Private Debt Decline: Good For US, Bad for the Economy

I got a disturbing email from Bianco Research which showed a chart of “Private Credit Market Debt” which they say shows “Total credit market creation not including Treasury Debt, Municipal Debt and Agency Debt”.

It is actually a horror that the level of private debt peaked last year at about $36 trillion, which is certainly a lot of money, especially since total GDP of the Whole Freaking Country (WFC) is only $14 trillion (and falling!).

In some kind of bizarre “good news/bad news” joke, total private debt has now actually fallen by a couple of trillion dollars to $34 trillion, which is bad news for an economy that depends on consumption, but is good news in that people have lighter debt burdens.

David Stevenson of the Money Morning newsletter at moneyweek.com notes that it’s not just us, but “private borrowing is slowing everywhere” and that “US consumer credit has shrunk for a record 11 months in a row.”

The interesting thing is that the Bianco chart goes back to 1952, and there has never, ever been a time when private credit market debt fell by as much as a dime! Although it, sometimes, did not go up for short periods, nevertheless, it has never gone down. Never!

Until now. Oops!

Note that the soundtrack has gotten all gloomy, which makes sense, because if total private debt has – gasp! – gone down, then the money supply is not expanding because people are not borrowing to buy and invest. Oops!

Parenthetically, the money supply is not actually shrinking that much, as you would expect, because the asinine neo-Keynesian theory says that the government should replace private spending with deficit-spending, which they do, thanks to the Federal Reserve creating the money, which is another whole subject about which usually results in a loud Mogambo Scream Of Outrage (MSOO), which is, I think, more of a wail of anguish and crushing despair than a scream, although it usually concludes with me howling, wolf-like, “We’re freaking doooooooooommmmed!”

That’s, unfortunately, the bad thing that happens at the end of long booms produced by constant monetary stupidity, especially of the kind of stupidity found at the Federal Reserve, which explains why I say, with a loud, irritating repetitiveness that makes people run screaming from the room every time I open my mouth, to buy gold, silver and oil as your only defense against rampant government stupidity and insane levels of monetary over-creation of money and credit, as redundant as that actually is because of how incestuous they are.

I assume that you now understand the depth of the ignorance, stupidity and depravity of the government and the Federal Reserve (and, indeed, all the central governments and central banks of the world), and you are saying to yourself, “Hey! The Loud Mogambo Idiot (LMI) is right! Maybe he is not as stupid as everyone says!”

Fortunately, that knowledge is all that is required to be a Junior Mogambo Ranger (JMR), and now that you have begun on your path to economic enlightenment, I can let you in on a little secret; it’s going to get worse. Much worse. Much, much worse. Worse than anything, even that time when your First True Love (FTL) dumped you and started going out with that jerk from the baseball team, and how you still hate him for it, even after all this time, and you still love her in spite of it, even after all this time.

But you are not here to listen to my tale of love gone wrong, desperately loving someone who doesn’t love you, and rejects your aching heart over and over, and when you call her on the phone, her father answers and says, “My daughter says you are a creepy little rat-faced creep, so why don’t you just give up, kid?”

And so I did, on the spot, saying a final goodbye to her, through him, and with a tearful, heart-broken voice, and I told him to tell that scheming little lying two-faced cheating slut he calls his daughter, as a parting gift of wisdom from me, to “Buy gold, silver and oil when your idiotic government allows unrestrained creating of money and credit, and especially when the government deficit-spends said money to expand itself”, thinking, you know, that I would leave her with a fabulous piece of advice by which she could always remember me fondly.

Instead of him saying, “Well said, intelligent young man! I shall be honored to relay your wise advice to my daughter, and I shall act upon it at once myself!” he said, “What in the hell is that supposed to mean, you little punk?”

So I told him that he was obviously a moron about monetary policy, fiscal policy and raising demonic daughters and, judging by his reaction, burned another bridge behind me.

But I won’t need it! Hahaha! I have gold, silver and oil, and with them I can build all the new bridges I want, with riches untold, when his precious dollars and dollar-denominated assets turn into the crap that fiat currencies always become.

And his daughter, the tramp Carol? Now it shall be I who says, “Scram! Ya creep me out, loser weirdo!” Hahahaha!

Private Debt Decline: Good For US Bad for the Economy originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning.

Join the forum discussion on this post - (2) Posts

East Coast Blizzard Yields Silver Lining for Some

Mega-storms storms paralyze many businesses, but for others ice and snow spells big profits.

“All of our inventory has disappeared faster than concert tickets,” says Jon Hoch, owner of Power Equipment Direct Inc., an online dealer that has seen surging sales. Snow blowers inventory is now such that, “We have this beautiful Web site that in a day or two won’t have anything left to sell.”

For years the cab drivers in DC have taken advantage of snow situations. On Wednesday one traveler heading to Reagan National Airport said a cabbie tried to charge him a “$100 snow fare.”

In Pennsylvania, Jack Frost Big Boulder, Blue Knob, and Camelback ski resorts are all reporting premium skiing conditions. Servicing key markets like Philadelphia, DC and the Poconos — all areas have had record snows — and East coasters are heading for the hills — their wallets in tow.

Michael Cleren of Jack Frost reports, “We are set for record [sales] numbers in the next 10 days.” For most eastern ski resorts business is strong and the snow pack is now in place for healthy March operations and profits.

For grocery stores, these are also profitable times. The snow storms have challenged Wawa, Safeway and Giant retailers to stay open during the inclement weather. Those that can manage to keep their doors open report brisk sales with the public making a run on staples just prior to the storm.

Sal Mattera, Wawa operations chief reports other good news for some Wawa vendors:
the store pays overtime to keep their parking lots plowed and sidewalks clear. During a storm, customers are in a spending mood. If customers can make it to their parking lot, Wawa does everything possible to make sure they make it inside.

Feasting on Dead Cat

And what a dead cat bounce it has been so far.

Since March the bull market run has continued swift and steep leaving many in the dust. On Monday the Dow plowed ahead and closed up 3,954 points higher than its low in March.

For those with the guts to invest with Warren Buffet early in the year, they have seen their portfolio now up over 60%. And it appears that the markets are just getting warmed up.

Despite high unemployment, consumers seem to be in a merry mood this year. As they look to 2010, they see a jobs picture improving and an economy that seems to be back on track.

Perhaps this is just a dead cat bounce. But it is doubtful that many have seen a deceased feline bounce this high this fast…

(Click to enlarge chart)

Free Versus Unregulated Markets

You will, from time to time, see people ask for more regulation of markets. I don’t really need to cite any examples, do I? They’re all over today’s newspapers, claiming that unregulated or deregulated or free markets are responsible for the collapse of various businesses.

There is no such thing as an unregulated market, however. The term “free market” is a bit of misnomer. Participants in a free market are not free to do anything they want. If you fail to make a product that people choose to buy, that is a freedom you will find unavailable in a free market.

Let us be clear: there are markets which are regulated by politicians, and there are markets which are regulated by customers. There are no unregulated markets. There are no free markets. There are only markets in which customers are free to reward or punish businesses, and markets in which customers are prevented from rewarding or punishing businesses.

Which kind of that market do you want? One where you are free to buy or not buy? Or one where you are hampered?

John Kay makes a similar point.

2009: The Year of Sustainability?

Pundits have referred to 2007 as The Year of the Crash and 2008 as The Year of Deleveraging. Both are appropriate and with the initiation of 2009, as the aftereffects of the crash and its subsequent deleveraging continue to dominate economic reality, we look for hints as to what the next four quarters may hold.

One recurrent theme among the many New Year prognosticators is that of sustainability. While this theme is obviously appropriate in discussions of environmental concerns, its applicability to economics isn’t necessarily as immediately clear. But consider sustainability—

—in energy. T. Boone Pickens has done the United States a service by demonstrating the economic unsustainability of current energy usage patterns. While everybody certainly has the right to use (and waste) energy if they can afford to, consider the boost for the domestic economy from reduced imports of crude oil, replaced by renewable energy sources or those domestically available, such as nuclear power or natural gas. Narrowing the trade gap can only strengthen the economy at a fundamental and sustainable level.

—in consumerism. The U.S. consumer cannot support the entire planet and manufacturers in emerging economies must base their anticipated growth elsewhere while households in the States retrench and pay off loans. The current ratio of household debt to after-tax income stands at 139% and in 2007, consumer spending was fully 70% of U.S. gross domestic product, above the historical average of 66%. While four percent may not sound like much, that’s an estimated $550 billion of spending per year, much of it enabled by credit rather than income.

Central banks, including the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England, regularly survey loan officers, and the results of these surveys show that credit remains tight and may tighten further. Many households in developed economies (not only the U.S.) will therefore have no choice but to continue deleveraging before going on another spending spree, reducing debt-income ratios and levels of consumer spending to sustainable levels.

—in real estate. All markets, including housing, should be driven by demand, not by investors or builders. So-called “house flippers” who purchase residential real estate, slap on a coat of paint and plant a few shrubs, then resell within months, do little for the market beyond driving up prices. In the most heavily overbuilt and overpriced areas of the nation, such as Florida, California, Arizona, and Nevada, these short-term investors accounted for as much as 33% of the prime loans in default and 25% of the subprime ones, pushing the first round of foreclosures in those areas. (The second round is being driven by fundamental factors such as lost employment.)

Even more telling is the regional ratio between the average monthly mortgage payment and the average monthly income. In Houston, one of the most residentially affordable metropolitan areas in the nation, this ratio is 16.6; however, in Reno it’s 30.2, in Miami it’s 46.8, and in Los Angeles it’s 63.5. Such levels are not sustainable and it’s possible housing prices in these areas have further to fall.

—in financial markets, including currencies and commodities. This is too obvious to require discussion. The most egregious examples are crude oil at $150 per barrel and the yen trading at such high levels against the U.S. dollar that Toyota registers its first operating loss in 70 years and the market invites intervention by the Bank of Japan.

The overindulgences of the U.S. economy are best summarized by the single term consumer. Beloved of economists and widely utilized (mea culpa) for its simplicity and clarity, it nevertheless reduces people to a biological and need-driven level rather than a human or reasoning one; after all, bacteria are consumers, too.

Perhaps its all-too-common usage by economists and the media has convinced us that consumption is the true meaning of our financial existence. Perhaps the change most needed by the U.S. economy isn’t in political parties or governmental administrations. Perhaps it’s in our view of ourselves.