<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Citizen Economists &#187; goverment spending</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/tag/goverment-spending/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs</link>
	<description>Citizen Economists is an online economics magazine written by citizen journalists. These ordinary citizens provide reports and commentary on the current events affecting the economics of the fields they work in.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:10:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Economic Events on April 12, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/04/12/economic-events-on-april-12-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/04/12/economic-events-on-april-12-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B.P.T.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goverment spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Treasury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=3526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>At 2:00 PM EDT, the Treasury budget for March will be released.  The consensus is a deficit of $62 billion, after a deficit of $220.9 billion due to spending on stimulus projects and TARP outlays.  Historically, the U.S. Treasury has run an average deficit of $108 billion over the last 10 years, so if <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/04/12/economic-events-on-april-12-2010/">Economic Events on April 12, 2010</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 2:00 PM EDT, the Treasury budget for March will be released.  The consensus is a deficit of $62 billion, after a deficit of $220.9 billion due to spending on stimulus projects and TARP outlays.  Historically, the U.S. Treasury has run an average deficit of $108 billion over the last 10 years, so if the deficit is near the consensus, it will actually be unusually low.</p>
<span class="sfforumlink"><a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/forum/us-economics/economic-events-on-april-12-2010"><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/simple-forum/styles/icons/default/bloglink.png" alt="" /> Join the forum discussion on this post</a> - (1) Posts</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/04/12/economic-events-on-april-12-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Credit Where Credits Aren&#8217;t Due</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/01/26/credit-where-credits-arent-due/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/01/26/credit-where-credits-arent-due/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Knapp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics and Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goverment spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=2923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ilana Mercer concisely and elegantly makes a point that I&#8217;ve been harping on among big-L Libertarians for some time.</p> <p>&#8220;Targeted tax credits&#8221; aren&#8217;t &#8220;incremental moves toward liberty,&#8221; they&#8217;re just social engineering &#8212; shifting the tax burden from those who spend their money the way bureaucrats decide they should spend it, and onto those who <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/01/26/credit-where-credits-arent-due/">Credit Where Credits Aren&#8217;t Due</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ilana Mercer <a href="http://barelyablog.com/?p=20618" target="_blank">concisely and elegantly makes a point</a> that I&#8217;ve been harping on among big-L Libertarians for some time.</p>
<p>&#8220;Targeted tax credits&#8221; aren&#8217;t &#8220;incremental moves toward liberty,&#8221; they&#8217;re just social engineering &#8212; shifting the tax burden from those who spend their money the way bureaucrats decide they should spend it, and onto those who spend their money however they damn well please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/01/26/credit-where-credits-arent-due/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Points Americans Must Understand About the Economy</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/01/15/10-points-americans-must-understand-about-the-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/01/15/10-points-americans-must-understand-about-the-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thersites</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiat currency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fractional reserve system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goverment spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monetary supply]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[savings rates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=2839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>1. The interest rate is a price &#8211; the price of credit like the price of any good.  In a free market the price would be set like the price of any good at the intersection of the supply of funds (our savings), and demand for funds (businesses&#8217; and individuals&#8217; investing wants).  Instead, we <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/01/15/10-points-americans-must-understand-about-the-economy/">10 Points Americans Must Understand About the Economy</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. The<strong> </strong>interest rate is a price &#8211; the price of credit like the price of  any good.  <a href="http://www.auburn.edu/~garriro/natneut.pdf">In a free  market the price would be set</a> like the price of any good at the intersection  of the supply of funds (our savings), and demand for funds (businesses&#8217; and  individuals&#8217; investing wants).  Instead, we have an interest rate that is  arbitrarily picked by a handful of economists from the Federal Reserve Banks.   To repeat, one committee centrally plans the cost of credit, of which interest  rates on all debt are directly or indirectly based.<br />
<object id="cnbcplayer" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="400" height="380" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,0,0"><param name="_cx" value="10583" /><param name="_cy" value="10054" /><param name="FlashVars" /><param name="Movie" value="http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/action/player/id/1385370025/code/cnbcplayershare" /><param name="Src" value="http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/action/player/id/1385370025/code/cnbcplayershare" /><param name="WMode" value="Transparent" /><param name="Play" value="0" /><param name="Loop" value="-1" /><param name="Quality" value="High" /><param name="SAlign" value="LT" /><param name="Menu" value="0" /><param name="Base" /><param name="AllowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="Scale" value="NoScale" /><param name="DeviceFont" value="0" /><param name="EmbedMovie" value="0" /><param name="BGColor" value="000000" /><param name="SWRemote" /><param name="MovieData" /><param name="SeamlessTabbing" value="1" /><param name="Profile" value="0" /><param name="ProfileAddress" /><param name="ProfilePort" value="0" /><param name="AllowNetworking" value="all" /><param name="AllowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="380" src="http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/action/player/id/1385370025/code/cnbcplayershare" name="cnbcplayer" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="#000000" quality="best" wmode="transparent" scale="noscale" salign="lt"></embed></object></p>
<p>2. The Federal  Reserve has the monopoly power to print or inflate the money supply, thus  artificially lowering the cost of money (the aforementioned interest rate).   This means that they can (and always do) devalue the money in your pocket as  every dollar printed decreases the value of all dollars to come before them.   Inflating the money supply may not lead to an increase in prices if an equal or  greater amount of goods is produced, but the purchasing power of the dollar will  still be reduced because without printing money, your dollars would have been  able to buy more goods.  Alternatively, if more dollars are printed than goods  are produced, prices will increase though not necessarily uniformly across all  goods.  Inflation may not manifest itself in explicitly higher prices but merely  impede prices from falling for certain goods as they would were the money supply  to remain constant.</p>
<div style="text-align: center; clear: both;"><a style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" href="http://dollardaze.org/blog/posts/00747/ValueOfOne1913Dollar.png"><img src="http://dollardaze.org/blog/posts/00747/ValueOfOne1913Dollar.png" border="0" alt="" width="320" height="181" /></a></div>
<p>3. When you deposit money in a regular checking  account, the bank doesn&#8217;t hold onto this money.  Banks only keep a small  percentage of the money you deposit on hand in their reserves, lending the  majority of the money you (or the Fed for that matter) deposit to others who  lend it to still others and so on, in the process substantially increasing the  money supply.  This is known as <a href="http://news.goldseek.com/GoldSeek/1249625340.php">fractional reserve  banking</a>.  If everyone in America or even a decent percentage of Americans  tried to take their money out of the bank on a given day, millions would be  unable to access their cash.  Effectively, even with FDIC Insurance, <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/frb.html">all of the banks are  insolvent</a> as they do not hold anywhere near 100% of the money you deposit in  their vaults.  The hypothetical that the Fed could potentially print up money  for the FDIC to distribute is beyond the scope of this post.<br />
<object width="400" height="344"><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pC8I3J-1GSM&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p>
<p>4.  The government&#8217;s debt is merely an insidious tax like inflation.  Government  debt can only be paid down by taxing the people.  This tax can occur through  direct confiscation by government, or indirectly when holders of our  government&#8217;s debt demand a higher rate of interest, which in turn signals to  markets that our economy is not generating sufficient revenues to pay down the  debt, which leads to a perception of economic weakness and thus an increased  cost of borrowing for everyone in the economy.  If the government prints money  to pay down debt (which in and of itself should cause our creditors to flood the  markets with our debt and thus raise interest rates on everyone), this will  represent a tax on the people as well.</p>
<div style="text-align: center; clear: both;"><a style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_mFL_l0vr3pI/S0_g99M_z7I/AAAAAAAAALk/IGUmhouSzMQ/s1600-h/Picture+2.png"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_mFL_l0vr3pI/S0_g99M_z7I/AAAAAAAAALk/IGUmhouSzMQ/s320/Picture+2.png" border="0" alt="" /></a></div>
<p>5.  <a href="http://mises.org/daily/3231">Deflation</a>, or a decrease in the money  supply is the only <a href="http://mises.org/story/3296">antidote</a> to  inflation.  If the money supply is decreased, each dollar in your pocket becomes  worth more.  The concomitant fall in prices will correct the artificial initial  rise in prices from government printing of money.  In the process, since  decreasing the money supply increases the cost of money, unsustainable  enterprises with heavy debt loads will be put out of business, cleansing the  economy by freeing up unproductive resources.  Where debtors benefit from an  increase in the money supply because they can pay down their borrowings with  cheaper dollars, creditors will benefit from a decrease in the money supply  because they are paid back with more valuable dollars, which is one of the  reasons why government prefers to inflate as it can lessen its own debt load and  that of its constituents.  Deflation in prices while a symptom of deflation of  the money supply is also the natural result of increases in productivity, as  goods produced more cheaply in greater quantities (in the absence of money  printing) will lead to falling prices which benefits consumers.  The so-called  &#8220;paradox of thrift&#8221; that the MSM uses to vilify deflation in prices is  wrongheaded, as people will spend on all sorts of products knowing that over  time they will fall in price, as we have witnessed with numerous electronics  over the years.  Even during a depression, when asset prices fall to certain  levels there will necessarily be buyers, presumably those who saved prior to the  downturn.  And if people are paying off their debt and/or saving in a time of  falling prices in lieu of spending, this will be good for the economy because  deleveraging corrects the excesses of the boom and increasing the pool of  <em>real</em> savings lowers the interest rate and allows businesses and  individuals to borrow funds for investment at a lower cost, <em>legitimately</em> stimulating the economy.<br />
<object width="400" height="344"><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/a6E1k2YO9qU&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p>
<p>6.  The last point mentioned above is imperative.  Growth in an economy occurs when  real savings increase.  This is true whether in a booming market or a  depression.  In fact, saving is the only way out of a depression.  Saving  creates a pool of funds for banks to lend to businesses so they can expand their  capital, increase expenditures on R&amp;amp and generally take the  entrepreneurial risks necessary for innovation and growth.  Americans have long  consumed far more than we have produced, leaving us as massive net debtors to  the rest of the world.  The only way to get out of debt and expand our economy  is to save.  One cannot solve a problem of too much money and credit with more  money and credit.  This however is what our government is trying to do by  continuing to run the printing presses, trying to inflate our way out of  debt.<br />
<object width="400" height="344"><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5uKnPB43Dog&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>7.  Government cannot create wealth.  All it can do is take money from some people  and redistribute it to others.  Every dollar the government uses must be taken  from the private economy. Printing money to pay for things as we noted merely  devalues your dollars, effectively taxing you.  Government financing through  debt represents a claim on your wealth, a tax which as noted may be paid  directly or indirectly.  Thus, while federal, state and local taxes may appear  on a historical basis relatively low, the tax rate is deceptively masked by  excluding government bilking through inflation and debt.  In addition, all  government enterprises ultimately fail because government is not subject to the  profit and loss mechanism of the market and thus does not respond to the demands  of consumers, amongst other reasons.  In the process of failing, government  wastes resources that could be better put to use by private individuals.   Government is a wealth killer, not a wealth creator.</p>
<div style="text-align: center; clear: both;"><a style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" href="http://static.businessinsider.com/~~/f?id=4b43aad900000000006afad2"><img src="http://static.businessinsider.com/~~/f?id=4b43aad900000000006afad2" border="0" alt="" width="320" height="240" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center; clear: both;"><a style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" href="http://www.bearmarketcomparison.com/images/Unemployment-Rate-Bear-Market-Comparison-Great-Depression-Current-2008-2009.jpg"><img src="http://www.bearmarketcomparison.com/images/Unemployment-Rate-Bear-Market-Comparison-Great-Depression-Current-2008-2009.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="320" height="218" /></a></div>
<p>8. The purchasing of <a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/article/fed-balance-sheet-hits-new-record-major-mbs-purchases-over-past-month">all  sorts of less than creditworthy assets</a> from the big banks by the Federal  Reserve allows the government to pump money into the financial system, and  allows the banks to foist assets it doesn&#8217;t want onto the back of the taxpayer.   When we combine these asset purchases with the rest of the wasteful deficit  spending on government jobs and reckless bailouts of the financial institutions  and auto companies, our appraisal of the situation is as follows: while the  little guy delevers, the government counteracts this necessary private balance  sheet cleansing by levering up its own balance sheet at the expense of the  taxpayer,  for the benefit of the financiers and the unions.</p>
<div style="text-align: center; clear: both;"><a style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" href="http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/volcker/Fed%20Balance%20Sheet%20January%2013.jpg"><img src="http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/volcker/Fed%20Balance%20Sheet%20January%2013.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="320" height="204" /></a></div>
<p>9. The real estate problem in our economy  centers on the fact that people owe more money on their mortgages than they are  able to pay down.  The only fix to this problem is for people to either generate  more income to service their mortgages, or default.  Any intervention to keep  people in homes they can&#8217;t afford will merely perpetuate market imbalances,  propping up the value of real estate and preventing qualified buyers from  purchasing homes at fair prices.  There will be no true recovery in the  mortgage-backed securities  market until the forces of supply and demand sort  out this mess (a mess which will be made worse as there are continued resets in  mortgage rates over the coming years).  The same goes for any of the other  assets whose values were bid up to unjustified levels because of easy money and  credit.</p>
<div style="text-align: center; clear: both;"><a style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" href="http://dailyreckoning.com/files/2009/12/DRUS12-17-09-9.GIF"><img src="http://dailyreckoning.com/files/2009/12/DRUS12-17-09-9.GIF" border="0" alt="" width="320" height="270" /></a></div>
<p>10. Our economic crisis at the most basic level  occurred because too much money and credit were pumped into the economy, given  that again the interest rate was set artificially low not by supply and demand  in the market but by government fiat.  The recession signals that we must fix  the distortions and malinvestments resulting from the centrally planned interest  rate. The healthy path to recovery is to allow prices to fall (aided by debt  repayment), liquidate failed enterprises (reallocating of land, labor and  capital to more productive and profitable lines of business) and encourage  saving to increase the pool of loanable funds for economic expansion. Any  actions to the contrary (i.e. more or less all government policies being  implemented or bandied about) will merely prolong the pain.</p>
<div style="text-align: center; clear: both;"><a style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" href="http://www.auburn.edu/~garriro/cbm.gif"><img src="http://www.auburn.edu/~garriro/cbm.gif" border="0" alt="" width="320" height="210" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left; clear: both;">Note that this is by  no means a comprehensive study of the above subjects, but rather a cursory look  at essentials that the American public must grasp before we can ever expect to  return to prosperity.</div>
<p><span style="font-size: 95%;"><br />
</span></p>
<span class="sfforumlink"><a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/forum/economic-theory/10-points-americans-must-understand-about-the-economy"><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/simple-forum/styles/icons/default/bloglink.png" alt="" /> Join the forum discussion on this post</a> - (1) Posts</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/01/15/10-points-americans-must-understand-about-the-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clunkermania:  Top Good News Economic Story of the Year</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/08/31/clunkermania-top-good-news-economic-story-of-the-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/08/31/clunkermania-top-good-news-economic-story-of-the-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eldon Mast</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash for clunkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goverment spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=1782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> </p> <p>Last week marked the end of the Cash for Clunkers program. Many have called it one of the best economic stimulus programs ever implemented. Of course the White House has called it &#8220;Wildly Successful.&#8221;</p> <p>&#8220;This is one of the best economic news stories we’ve seen and I’m proud we were able to <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/08/31/clunkermania-top-good-news-economic-story-of-the-year/">Clunkermania:  Top Good News Economic Story of the Year</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_xB5amgS4-MS-2WA5m7n8lnTC50/0/da"><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/91120_di" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_xB5amgS4-MS-2WA5m7n8lnTC50/1/da"><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/91120_di" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Last week marked the end of the Cash for Clunkers program.  Many have called it one of the best economic stimulus programs ever implemented.  Of course the White House has called it &#8220;Wildly Successful.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;This is one of the best economic news stories we’ve seen and I’m proud we were able to give consumers a helping hand,&#8221; said US Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood.</p>
<p>The White House Council of Economic Advisers, released preliminary analysis on the program:</p>
<p>1.  Their analysis estimates that the program will boost Q3 economic growth by 0.3-0.4 percentage points because of resultant automobile sales in July and August.</p>
<p>2.  The program will sustain the increase in Q4 GDP because auto production will continue in order to replace depleted showroom inventories.</p>
<p>3.  Clunkermania will create or save 42,000 jobs in the second half of 2009. It is further expected that those jobs will remain well after the program’s close.</p>
<p>The program, combined with <a href="http://mast-economy.blogspot.com/2009/02/stimulus-as-good-as-it-gets.html">earlier economic stimulus</a>, has second half economic growth <a href="http://mast-economy.blogspot.com/2009/08/second-half-growth-coming-on-strong.html">coming on strong.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/08/31/clunkermania-top-good-news-economic-story-of-the-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

