<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Citizen Economists &#187; genetically modified food</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/tag/genetically-modified-food/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs</link>
	<description>Citizen Economists is an online economics magazine written by citizen journalists. These ordinary citizens provide reports and commentary on the current events affecting the economics of the fields they work in.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:10:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Genetically Modified Animals One Step Closer to Our Dinner Plate</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/26/genetically-modified-animals-one-step-closer-to-our-dinner-plate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/26/genetically-modified-animals-one-step-closer-to-our-dinner-plate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 02:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>R. C. Anderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetically modified food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On September 18, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a press release on a document regulating the use of genetically modified (GM) animals and products in the United States1. This document is open for public comment until November 18 and can be read here. In it, it states that GM animal developers are <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/26/genetically-modified-animals-one-step-closer-to-our-dinner-plate/">Genetically Modified Animals One Step Closer to Our Dinner Plate</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On September 18, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a press release on a document regulating the use of genetically modified (GM) animals and products in the United States<sup>1</sup>. This document is open for public comment until November 18 and can be read <a href="http://www.fda.gov/cvm/GEAnimals.htm" target="_blank">here</a>. In it, it states that GM animal developers are required to prove such animals are safe to the environment and for human consumption, as in the case of milk, cheese or meat<sup>2</sup>. Moreover, they must prove that the DNA change that has occurred in the animal as well as any products or repercussions from such a change is safe for the animal itself and the human population. Since this is a relatively new area with unknown implications, and the animals are changed on a genetic level, the FDA is proposing referring to these animals as “animal drugs.” According to Randall Lutter, the FDA’s deputy commissioner for policy, “the technology has evolved to a point where commercialization of these animals is no longer over the horizon<sup>3</sup>.”</p>
<p>What exactly is a GM animal, and what possible contributions could it make to our society? Achieved in the 1980s, GM animals are similar in many respects to GM plants. They both carry laboratory introduced DNA, or a gene, that is supposed to provide some benefit to the plant or animal. For plants, the new gene could provide insect or pesticide resistance. For animals, a new gene could increase the rate of maturity or have increased levels of important nutrients<sup>3</sup>. Other animals, referred to as “biopharm animals,” could be used to produce medicines for human diseases. Other versions, labeled “xenotransplant animals,” could provide tissue and organs so similar to human material that the chance of rejection would be minimal<sup>4,5</sup>. Even more categories of GM animals exist; however, they have been refused entrance to the consumer market. Aside from the obvious safety issues, many are afraid of what ecological damage could be done if one of these GM animals escaped into the wild. </p>
<p><b>Environment and Health Concerns</b></p>
<p>In 2002, the U.S. National Academies’ National Research Council grew concerned that the accidental introduction of one of these creatures could upset the current environmental balance<sup>6</sup>. If these GM animals were able to survive better and reproduce more quickly, they could push out the non-GM versions. Some are concerned not only about the environment but also their health, especially since the FDA has refused to require foods made with GM animals to be labeled as such, the same way they have refused to label food from GM crops<sup>5</sup>. </p>
<p>So far, only one GM animal has been released into the public realm. Although animals intended for food have not been released, in 2003, the fish Zebra danio was<sup>5</sup>. This fish was not meant to be eaten but to be seen. These modified fish, called GloFish, were able to glow in the dark and were something interesting for aquatic hobbyists. Animals meant for food could be released, however, if found to be safe. This could be particularly welcome if it could alleviate food shortages occurring around the world. Considering that most of the world, however, looks at GM crops with disdain and even horror, it is unlikely that GM animals would be received any more warmly.</p>
<p><b>Worldwide Benefits</b></p>
<p>If GM animals can succeed at the level GM crops have, even with so many people’s misgivings, prospects are optimistic indeed. In 2001, Bt cotton, for example, was able to grow with 50% less pesticide, or 10,500 metric tons, because it simply didn’t need it. Bt cotton allowed for more yield as well, increasing it by 25% in South Africa and 5% to 10% in China. For China, this equated to a gain of $500 million per hectare and $750 million nationally. In 2005, Syngenta, an agricultural biotechnology giant which sells GM seed, generated $8.1 billion while Monsanto believes their profits will climb to $8.5 billion in the next four years.</p>
<p>As for animals, cows have recently been genetically manipulated to prevent infection from mad cow disease. Considering the fear, both abroad and recently at home, of meat contaminated with this, resistant GM cows might deserve serious consideration. Furthermore, since the global population is expected to reach nine billion by 2040, the gains provided by GM crops and animals may become a necessity to continue feeding, clothing and medicating the world. With the apparently large amount of money that is on the brink of being realized by such an endeavor, there are sure to be numerous companies who will try to cash in on the idea.</p>
<p>References:</p>
<p>1 – <a href="http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2008/New01887.html" target="_blank">FDA press release on GM Animals</a><br />
<br />2 – <a href="http://www.fda.gov/cvm/GEAnimals.htm" target="_blank">Draft Guidance of GM Animals</a><br />
<br />3 – <i>Science</i>, September 18, 2008, <a href="http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2008/918/1?etoc" target="_blank">FDA Issues Guidelines for GE Animals</a><br />
<br />4 – <a href="http://www.fda.gov/cvm/GEfactsheet.htm" target="_blank">FDA GE Animal Fact Sheet</a><br />
<br />5 – <a href="http://www.fda.gov/cvm/GEconsumersQA.htm" target="_blank">FDA Consumer Q&#038;A</a><br />
<br />6 – <i>Science</i>, August 23, 2002, <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/297/5585/1257a" target="_blank">Environmental Impact Seen as Biggest Risk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/26/genetically-modified-animals-one-step-closer-to-our-dinner-plate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poor Countries Reject U.S. Answer to World Hunger</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/07/09/genetically-modified-food/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/07/09/genetically-modified-food/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Bunn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetically modified food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world hunger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amateureconomists.com/blogs/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;">At the UN summit in Rome, which ended June 5, the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FOA) appealed to governments to step up to the plate and provide at least $20 billion per year to help feed the world’s hungry.</p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;">On the agenda (at least for <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/07/09/genetically-modified-food/">Poor Countries Reject U.S. Answer to World Hunger</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="Times New Roman;">At the UN summit in Rome, which ended June 5, the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FOA) appealed to governments to step up to the plate and provide at least $20 billion per year to help feed the world’s hungry.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="Times New Roman;">On the agenda (at least for U.S. Agricultural Secretary Ed Schafer) was promoting the use of genetically modified (GM) foods, but the concept left a bad taste in some people’s mouths.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="Times New Roman;">Europe has been the main holdout to using GM foods. France, who is Europe’s number one producer of agriculture, passed a bill by a single vote to allow GM crops if and when the EU accepts them. Some European farmers are willing to give GM crops a try, as they are seeing the tangible (financial) rewards of GM crops.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="Times New Roman;">Some of the poorest countries who are most in need of food have rejected the use of GM foods as a way to ease the burden of hunger &#8211; which angers countries like the U.S. who commonly use GM crops to produce processed foods, oils, and corn syrup.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="Times New Roman;">So why are people so against using a technology that could help end world hunger by producing crops that are drought-resistant, insect and disease resistant, and that yields higher levels of nutrients?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="Times New Roman;">The answer is simple: people are afraid. GM foods have only been in existence for a few years. Although (thus far) there have been no reports of adverse effects, scientists are unable to say with any certainty that there will never be any ill effects from consuming foods produced from GM crops.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="Times New Roman;">The <a href="http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/13595.html" target="_blank">American Medical Association</a> states: “Worldwide, many people are eating GM foods with no overt adverse effects on human health reported in the peer-reviewed scientific literature and according to regulatory agencies.” In their adopted policy as of 2000, the AMA recognizes “the many potential benefits offered by genetically modified crops and foods, does not support a moratorium on planting genetically modified crops, and encourages ongoing research developments in food biotechnology.”</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="Times New Roman;">However, they once thought Thalidomide was the answer to the nauseated pregnant woman’s prayer.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="small;"><span style="Times New Roman;"> </span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/07/09/genetically-modified-food/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

