Ian Gordon: Hedging With Gold Against Imminent Economic Collapse

Ian Gordon After leaving the securities brokerage industry in 2009, Ian Gordon founded Longwave Analytics and Longwave Strategies to focus on protecting investors from what he believes is a global macroeconomic meltdown that is already underway. Gordon proposes that physical gold and certain gold stocks will be investors’ best hedge and overall solution to the worst financial crisis the world has seen. In this exclusive interview with The Gold Report, Gordon shares his thoughts on the current economic mess and how investors can take action now.

The Gold Report: You founded this firm based on your long wave theory that is based on the Kondratieff Cycle. How is this same or different from Kondratieff?
Ian Gordon: We have gone significantly beyond Kondratieff’s original thesis published in 1925. I am very proud that we have made the cycle far more encompassing than Kondratieff would have ever envisioned. For instance, one of the key things we have done is identify an investment cycle within the long cycle. This is an extremely valuable tool for investors, which allows them to make appropriate investment decisions in each quarter of the cycle.

TGR: Do you feel that you have legitimized the Kondratieff Cycle beyond theory and as a general principle?

IG: Well, I think we have. The proof is in the pudding. We have been able to recognize exactly where we are in the cycle and envision what the implications are likely to be. I think we have been able to pinpoint that with a great deal of accuracy the critical aspects of the cycle and how these relate to the economy and to investing.

TGR: You obviously can’t expect investors to wait through an 80-year super cycle. You’ve managed to isolate the bull and bear markets. Is that what you are saying?

IG: Yes, we have not only been able to isolate the bull and bear markets, but also we have been able to identify the best and most appropriate investments for each quarter of the cycle, and they generally work throughout that quarter. We have broken the cycle into the four seasons. We call it a lifetime cycle because it is 60–80 years, and each of its seasons is approximately 15–20 years, a quarter of the cycle. By the way, this is the fourth cycle, and it has always repeated pretty well the same in every cycle. Certainly essential investment decisions have been the same for each of the seasons in the cycle.

TGR: Take it from the beginning.

IG: Spring essentially renews economic growth. It is the rebirth of the economy following the winter of the cycle, which is the time when the economy dies and when debt is wrung out of the system. Because spring is the rebirth, stocks and real estate make appropriate investments and do very well for investors. We can show from our current cycle, which we maintain began in 1949, that the Dow Jones Industrial Average rises from 161 points at the beginning of spring and ends at 995 points at the end of spring. Of course, real estate also does exceptionally well during this period.

Then, following spring we move to the summer, which began in 1966 in our current cycle. We have always had inflation in summer because there has always been a war in this part of the cycle, and that war has always been financed through a huge expansion of the money supply. In the first cycle, it was the War of 1812. In the second cycle, it was the U.S. Civil War. In the third cycle, it was the First World War from 1914 to 1918. And, in the fourth cycle, it was the Vietnam War. With that inflation, stocks do not do that well and essentially make no gains. If anything, stocks end summer about 30% below the point from where they began. Conversely, gold performs exceptionally well, as do all commodities. Gold goes from $35/ounce (oz.) in 1966 to $850/oz. in 1980, and the Dow goes from 995 at the end of spring and ends the summer at 777 points. Real estate continues to do well in the summer of the cycle.

Four things always anticipate the onset of autumn in every cycle: These are the peak in interest rates; the peak in the consumer price index; the bear market in stocks such as the one that occurred between 1981 and 1982; and a recession. Now, autumn is always the point from which stocks, bonds and real estate perform the best in the cycle. It is the most speculative period in the cycle, and it is when debt really starts to build exponentially, and so gold performs very poorly in this portion of the cycle. In fact, gold prices go from that $850/oz. peak at the end of summer to $250/oz. at the end of autumn, and the Dow goes from 777 to 11,750 and real estate continues to perform very, very well. So, real estate has a three-season growth period and stocks have a two-season growth period, to the end of autumn, while gold has a one-season growth period.

The winter of the cycle, which we call the payback period, is when the economy dies. It goes into a deflationary depression overcome by the overwhelming debt in the system that has built-up principally through autumn. When we get into winter, we get very defensive and we move into gold, which performs exceptionally well, as do gold stocks. The general stock market performs abysmally. Between 1929 and 1932, the Dow lost 90% of its value. And, real estate also performs very, very poorly on account of the economic depression and the fact that homeowners have assumed huge mortgage debt to purchase their homes. During this time many people lose their homes because they are unable to make the mortgage payments. House prices decline to very low levels and in many cases mortgage debt is significantly higher than the value of the home.

TGR: Where are we in the cycle now?

IG: We are in the winter. The signal of the onset of winter was the peak in stock prices in January 2000 for the Dow and March 2000 for the NASDAQ. That was the end of autumn. And, yes, the Dow was higher than that in October 2007, but, again, that was really an abnormality created by paper money systems. The Federal Reserve was able to print copious amounts of money, pump it into the economy and revive the stock market after 2000 and into 2007. That money printing also contributed to the greatest real estate bubble in history and we know what the outcome of that bubble is.

TGR: I’m looking at your dire wintery target prediction that the Dow Jones Industrial Average will descend by more than 90% to 1,000 from current levels that are around 11,000. It sounds like a global economic meltdown of unseen proportions.

IG: Politicians are desperately trying to revive the economy by printing even more money. So, this bear market that started in 2000 continues in 2011. Normally bear markets last about one-third the time of the preceding bull market; obviously that has not been the case this time. So, we think when the end does come, it is going to be very traumatic. Eventually the Federal Reserve will lose control and will not be able to get the stock market reignited because it will reflect the reality in the economy. We think the Dow at 1,000 is probably a little optimistic. We think it could go below that to something like 500 if we were to emulate the 1929–1932 experience.

TGR: That translates into massive unemployment, does it not?

IG: It translates into an economy that’s basically a disaster: massive unemployment, huge bankruptcies, breadlines and a government that, in fact, can’t raise the cash to support the depression. Remember, going into the last depression the U.S. government was extremely wealthy, and America was the world’s largest creditor nation by a huge margin. The U.S. government debt had been paid down all the way through the 1920s, and it went into the last depression with government debt of only $16 billion. When the depression hit, the government had oodles of cash to throw at it to get the economy going. Yet it was never effectively able to do that. The Second World War brought us out of the depression.

TGR: Ian, I know you said gold will perform quite well in this kind of environment, and so I assume you believe there is much more upside yet for gold.

IG: Well, I do. One of the ways that we’ve always been able to measure where we think gold is going to go is simply using the Dow/Gold ratio, the value of the Dow Jones Industrial Average divided by the price for an ounce of gold. When this ratio reaches extreme highs, stocks have performed exceptionally well. So, we would anticipate that it would reach an extreme high at the end of spring of our current cycle, and so it did when it was about 28:1. In other words, it took 28 ounces of gold to buy the Dow Jones. And at the end of summer, gold performs well, and stocks don’t. It went down to a 1:1 relationship that was the lowest low, which we have seen twice. But, we are envisioning that we are going to go below 1:1 simply because we made an all time high at the end of autumn of 44:1. The decline must be in proportion to the advance. So, we think the decline is going to take us to something like a quarter to one (0.25:1), which is $4,000/oz. gold and a Dow of 1,000. We’re currently at about 6:1 on the ratio.

TGR: What about gold equities versus physical gold? Will gold equities climb this wall of fear into this winter cycle?

IG: Well, we know that between 1929 and 1936 gold equities performed exceptionally well. I think that the reason that they haven’t performed that well recently, particularly in the junior sector, is that [non-gold] stocks have generally performed pretty well aided and abetted by the Federal Reserve. If the bear market had followed its normal course, it should have ended in 2006, but it did not follow that normal course. So, once that bear market begins in earnest and once the Federal Reserve loses control of the stock market, we believe that the gold stocks will begin to mirror the actual price of gold, for which our forecast is $4,000/oz. And, that may be conservative because we believe that when the whole debt bubble continues to unravel that you won’t be able to obtain gold at any price. But at $4,000/oz., the gold stocks will perform exceptionally well.

TGR: This would be a dramatic divergence between gold equities and non-gold equities. What are your recommendations for investors?

IG: Well, we have always believed that you should definitely own the physical metal as well as the equities. And we have always had a big belief in the performance of the juniors because of the leverage that they provide to the price of gold.

TGR: Where do investors go? Which equities?

IG: Well, one that we like very, very much is Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. (BGM:TSX.V). The reason we like the company is that it is in production. It’s producing 25 thousand ounces (Koz.)/year of gold from its QR deposit in central British Columbia, Once it receive its permits to mine the Bonanza Ledge deposit, and that should be very soon, production will increase to 50 Koz. per annum. This makes the company very positive on a cash-flow basis. Barkerville is also finding and adding quite dramatically to its ounces in the ground position. It is going to bring in a second mill, and once that is permitted, production will rise to about 150 Koz./year. It is targeting 2013 for the second mill to be up and running.

TGR: Over the past 12 weeks, Barkerville is down 30%, and yet it still has a market cap of $100 million. It looks like shares have sufficient liquidity.

IG: I own a lot of it; it could be 30% of my stock portfolio.

TGR: So Barkerville would be your favorite?

IG: It’s my favorite, but there are also others that I like an awful lot. I love PC Gold Inc. (PKL:TSX) which I own. The company is in Pickle Lake, Ontario. I sort of trust Canadian mining, not because I’m a Canadian, but just because I feel it has been our heritage for so long. The Canadian government is always going to be a party to it. PC Gold has a very, very rich underground mine at Pickle Lake, and it has outlined about 1.2 million ounces (Moz.). PC Gold has also discovered a surface zone. It’s going to be a lower grade, but this gold in the ground has got to be worth something.

PC Gold hit $1.80 in April 2010, and I think it’s trading at around $0.47 right now. The other thing about PC Gold is that it has about $7.5 million in cash in the bank. So, even if we are in a major credit crunch, and I suspect we are, PC Gold has money to outlive a credit crunch and then get back on track and eventually be able to put its mine back into production.

TGR: The $7.5 million on its balance sheet represents about a third of its market cap.

IG: Right. We’re very keen on it and we own a lot of shares, all of which I bought in the market. I’m very happy to own this company.

Another one that we think a lot of is Colibri Resource Corp. (CBI:TSX.V). All of the Colibri properties are in Sonora, Mexico. One of its properties is very near La Herradura, which is owned by Newmont Mining Corp. (NEM: NYSE) and Fresnillo PLC (FRES:LSE). It’s a 12 Moz. deposit that consistently seems to stay at 12 Moz. In other words, as fast as the joint-venture partners mine the deposit, they replace it with new found gold. The Colibri property is about 12 km. from La Herradura and it has almost the identical geology to La Herradura. Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. (AEM:TSX; AEM:NYSE) is doing a joint venture earn-in on that property. So, you’ve got a major producer earning into that property and, if successful as Newmont and Fresnillo have been at La Herradura, it will take Colibri into production and hopefully find the 12 Moz. plus that they’ve found at La Herradura. I think it is very, very cheap. Agnico owns just under 20% of the company and Sprott Asset Management owns just under 20% and my wife and I own just under 10%. So, effectively, that’s half of the company’s shares. Colibri has about $2 million cash, and it has an excellent board.

TGR: I’m looking at Colibri’s market cap of about $7.2 million. I’m thinking that would scare a lot of people off.

IG: Well, I’m not scared off because Agnico is not going to allow this company to flounder. I’m sure it’s going to support it. And I don’t think Sprott is going to allow this company to flounder given the fantastic assets that it has.

Another company that has just gone on our website is Terraco Gold Corp. (TEN:TSX.V). I own shares in the company and I really like Terraco. It owns 100% of a property in Idaho called the Almaden Project, which it bought from a company in financial distress. The property has just under 1 Moz. already defined in an NI 43-101. Again, this company has a very, very strong board. Terraco has another property in Nevada, the Moonlight Project, which adjoins the north side of Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX:TSX; ABX:NYSE) and Midway Gold Corp.’s (MDW:TSX.V; MDW:NYSE.A) Spring Valley Project. We think that this company will do exceptionally well for shareholders.

TGR: Was there one more you wanted to mention?

IG: Actually there are several other companies that I like, but let me mention a couple more and give you the names of some other companies that I own. I am particularly fond of Temex Resources Corp. (TME:TSX.V; TQ1:FSE), which has all its properties in Ontario. One of the properties has outlined an NI 43-101 resource of about 1.2 Moz. of gold. It is also now drilling and being very successful on a property that it has in the Timmins gold camp, of which it owns about 60%. Goldcorp Inc. (G:TSX; GG:NYSE) owns 40%. So, that particular mine was the richest mine in the Timmins camp. I own a lot of shares, and I have just purchased more shares in a private placement that the company is now doing.

Another company that I have long owned and think will ultimately perform very well for shareholders is Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. (GNG:TSX.V; GGTHF:OTCPK). The properties are all in Mexico and several have had significant past producing gold and silver mines on them. Agnico-Eagle owns about 8% of the company’s shares and Sprott Asset management owns a little less than 20%. The company is working toward a joint venture agreement with Agnico-Eagle on its Las Bolas property.

Other companies that I own and like are African Queen Mines (AQ:TSX.V), Fire River Gold Corp. (FAU:TSX.V; FVGCF:OTCQX), Freegold Ventures Limited (FVL:TSX), and Northern Freegold Resources (NFR:TSX.V). All these companies have significant gold in the ground assets. Fire River Gold is in production. I would encourage prospective investors to visit the companys’ websites and read through the corporate presentations and even to phone the presidents of companies before they make a decision to purchase shares.

TGR: My final question is, how long will winter last?

IG: It will last until the debt has been eradicated from the economies of the world. So, to give it a date is difficult. If the whole world monetary system collapses under the massive mountain of debt that has accumulated worldwide, then it will happen reasonably fast, and a new world monetary system will evolve. I think that new system will be based on gold.

TGR: Ian, this has been very valuable. Thank you.

IG: Thank you very much for having me.

A globally renowned economic forecaster, author and speaker, Ian Gordon is founder and chairman of the Longwave Group, comprising two companies—Longwave Analytics and Longwave Strategies. The former specializes in Ian’s ongoing study and analysis of the Longwave Principle originally expounded by Nikolai Kondratiev. With Longwave Strategies, Gordon assists select precious metal companies in financings. Educated in England, Gordon graduated from the Royal Military Academy, Sandhurst. After a few years serving as a platoon commander in a Scottish regiment, he moved to Canada in 1967 and entered the University of Manitoba’s History Department. Taking that step has had a profound impact because, during this period, he began to study the historical trends that ultimately provided the foundation for his Long Wave theory. Gordon has been publishing his Long Wave Analyst website since 1998. Eric Sprott, chairman, CEO and portfolio manager at Sprott Asset Management, describes Gordon as “a rare breed in the investment-advisor arena.” He notes that Gordon’s forecasts “have taken on a life force of their own and if you care to listen, Gordon will tell you how it will all end.”

Interview With Ian Gordon

TRACE MAYER: Welcome back to episode #55 the RunToGold.com Podcast, I’ve got with us today a special guest, Ian Gordon from the Long Wave Group. Welcome Ian.

IAN GORDON: Thank You very much for having me.

TRACE: Great. To start off with the latest news, why do you think that the gold price is taking this rapid jump of about of $60  per ounce over the last week.

IAN: I have never really that concerned about the “machinations” at work. I am extremely bullish on the gold price basically because I think the world is falling into the deflationary depression of the 1930’s and because of that I do not really worry about what is happening in the short or intermediate term. I think we are going to see much higher prices anyway. But I guess if I was to give you an answer I suspect it might be that India is buying the International Monetary Fund gold.

TRACE: 200 tons!. Usually that is trotted out by the gold cartel as “Oh, we are going to sell the IMF Gold and the price will go down. But in this case, India bought about half of what was available. I suppose that China is probably waiting in the wings to buy the remaining amount. Why do you think it is that India is willing to allocate this small percentage of their foreign reserves to purchase the IMF’s gold.

IAN: Well, I think that gold as money is going to shift to the wealthy countries and it is shifting out of the United States because the IMF is essentially run by the United States and is moving to the wealthy countries of the east. And that is where the wealth of the world is moving as well.  I think that for a country like India it has to put more of its reserves and it already has cause it only has a minuscule amount into gold because other reserves are in the dollar and you know what is been happening to that. Basically anyone invested in the dollar is being badly hurt.

TRACE: Exactly. I could not agree with you more on these points. Now with the Long Wave Group you focus on long-term waves and particularly on the Kondratieff Winter. And actually we met at a Cambridge House Investment Conference and I think we were both presenting there. And I think we have a pretty similar viewpoint on what is happening. “What is the Kondratieff Winter and the theory that under girds a lot of your work.

IAN: Okay my work is developed around Kondratieff Cycle that was promulgated by Nikolai Kondratieff, a Russian economist in the mid-1920’s.  It is a long economic cycle and he based his theory on prices, on the movement of trade, on money movements and inflation and so on. And he came up with this idea that capitalism really underwent this long cycle of expansion and contraction.  That the cycle lasted about 60 years, so first half of the cycle is really the expansion phase, and the second half is the contraction phase, and the last quarter of that contraction phase essentially is the depression- a deflationary depression stage in the cycle.

TRACE: Now, just an interesting tangent what ever happened to Mr. Kondratieff?

IAN: Well, Stalin sent him to gulag and he died in about 1938 in the Gulag. I mean some people had it that he was executed but what I read was that he actually just died in the gulag.

TRACE: It would be funny if it were not so sad that we had these political leaders, really just criminal gangs that strut around in their costumes, and yet when somebody comes along and does have a theory, like Galileo for example, and it explains how the world really works then the common response to that is to shove them in the gulag. And Mister Kondratieff was not any different than a lot of the very insightful thinkers that we have seen over the last century.

I noticed from your report that I read, “All That Glitters Is Gold” that you say:

The velocity of money will essentially come to a standstill … In deflation, as in the 1930s, those few people with money curtail their spending in the knowledge that prices will be lower tomorrow.

Could you please expound on that?

IAN: Most people today are basing their assumptions on the Federal Reserve printing and assuming that that monetary printing is going to lead to inflation. And most of the bullish gold analysts are bullish because they see inflation coming in to the economy. We are of the opposite view. We believe that we are going to have deflation and in fact massive deflation in the economy. And to have inflation you have to increase the money supply.  But to have an increase in the money supply the money has to transfer to the people who want to spend it. And to spend it as fast as you can because what they see ahead of them is just rising prices so they buy today rather than pay the high price tomorrow.

What happens in deflation is people do not spend but instead hoard money because they see lower prices tomorrow and they would rather wait for the lower prices.  A deflationary environment always sort of happens when the economy is really really bad. And we are going into the Kondratieff Winter or deflationary depression stage and people are scared.  Because they are scared they are not going to be spending money but the Federal Reserve and the central banks around the world want them to do. They are going to be hoarding the money which we see with the banks. The banks are not lending money out and they are hoarding it to improve their capital base.  So we do not get the fast movement of money in this kind of environment and therefore the velocity of money slows tremendously.

TRACE: And actually I think I have used the term “FROZEN”. But to take the other side of the argument, which I will do here, is not all of the these bank reserves just pent-up demand that will is like flood waiting to happen as soon as the dam bursts. Is not that not the argument of the inflationists. As soon as all these bank reserves finally burst through the dam and they begin lending again then we are going to have tremendous inflation and gold is sensing this future inflation and that is the reason it is rising. How do you respond to that type of argument?

IAN: Well, we have only just begun the real payback period. You know the whole purpose of the Kondratieff Winter or  deflationary depression part of the cycle is the washing out of the debt has been built up throughout the cycle. And our present cycle started in 1949 but the main build up of debt occurs in what I call the autumn of the cycle.

And the autumn started in 1982 and that is where the banks really started to make money available to consumers and corporations so there was a huge amount of borrowing that goes on starting in 1982 but it really reached its peak essentially in 2007. And that big borrowing was lent to people who will never have the ability to pay it back. And we can see it in the housing crisis that is now going on  in the United States and which we will see go through it in Canada even though most Canadians have believed that w ill not.

When that happens, all that debt starts to come out of the system. So that is money coming out of the system. And so the banks have been hit hard once on the sub-prime mortgage debacle. They are going to get hit hard again on other kinds of debt like commercial real estate. We are already seeing credit card debt starting to hurt some. So there is a massive amount of debt that is going to have to be taken out of the system.

You look at the United States and there is about $58 trillion of government debt.  W have abut $44 trillion of consumer, corporate and financial debt. And about half of that debt is going to be washed out in the winter. I thought of conservatively estimated that it will be about $22 trillion but I suspect it is going to be more.

But $22 trillion, the Federal Reserve does not have the power to print that kind of money so that even if they did print $22T then we would simply be at the same place we are now. We would not have really increased the money supply.  Well that is really what is going to happen is that were going to have a massive decrease in the money supply and the amount of deflation like we did in the 1930’s because the debt problems are the same. It was not as bad as then as it is today. And in fact, back in the early 1930’s we had a 30% deflation occurring in the United States. And I see a similar kind of situation happening this time.

TRACE: Now, this is an interesting issue that I address right off the bat in my book The Great Credit Contraction. And it is, what is money? And so I actually like to distinguish money from currency. Currency being the tool or instrument that we use on our ordinary daily transactions. And currency can either be money, money substitutes or an illusion.

Money has to be a tangible assets such as gold, silver, platinum, etc., and a money substitute would be, say a gold certificate like we had in 1933. And an illusion is just some made up little green paper tickets or digits in some database such as Federal Reserve Notes or Canadian Dollars or whatever these fiat currencies are.  Deflation under the Austrian school of economics definition is a decline in the money supply, or I would say the currency supply.

Could we have the illusions actually increase in supply to help support more of these gigantic inverse liquidity pyramid that is on top of it OR is your argument that even if the Federal Reserve tries to increase that the currency supply, which are illusions, that the capital will still go lower into something safer and more liquid, primarily gold, and that there is nothing they can do to stop this and therefore the evaporation of the liquidity pyramid because the earning capacity of the worldwide economy just is not substantive enough to support the service of all the debt.

IAN: We have all seen Exter’s inverse pyramid and I have a copy on my website. I know you have developed your own inverse liquidity pyramid and both have in common that at the bottom of the pyramid is gold. Gold is the ultimate currency that people have trusted. And that is really what we are already seeing with the move to gold. There is not any inflation. Yet, there has been a massive move to gold causing the gold price to close in on $1,100 per ounce. So people are buying gold and hoarding gold because they are fearful of what is transpiring.

TRACE: So we see for example the evaporation of auction rate securities, commerical mortgage backed securities or money marketsand those like cash instruments we are seeing people move into are either Treasury Bills or going a step further like the Indians and saying just give me two hundred tons of physical gold bars in my hand.

IAN: Exactly.

TRACE: Fear is definitely a powerful motivator. Now, I would like to tease out another one the quotes from that report you sent me:

Once the debt bubble is unwound, it is deflation in nature because it is painful and results in bankruptcies on both side of the ledger.  Actually, it takes money out of the system and during our Kondratieff Winter, trillions of dollars of debt will be expunged.

Now we talked a little bit about the latter part but how about the former.  When you talk about it resulting in bankruptcies on both sides of the ledger, what exactly do you mean?

IAN: I mean both the creditors and the debtors are going to be bankrupt. And we have already seen that. We have seen the creditors like the major banks both in the United Kingdom and in the United States being severely impeded by the credit bubble bursting. And we have seen the debtors being severely hurt as well. We have seen General Motors go bankrupt, Chrysler go bankrupt, and that is just the beginning because as they say, the next shoe has to drop. What we have seen really in this recovery phase in the markets and so on is very similar to the recovery phase that we saw 1929 to April 1930.

When the Federal Reserve of that time was really frightened by the crashing stock market and they pushed money into the banking system at a horrendous rate.  According to Murray Rothbard in his book, America’s Great Depression, in one week the money supply was increased by 10%. And they brought down interests rates in 6 weeks from 6% to 3.5%.

That got the things going again and it got particularly the stock market going again so we got a recovering stock market from November 1929 to April 1930. And essentially 50% of the losses that occurred before that were recovered.

But the whole thing is that the debt that was underpinning the economy had not been paid back.  So the real fragile state in the economy was the debt bubble. That had occurred throughout the 1920’s and it is in the same position today. So we have had a recovery in the stock market and I believe that recovery is over. And we are now going to the next level down in stocks much as as we did after April 1930.

TRACE: A few months ago I wrote about the coming market crash.  We have actually already seen the Dow break down below 9 ounces of gold for the Dow, just recently. Now, back to this part about bankruptcies on both sides of the ledgers.  I have written about bankrupting for profit and fair value lying standards with the mark-to-market FASB 157 affecting or being applied in keeping some of these zombie institutions alive.

IAN: Well, I think we are seeing it through sleight of hand. Basically, the values of the derivatives that they have on the books have been sort of pushed under the rug and hidden from view so that we are not really going to be a apprised on what the real situation is in the banks.

TRACE: And that perhaps is one of the reasons that we are seeing the bank reserves so high is that all the banks have an incentive to understate their liabilities under FASB 157 and yet at the same time overstate the assets but really the liabilities that one bank holds are an asset of another bank and therefore all the banks know that everybody is lying. And because of that therefore everybody is sitting on a lot of their capital in the form of bank reserves. Would you say that is a fair assessment?

IAN: I think so. Yes. Absolutely right on.

TRACE: OK. I got another quote I found very interesting in that report you sent out:

When that occurs as in 1873 and 1929, and now there is fear and panic. In all panics, there exists an instinctive will in all of us to survive and succor loved ones. Like always, the the paper money system collapsed and gold replaced it.

And so, in my book The Great Credit Contraction, I addressed the issue of Peak Oil. And so I was wondering exactly how bearish of the general worldwide economy are you?  Obviously you are bullish about the precious metals but how bearish are you on the worldwide economy and perhaps the standard of living for example?

IAN: Well, I am very bearish.  Again we go back to the 1930’s to use that as the measuring stick for what we might expect this time around. And in the 1930’s, the U.S. economy contracted by about 45%, or GDP drop by 45%. Now, I think its going be bigger this time because the debt level is significantly larger now than it was in 1929. But assume that 45% drop from $14T to $8T. So that is a huge, huge drop.

And it means that people are far poorer than they have ever been and an awfully lot of them are not going to be working. In the US in 1933 about 25% of the work force was unemployed and a much larger percentage of the workforce was employed in agriculture.

TRACE: It seems like you are not as bearish as some of people out there. For example, we have extremely complex systems. And when the Federal Reserve intervenes in determining both the money supply and the cost of money through interest rates it amounts to central economic planning. And that central economic planning may have worked when the economy was so simple with for example some thug coming in and saying well you can only sell your cow for a certain amount.

But now we have these hugely complex systems were we drill 5 miles into the ocean to extract oil. And then spray that oil onto our fields as herbicides, pesticides, and fertilizers to grow our food, and then we put the oil in trucks and to get the food into the supermarket.  We have these hugely complex systems with central economic planning and that central economic planning is now failing. And there is a branch within the peak oil group that talks about die-off.  What Obama is doing now is really trying to duplicate what President Roosevelt did.

President Obama and the Federal Reserve think that they can centrally plan the entire economy.  Under Austrian Economics theory interest rates regulate production over time. And so, when we have the interest rates suppressed for the last 60 years we have produced a lot of things. Particularly the population of the world has increased tremendously.

Especially with peak oil and this complex systems that can fail do you see that we could perhaps have even a worse case scenario like some of those who talk about a die-off situation?

IAN: Well I do subscribe to the theory of peak oil. But again, I think the demand for oil is going to drop precipitously. Simply because non one’s gonna be working. Again if we use the idea that 45% of the U.S economy is going to be halted. That means essentially that the same kind of oil demand is the percentage dropping oil demand is also going to occur in the United States. And we are only picking on the United States because she has the largest economy in the world but we are all going be in be in the same boat.

So the whole world economy is going to drop by that kind of percentage.

TRACE: But not necessarily a precipitous enough drop that we could see 90% of the earth’s population washed away in this winter because of unsustainability?

IAN: Well, you are not going to see that because, as you know, there is a significant part of the world’s population who basically do not have anything anyway. If we go into Africa, or huge parts of China, India, etc. even though they are emerging nations they still have a large percentage of the population that are extremely poor.

So it is the wealthy nations that are really going to be hurt by this downturn and I think in particular, it is going to be WASP nations- United States, Canada, Australia and Great Britain, because that is probably where we saw biggest debt burden incurred.

TRACE: I agree.  I doubt we will see a die-of situation.  Thank you very much.  If people want to learn more about your work and your theory, how can they do that?

IAN: They can visit my website Long Wave Group.  Thank you very much Trace.