<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Citizen Economists &#187; government power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/tag/government-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs</link>
	<description>Citizen Economists is an online economics magazine written by citizen journalists. These ordinary citizens provide reports and commentary on the current events affecting the economics of the fields they work in.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:10:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Federal Spending vs. Candidate Spending</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/02/09/federal-spending-vs-candidate-spending/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/02/09/federal-spending-vs-candidate-spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russ Nelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics and Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[candidate spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=3003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Seems like every handful of years, somebody starts yammering about how much money candidates spend to get elected. About how that spending is going up and up and up. And they claim that that&#8217;s a sure sign of corruption.</p> <p>Not likely. Look instead at the ratio of federal spending versus spending by presidential candidates <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/02/09/federal-spending-vs-candidate-spending/">Federal Spending vs. Candidate Spending</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like every handful of years, somebody starts yammering about how much money candidates spend to get elected.  About how that spending is going up and up and up.  And they claim that that&#8217;s a sure sign of corruption.</p>
<p>Not likely.  Look instead at the ratio of federal spending versus spending by presidential candidates over several decades:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://blog.russnelson.com/images/spending-vs-candidate.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>See how the ratio varies between 1 and 2.5?  That&#8217;s because candidates spend in proportion to the power they&#8217;ll have.  If you want them to spend less, expect them to do less and spend less of your own money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/02/09/federal-spending-vs-candidate-spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

