation and business development.

Rick Rule: Oil Will Be Major Economic Driver

Rick Rule Global Resource Investments Founder Rick Rule likes to look for unpopular investments because that usually means the prices are cheap. Today, that means oil, natural gas, uranium and geothermal. In this Energy Report exclusive excerpt from his talk at the Casey Research Conference in Baton Rouge, Rule explains the global forces that will lead to big payoffs in undervalued energy stocks.

The developed societies of the West are descending and destabilizing. People have come to believe that they are entitled to live beyond their means. I’m not an economist or a political scientist, but that perception leads to some very hard math. How can you add a column of negative numbers and come up with a positive? It’s not a uniquely American problem either. People in the old western societies, Canada and Australia suffer from the same delusion. We are old; we are fat; we are white and we are rich. Our collective problem was described by my grandfather in the following diddy: “When your outgo exceeds your income, your upkeep becomes your downfall.”

I’m not just talking about a problem of tax receipts or government spending or entitlements. It isn’t that we’re collectively stupid. It’s that we’re individually stupid. There seems to be a belief in the United States that a 55 or 56-year-old auto worker can make $55 an hour because he or she can employ technology better than a 22-year-old Indian auto worker. I don’t think so.

Another problem is that the root causes of the liquidity crisis of 2008 have still not been addressed. If you have a big problem that manifested itself in a fairly dramatic fashion and you haven’t addressed the causes, do you think it’s reasonable to be afraid of the fact that that probability may reassert itself? I do.

So, what’s the good news? The emerging and frontier markets—societies where people are un-free—are becoming a bit more free. As they become a bit freer, they become richer. Remember Chinese Communist Party Leader Deng Xiaoping, who famously said, “to become rich is glorious.” That phrase turned China loose. Make no mistake, we aren’t talking about an unending upward linear spiral. There is plenty of room for negative surprises. We have seen in places like Libya, Yemen and California that the road to freedom is uneven. But it is an undeniable force.

So we have descending destabilization of Western societies, which is not good for commodities. It’s not good for anything. But we also have ascending emerging markets. That is good for resources. When people get more money at the bottom of the economic pyramid, they buy things made of stuff. A poor person might trade a thatch roof for a metal roof. He might trade walking for a bicycle and eventually for a motor scooter. Old, fat rich people buy a nice dinner. Maybe we buy an iPod for a grandchild and load it with virtual songs. All good things, but they are not made of stuff. Selling stuff is what makes investors rich.

Think about it as two great weather systems coming together. Old, spoiled, rich and stupid meets this amazing demand for resources. What happens when two big weather systems collide? Stormy weather, turbulence, volatility. I think we’re going to see volatility on steroids. Volatility can cause strange things. Oil shoots up repeatedly above $100/barrel. Then there’s that other kind of volatility like in 2008 when things fell off a cliff. So, you have to manage expectations going forward. There will be more upward spikes and more down-spikes.

Now, volatility doesn’t need to be a risk. It’s up to you. Remember this. Perceptions of the future are set by immediate past experiences. That means in the near term, as Financial Author Jim Dines famously says, “a trend in motion stays in motion until it stops.” We often confuse a bull market with brains. Markets gain momentum and gain momentum and gain momentum and gain momentum. We buy a stock for $1.00. The stock goes to $2.00. What do we do? We double up. Think about this. Is this rational behavior? No, but it feels good. We’re smart. The stock went up. The sector’s good because the stock went up. The higher the prices go, the better we like it despite the fact that the value is eroding right in front of us. The contrarian thesis, of course, is to be brave when others are afraid and afraid when others are brave. It’s a wonderful slogan but it’s damn hard. When a company is selling for half it’s worth people complain that it never goes up. In other words, the fact that it’s cheap becomes a curse; a wonderful curse from my point of view. Unless, as occasionally happens, I’m wrong. What’s the biggest investment risk out there? Obama? Debt? Nuclear arms? No. The biggest investment risk you have is to the left of your right ear and to the right of your left ear. All of my worst financial experiences were self-inflicted.

The reality is that volatility is good because it represents a series of 40% off sales. It’s up to you whether you take advantage of volatility or whether volatility takes advantage of you. Common sense is the real determinant over whether you will do well. If something doesn’t make sense, very often it’s because it doesn’t make sense. Financier George Soros made almost all of his money finding widely-held premises that were wrong and betting against them. He famously decided in the year 2000 that the United States society was hubris infected. You remember the spectacular bull market of 2000. We had vanquished the Soviet Union and everyone thought nothing could go wrong with America. Soros bet against it. That’s the kind of common sense that will allow you to deal with volatility.

My approach is very simple. It comes down to this: “hit them where they ain’t.” Know this: A trade that’s popular, a perception that’s popular, an idea that’s popular is very likely overpriced. I’ve come to prefer underpriced. That’s why I concentrate on stuff that’s unpopular. Fortunately for me unpopular stocks are in fairly good supply. It’s an orientation that has served me well over the long term. Over the short term, however, this approach can be inconvenient from time to time. One thing that happens with lonely trades is that when you make a mistake, you usually make a fairly serious mistake. Your speculative portfolio isn’t trying hard enough if you don’t have a couple of positions lose 30% or 40%. I know this is hard to stomach, but it is true.

So, how do you create a portfolio that flourishes in the face of volatility when the resource market is no longer cheap? First case, create liquidity; have some cash. It’s ok if your cash is bullion, but have some cash. You have to have cash. When volatility occurs, cash will do two wonderful things for you. It will give you the ability and it will give you the ability to act in down markets. It doesn’t matter if stocks are cheap if you can’t do anything about it. Cash will also give you the courage to act. So, have some liquidity.

Then look for things other people aren’t looking at already. Ask yourself, “What’s unpopular?” I think energy is unpopular. Oil will be a major driver going forward. Globally, most oil is produced by national companies. It’s produced by the same people who can’t educate kids or deliver the mail. Governments are diverting oil revenue cash-flow to politically-expedient spending programs and not reinvesting in their oil business. I believe as much as 25% of the world’s supply of export crude will come off the market in five years. Specifically, I think that Mexico, Venezuela, Ecuador, Peru, Indonesia and, perhaps, Iran will cease to be oil exporters. So, think about some simple math. If worldwide export demand is growing at 3% compounded and worldwide supply falls by 25% remembering that prices are set on the margin, the outlook for the oil price has to be higher. And, oil drags all other forms of energy. Natural gas is already a third the price on an energy equivalent basis of oil. Natural gas prices are low and they are going to stay low for a couple of years. Natural gas is so unpopular in the Canadian brokerage community that gas might as well be a four letter word. No one wants to be near it. That means it is cheap. The same goes for uranium. What happened in Japan was a tremendous human tragedy. However, most of us, despite our fears about what happened in Japan, when we walk into a room and hit the switch prefer it if the lights go on. That is why global and Japanese use of nuclear power will continue to grow. I am also still positive about the prospects for geothermal. It is taking a long time, but that is why it is a good deal.

Good luck.

Rick Rule spoke at the recent Casey Summit “The Next Few Years” in Boca Raton, FL, along with 34 other renowned economists, investment pros and resource experts who shared their outlook for the future of the U.S. economy, the dollar, and the markets.

We are nearing an endgame

I consider comments like these below from a high profile business executive (as reported by The Australian) as significant. You can be sure the smart money is now positioning itself.
THE world economy is on “life support”, living beyond its means, with the threat of a cataclysmic shock within the next eight years, ABC chairman Maurice Newman warned yesterday. The former chairman of the Australian Securities Exchange, who is also a director of the Queensland Investment Corporation, said the Australian economy was better placed than many others to withstand the potential major shock to the world trade and financial system. But he warned that Australia had only a few years to get its economic house in order …
“We are nearing an endgame, which I put at no more than eight years away, possibly less,” he said. He warned that policy failures of governments, rising social costs and financial market volatility would “create a crisis” that would trigger “widespread trade and capital market dislocation”. …
But investors needed to prepare for the crisis by de-risking their portfolios and cleaning up their balance sheets. Australians needed to press their political leaders to make the economy more competitive.
Mr Newman predicted that the coming financial crisis could trigger an end to the role of the US dollar as the reserve currency of the world. He said it could be replaced by a system of International Monetary Fund drawing rights, which could be made up of a basket of currencies including the Chinese renminbi and gold.

Fake Volume And Increased Volatility

On 6 May 2010 the DOW dropped a massive 600 points in a mere seven minutes and at one point was down 998.50 points which is the largest nominal drop ever. One of the reasons for this increased volatility is the knowledge of all major market participants that their assets are neither safe nor liquid yet the greed to engage in speculation. As the true state of the worldwide financial markets and their fake liquidity increasingly permeates the zeitgeist more and more individuals will simply withdraw their capital and store it is the monetary metals.

Those who have followed RunToGold for a while have been adequately warned. For example, on 9 October 2009 I was interviewed on BNN and suggested that gold would reach $1,300 in Q2 2010 as the credit crisis intensifies. Now gold is within striking distance. On 7 February 2010 I warned of the approaching Laboon of sovereign debt default and Euro evaporation. Now it is happening. On 27 July 2009 I warned of the coming market crash. While the market is crashing when priced in gold it has still remained fairly orderly and but for The President’s Working Group On Financial Markets it would be a lot more chaotic.

VOLATILITY

When the financial markets experience unusual palpitations then those closely involved often flee for safety and liquidity. With high frequency trading powered by computer algorithms the result is a gigantic electronic herd moving at the speed of light. The result is an explosion in the VIX or CBOE Market Volatility Index.

… value and price are completely discrete.

The higher the VIX the more difficult it is for the entrepreneur, the individual that creates real wealth by providing the goods and services the economy desires, because making mental calculations of value becomes more difficult and therefore decisions to allocate capital become based on more arbitrary premises. In this current economy, value and price are completely discrete.

The end result is that holders of capital, instead of taking risk and buying an ice cream machine or building a new factory, buy gold, silver and platinum while waiting for calmer days. When the devaluation of intrinsically worthless fiat currencies happens it will likely be extremely quick.

THE GREAT CREDIT CONTRACTION

I really wish this liquidity pyramid could accurately convey all I want but it gets the main point across. During a credit contraction capital, both real and fictitious, burrows down the pyramid into safer and more liquid assets. The illusory capital evaporates.

… the riots in Greece are the prelude not the encore …

What happened on Thursday? Capital burrowed into FRN$ Treasuries and gold. Gold is now perched atop a near record all-time high around $1,210 per ounce.

As reported by Bloomberg, the EU’s $645B fund to fend off the ‘wolfpack’ will be like a decrepit brontosaurus trying to fend off 100+ hungry velociraptors. Europe is too old, too beauracratic, too slow and fighting economic law to be able to mount a sufficient defense. The little baby velociraptors, hatched with the merger of bank, currency and state through ignoring Article 1 Section 10 Clause 1 of the United States Constitution and the establishment of the unconstitutional Federal Reserve, have now grown up and they have unlimited avarice to feed.

But I think the real value is to be found in buying platinum which, during the past week, got cheaper when priced in gold. A likely scenario will be a summer consolidation or pullback in gold, silver and platinum and then starting in August the trek towards $1,650 gold with the bulk of the upleg happening in November.

There will come a time to buy the S&P 500 and real estate with one’s monetary metals but that time is still a few years away. In the meantime, the name of the game is to retain the capital and purchasing power already accumulated. Keep in mind, the riots in Greece are the prelude not the encore and will be coming to a city nearby before The Great Credit Contraction is over.

CONCLUSION

The entire worldwide financial and economic system are built on an illusion. Neither I nor other prepared individuals really care if the stock market crashes 700 points in ten minutes. What is going on is fairly simple economic law which I discuss in The Great Credit Contraction. While the time to buy the precious metals at a good value was earlier there is still incredible reasons to at least have some material portion of one’s net worth allocated to them.

After all, whether the fire of inflation or even hyperinflation or the ice of deflation that freezes the global economy in its tracks a holder of capital will be protected when ensconced within a golden forcefield. And the monetary metals can do wonders for reducing blood pressure when watching Iceland, Greece, New York or LA on television.

DISCLOSURES: Long physical gold, silver and platinum with no interest in DOW, S&P 500, the problematic SLV ETF, gold ETF or the platinum ETFs.

Liquidity on the Currency Futures vs. the Nifty Futures

India is the second country of the world, after Brazil, where the currency futures are more liquid than the currency forwards. Today when I glanced at the order book of the near month rupee-dollar futures, I was struck by the big numbers that are visible:

The tick size of this market is 0.25 paisa, so the top five prices cover 1.25 paisa on each side. So there’s nothing interesting about the prices: I focus on the quantities. I’m used to generally seeing quantities at each prices running all the way to 1000 to 2000 contracts which is $1m to $2m. Today I was surprised to see two quantities with much bigger values: $6m and $11.3m. This is huge. [NSE currency futures page; the order book for this (April) contract] I was also impressed at the fact that $32.6m and $42.4m of orders are sitting on this order book. These are big numbers.

For a comparison, I popped over to look at the April expiration Nifty futures contract, which is the biggest financial product in India. This order book shows:

This contract is five times bigger than the currency futures contract, so in your mind you have to multiply the quantities by five to make them comparable. So the big two quantities here are around 2000 contracts which corresponds to 10000 contracts of the currency futures contract. The total orders present on the book here are staggeringly large when compared with the currency.

Theory tells us that liquidity should vary with asymmetric information and volatility. Both Nifty and the currency are macroeconomic underlyings with relatively little asymmetric information. But Nifty is more volatile. So if both markets worked well, we would expect Nifty to be less liquid. We are not yet there – the currency futures market is not yet more liquid than the Nifty futures market. Some key differences are obviously visible: foreigners trade on the Nifty futures but are banned from the currency futures, and Nifty options are available while currency options are not yet available (though without foreigners).

A paper idea: When a central bank shifts to a more transparent framework on currency trading, or when a central bank steps away from currency trading altogether, asymmetric information on the currency market goes down so currency impact cost should go down. I wonder if one can find some natural experiment of this fashion. Matters are complicated because the date on which a float commences if often not the date on which the float is announced. This can be dealt with by identifying the date on which the exchange rate regime actually changed, as opposed to what is claimed by the central bank.