<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Citizen Economists &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs</link>
	<description>Citizen Economists is an online economics magazine written by citizen journalists. These ordinary citizens provide reports and commentary on the current events affecting the economics of the fields they work in.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:10:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Interesting readings for July 7, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2011/07/07/interesting-readings-for-july-7-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2011/07/07/interesting-readings-for-july-7-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 14:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ajay Shah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=8342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p> <p>The frontiers of Nifty.</p> <p>Next steps on the SEBI story: An interview with U. K. Sinha, by Puja Mehra and Rajiv Bhuva, in Business Today. Mobis Philipose in the Mint. Uproar over I-T raids on SEBI members, in Business Today. In probing SEBI board members, go by CVC rule: Abraham, by Sunny Verma, <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2011/07/07/interesting-readings-for-july-7-2011/">Interesting readings for July 7, 2011</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- India pol --></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hubbis.com/articles.php?aid=1309493377">The frontiers of Nifty</a>.</p>
<p>Next steps on <a href="http://ajayshahblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/interesting-readings.html">the SEBI story</a>: <a href="http://businesstoday.intoday.in/story/sebi-uk-sinha-idr-mutual-fund-entry-load-takeover-code-bimal-jalan/1/16420.html">An interview</a> with U. K. Sinha, by Puja Mehra and Rajiv Bhuva, in <em>Business Today</em>. <a href="http://www.livemint.com/2011/06/20213736/Is-8216go-slow8217-the-m.html?h=B">Mobis Philipose</a> in the <em>Mint</em>. <a href="http://businesstoday.intoday.in/story/income-tax-raids-on-sebi-members/1/16298.html"><em>Uproar over I-T raids on SEBI members</em></a>, in <em>Business Today</em>. <a href="http://www.financialexpress.com/news/in-probing-sebi-board-members-go-by-cvc-rule-abraham/803679/0"><em>In probing SEBI board members, go by CVC rule: Abraham</em></a>,<br />
by Sunny Verma, in the <em>Financial Express</em>.  <a href="http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/sebi-may-stick-to-its-guns-in-mcx-sx-case/439593/"><em>Sebi may stick to its guns in MCX-SX case</em></a> by N. Sundaresha Subramanian in the <em>Business Standard</em>.<a href="http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/sebis-abraham-emerges-front-runner-for-fmc-top-job/439573/"><em> Sebi&#8217;s Abraham emerges front-runner for FMC top job </em></a> by Ashish Rukhaiyar &amp; Sanjeeb Mukherjee in the <em>Business<br />
Standard</em>. An <a href="http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/chewingbubblegum/440206/">editorial</a> in the <em>Business Standard</em>. <a href="http://www.financialexpress.com/news/column-t-rowe-prices-dilemma/809663/0">Sunil Jain</a> on the problem of recruiting a UTI Chairman, in the <em>Financial Express</em>. <a href="http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/9020615.cms?prtpage=1"><em>SEBI looks to amend law to protect officials from investigative agencies</em></a> by Reena Zachariah, in the <em>Economic Times</em>. SEBI seems to have not <a href="http://profit.ndtv.com/news/show/sebi-hardens-stance-in-its-reply-in-mcx-sx-case-to-bombay-hc-162295">backed away</a> in the high court on MCX-SX.</p>
<p><a href="http://businesstoday.intoday.in/story/static-on-the-fm-channel/1/9505.html"><em>Static on the FM channel</em></a> by Puja Mehra, in <em>Business Today</em>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.indianexpress.com/news/that-seventies-feeling/804154/0"><em>That seventies feeling</em></a> by Pratap Bhanu Mehta, in the <em>Indian Express</em>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/shubhashis-gangopadhyay-whose-land-is-it-anyway/440332/">Shubhashis Gangopadhyay</a> in the <em>Business Standard</em> on land acquisition.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.shareable.net/blog/afghans-build-open-source-internet-from-trash-0">We should be learning from these Afghans</a>!</p>
<p><!-- Changing mores --></p>
<p><!-- India ec --></p>
<p><a href="http://www.firstpost.com/economy/the-ipo-market-is-down-and-that%E2%80%99s-good-news-for-investors-34332.html">A difficult patch in the Indian IPO market</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.livemint.com/2011/06/20214934/Is-past-record-a-measure-of-ef.html?h=B"><em>Saurabh Kumar</em></a> in the <em>Mint</em> on the extent to which IPOs from certain investment bankers are more exciting for investors than<br />
others.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.financialexpress.com/news/column-demystifying-swiss-banking/804214/0"><em>Demystifying Swiss banking</em></a> by Priti Patnaik, in the <em>Financial Express</em>.</p>
<p><!-- World ec. --></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin">Imagine there&#8217;s no central bank</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/06/inside-google-plus-social/all/1">Steven Levy</a> has a great story of how Google built Plus, in <em>Wired</em> magazine. And, PC World magazine on where and why <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/234825/9_reasons_to_switch_from_facebook_to_google.html">Google<br />
Plus is better</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/67885/sebastian-mallaby/can-the-brics-take-the-imf?page=show">Sebastian Mallaby</a> in <em>Foreign Affairs</em> on how emerging markets should play the appointment problem of the IMF MD.</p>
<div><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/e4434_19649274-4388520898641420903?l=ajayshahblog.blogspot.com" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></div>
<p><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/e4434_LwsfHKo6nPo" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2011/07/07/interesting-readings-for-july-7-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using Google Search to Measure Unemployment</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2011/05/27/using-google-search-to-measure-unemployment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2011/05/27/using-google-search-to-measure-unemployment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 21:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Gentry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine queries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=7846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So, this is cool. As reported in the Freakonomics blog, Google has a feature that allows users to correlate public patterns with search term usage. You supply data, such as initial unemployment claims, and Google will evaluate which search phrases best correlate with the data provided. Justin Wolfers reports,</p> <p>I fed in the weekly <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2011/05/27/using-google-search-to-measure-unemployment/">Using Google Search to Measure Unemployment</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, this is cool. As reported in the <a href="http://www.freakonomics.com/2011/05/25/mining-for-correlations-it-works/" target="_blank">Freakonomics blog</a>, Google has a feature that allows users to correlate public patterns with search term usage. You supply data, such as initial unemployment claims, and Google will evaluate which search phrases best correlate with the data provided. Justin Wolfers reports,</p>
<blockquote><p>I fed in the weekly numbers on initial unemployment claims—one of the  most important weekly economic time series we have.  The search term  that is most closely correlated? Crikey, it’s “filing for  unemployment.”  Indeed, the correlation is an astounding 0.91.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here’s the graph of time series on initial jobless claims and searches for “filing for unemployment”</p>
<div><img class="size-full wp-image-405" src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/8a976_Unemployment-predictor.png" alt="Google Searches and Unemployment Data" width="537" height="389" />Google Searches and Unemployment Data</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2011/05/27/using-google-search-to-measure-unemployment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forever Foraging for Fiber</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/12/15/forever-foraging-for-fiber/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/12/15/forever-foraging-for-fiber/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Briem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiber network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=5949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Not much recent local activity in the race to win Google&#8217;s Fiber contest, if contest is the right word.  Am I missing anything?</p> <p>A website fiberforall.org has a daily ranking of how someone out there thinks different communities are faring in their persistent post: Who is Winning the Google Fiber Race? [Updated Daily]</p> <p>How anyone <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/12/15/forever-foraging-for-fiber/">Forever Foraging for Fiber</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not much recent local activity in the race to win Google&#8217;s Fiber contest, if contest is the right word.  Am I missing anything?</p>
<p>A website fiberforall.org has a daily ranking of how someone out there thinks different communities are faring in their persistent post: <a href="http://fiberforall.org/google-fiber/">Who is Winning the Google Fiber Race? [Updated Daily]</a></p>
<p>How anyone comes up with that? and whether it means anything at all? Or more importantly does it mean anything to Google?  Who knows?  Let&#8217;s hope it means little because we are not doing so well.  The latest ranking of top communities showing community support has us nowhere to be found, which implies were even behind Scranton?? What is up with that?  As I type it says we rank #100!!</p>
<div><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_eE0bQo-kngw/TQg03ryKY1I/AAAAAAAABV8/Cfy3YBGdr3w/s1600/googlefiberDec142010.png"><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/92ab4_googlefiberDec142010.png" border="0" alt="" width="348" height="400" /></a></div>
<div>from fiberforall.org</div>
<div>Must be something we can do to move up that list..  other communties <a href="http://www.ktka.com/news/2010/nov/30/topeka-shows-google-love-downtown-celebration/">are way out there</a> in keeping up the ﻿effort.</div>
<div><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/92ab4_28045666-6632729899207187394?l=nullspace2.blogspot.com" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></div>
<span class="sfforumlink"><a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/forum/science-and-technology/forever-foraging-for-fiber"><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/simple-forum/styles/icons/default/bloglink.png" alt="" /> Join the forum discussion on this post</a> - (1) Posts</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/12/15/forever-foraging-for-fiber/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Earns Nearly $2B in Q4</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/01/22/google-earns-nearly-2b-in-q4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/01/22/google-earns-nearly-2b-in-q4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eldon Mast</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=2883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Google says that the advertising market is beginning to return to normal. And normal for them means close to a $2B quarterly profit.</p> <p>Their latest earning release also highlighted a 17% year on year growth in revenues &#8212; now up to $6.67B per quarter &#8212; from $5.7B per quarter during the same period in <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/01/22/google-earns-nearly-2b-in-q4/">Google Earns Nearly $2B in Q4</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google says that the advertising market is beginning to return to normal. And normal for them means close to a $2B quarterly profit.</p>
<p><a style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" href="http://techfreep.com/images/googleplex.jpg"><img src="http://techfreep.com/images/googleplex.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="200" height="130" /></a>Their latest earning release also highlighted a 17% year on year growth in revenues &#8212; now up to $6.67B per quarter &#8212; from $5.7B per quarter during the same period in 2008. Chief executive Eric Schmidt continues to make optimistic assessments of the current state of affairs.</p>
<p>&#8220;Given that the global economy is still in the early days of recovery, this was an <a href="http://mast-economy.blogspot.com/2009/12/consumers-are-driving-heady-q4-gdp.html">extraordinary end to the year</a>,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Our performance in 2009 underscored the strength of our management team, the resilience of our business model and the pace of innovation within our product and engineering teams, which continued unabated throughout the downturn.&#8221;</p>
<p>In a sign that <a href="http://mast-economy.blogspot.com/2010/01/us-retail-trend-on-mend.html">consumers are increasingly willing to spend</a>, more Internet users clicked on ads. The number of paid clicks on ads served on Google&#8217;s Web sites rose 13% from last year and 9% from the third quarter of 2009.</p>
<span class="sfforumlink"><a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/forum/business/google-earns-nearly-2b-in-q4"><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/simple-forum/styles/icons/default/bloglink.png" alt="" /> Join the forum discussion on this post</a> - (1) Posts</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/01/22/google-earns-nearly-2b-in-q4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

