Indirect Revenue

I’ve been writing quite a bit recently on indirect taxation, and I thought that I would take a minute to look at things from the opposite side of the fence as it were. First, some context for my thoughts:

The state of Connecticut passed a new Internet tax law and contends that Amazon had a physical presence because it had affiliations with websites through its Amazon Associates program. Of course, Amazon dropped the Associates program in Connecticut to avoid having to collect the sales tax or fight that contention. In fact, the same scenario took place in California this year – so Amazon dropped its California Associates program to opt of that government scheme. The headhunting tax thieves from so many states are so focused on getting Amazon, this has come to be known as the “Amazon Tax.” Theft-seeking bureaucrats are fond of supporting their schemes as a logical move to combat an “unfair advantage” that they say online retailers have over brick-and-mortar retailers.

Many people generally only think about the direct taxes they pay when considering alternative tax policies (this being, of course, a form of the broken window fallacy). The same mindset is found in bureaucrats who, contrary to popular belief, are actually human.

Bureaucrats get excited about finding new ways to increase tax revenue, as was seen above with Amazon. They found a new way to charge taxes, or so they thought. There models assumed that Amazon would simply comply because they would not want to forego the extra profits found by selling through their associates in that state. Unfortunately, Amazon’s margins are pretty thin. So thin that, as Karl Denninger has observed, collecting sales tax will kill their competitive advantage. Thus, not having any business sense or, apparently, access to financial reports, Connecticut decided to charge Amazon sales tax because it had associates in the state. Amazon cut ties in order to avoid paying taxes.

As is readily obvious, Connecticut won’t be seeing the increase in tax revenue it’s expecting. But they should also see a drop in revenue from the income tax because associates are now not earning anything from being associates, and will therefore pay less. Some may even move out of state if being an associate was their main job in order to recoup their lost income. There should also be negative repercussions on sales tax revenue, since former associates will likely spend less money. Astute readers will note that this is basically the money multiplier effect being negatively applied to taxes.

What’s astonishing is a) how bureaucrats thought there was not a single chance that Amazon wouldn’t pay the new tax and b) how bureaucrats failed to account for the possibility of Amazon dropping the program. Quite simply, it is amazing how bureaucrats apparently did not even contemplate how their tax policy has indirect effects on other tax revenue. Their stupidity is simply astonishing.

eBay: The Giant Marketplace

eBay Facts

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

Holiday Retail: “Very Good Signs”

Retail executives were holding their breath on Friday, looking for indications that the recent recovery would extend into the holiday shopping season. Macy’s CEO Terry Lundgren went on the record with the Wall Street Journal Saturday to assert that early indications of both traffic and sales are pointing to “very good signs” for the December shopping season.

Online market reports from Coremetrics showed the average amount online shoppers spent on Friday rose 35% from last year’s Black Spending Friday. Top statistics included:

- Online Apparel retailers saw sales jump 28.6% from last year.
- Web-based jewelry sales reported nearly 25 percent surge.
- Online department stores did phenomenally well job reporting a 151.7 percent jump.

Overall consumer electronics are taking an early lead in sales volumes. Best Buy CEO Brian Dunn said that shoppers are in “a buying mood” and that “our crowds were materially bigger than last year.”

Toys “R” Us also pointed to big crowds favoring electronics. CEO Jerry Storch said that not only are electronics a big hit but with respect to early sales results: “So far we’re pleased. Friday morning we averaged over 1,000 people per store waiting in line, and we’ve been doing brisk business ever since.”

In general Friday’s results appear to be positive for holiday retailers. Given the big online surge on Friday that continued into Saturday, Cyber Monday is likely to follow suit. University of San Diego economics professor Alan Gin remarked over the weekend, “I think things will be surprisingly on the up side.”

The Economy of Cyberspace

U.S. retail Internet sales are expected to reach $146 billion in 2008, a 14.3% rise from 2007—and yes, that reckoning takes into account the economic downturn, which has actually boosted online sales because of high gas prices and reduced driving. While U.S. retail sales rose by 2.8% between the first quarter of 2007 and the first quarter of 2008, online sales rose by 13.6% during the same period. As for the shoppers who insist on buying from a brick-and-mortar establishment, eight out of ten first kick tires online.

In France, e-commerce is expected to reach US$32.4 billion this year, a 30% jump. In Brazil, the online retail market expanded by 43% in 2007, and 79% of all Brazilian Internet users have shopped online. In the UK, grocery shopping has moved online and 44% of the country’s Internet users have given it a go. In China, online shopping surged to US$8.2 billion in 2007, up 90% on the previous year.

If You’re Not Online . . .

These are staggering (and for retailers, mouthwatering) statistics. An even more astonishing one, however, comes from a January 2008 press release from The Nielsen Company: of the world’s population with Internet access, more than 85% have shopped online—approximately 40% of the total global population—and more than half of those online shoppers have made a purchase within the last month.

The fastest-growing segment of the global online marketplace is clothing, accessories and shoes with 36% of sales, but the most popular online purchase remains books with 41%. Other common purchases are movies, games, music, airline tickets and electronic equipment. Merchant trustworthiness is important to online shoppers, and many seek recommendations from friends or rating services or find a few sellers they trust and stick with them. The most popular payment method is a credit card (60%), with Visa the most often utilized, although 25% of buyers prefer Paypal, which may effect payment through a credit or debit card or through a direct bank transfer.

Many new buyers live within developing nations such as India, Brazil, Egypt and China and have such online payment services to thank for opening these new shopping horizons before them. When the goods these shoppers want can’t be found on the shelves of their local stores, they turn to the Internet and its international marketplace to fill that gap, and they’re often willing to pay a little more to a reliable seller or for shipment tracking.

The largest online retailer in 2007 wasn’t actually a single retailer but eBay, with a membership of over 83 million active buyers and sellers moving $60 billion worth of merchandise on website platforms in 28 countries around the world. As a comparison, Amazon.com had sales of $14.8 billion (both figures from 2007 annual reports). Because eBay sales are generally from individual to individual, international shipments are often marked as gifts to avoid customs duties, and the collection of state sales taxes on the Internet is notoriously difficult, leaving open the issue of lost governmental revenues worldwide. So are such individual purchases tracked as part of a nation’s balance of trade? If so, how?

. . . You’re Nowhere

A largely misunderstood aspect of the virtual marketplace is the foreign exchange, called the forex trading market. Although many people are only familiar with foreign exchange from traveling (or those money-making schemes advertised everywhere), the fact remains that sales across international borders generally involve crossing currencies as well. While credit cards and Paypal will exchange currencies for individuals for a fee, larger transactions must change through brokerages, which buy and sell currencies against each other on the open market.

The forex trading market is therefore comparable to those for stocks or commodities with one catch: it’s utterly virtual. There is no centralized exchange where brokers meet and bid against each other. Historically these deals were arranged via telephone, but often now they’re executed online with dedicated software trading platforms that track the prices of various currencies against each other to the fourth decimal place and graph the changes on a real-time basis. This increased efficiency has caused, well, a virtual explosion in forex trading, which by April 2007 had surged to an average daily turnover of $3.2 trillion dollars as tracked by the Bank for International Settlements.

There is much not yet understood about the economy of cyberspace, but it’s clear this is no longer a niche market, and retailers—and governments—will ignore it at their peril.