<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Citizen Economists &#187; retail competition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/tag/retail-competition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs</link>
	<description>Citizen Economists is an online economics magazine written by citizen journalists. These ordinary citizens provide reports and commentary on the current events affecting the economics of the fields they work in.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:10:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is America&#8217;s power shrinking?  Who Cares?</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/07/31/is-americas-power-shrinking-who-cares/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/07/31/is-americas-power-shrinking-who-cares/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Barr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics and Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American dominance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military prowess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=1093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Robert Kaplan&#8217;s article in the Atlantic concludes with this dire warning;</p> <p>Defense policy will be increasingly geared toward protecting the homeland, even as globalization makes for a smaller, more intricately connected world. America, in the final analysis, will be better protected, even as its global reach wanes.</p> <p>I am supposed to worry because&#8230; Maybe, <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/07/31/is-americas-power-shrinking-who-cares/">Is America&#8217;s power shrinking?  Who Cares?</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200903u/military-budget">Robert Kaplan&#8217;s article in the Atlantic</a> concludes with this dire warning;</p>
<blockquote><p>Defense policy will be increasingly geared toward protecting the homeland, even as globalization makes for a smaller, more intricately connected world. America, in the final analysis, will be better protected, even as its global reach wanes.</p></blockquote>
<p>I am supposed to worry because&#8230; Maybe, I&#8217;m just a left wing nut case, but isn&#8217;t the protecting the homeland the primary reason that most Americans are willing to spend hundreds of billions of dollars on the military. I didn&#8217;t realize the goal of US defense policy was to ensure that American diplomats get to sit at the cool table at international summits.</p>
<p>I have yet to hear a compelling argument why I should care about America&#8217;s global dominance. Even if China were to develop a military that could threaten ours, would it really be so bad? I don&#8217;t think anyone in either country is eager to start a war. Same with India, the EU or any other country that could theoretically challenge America&#8217;s military. (Not that anyone is even close to challenging us in this area.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/07/31/is-americas-power-shrinking-who-cares/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

