<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Citizen Economists &#187; art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/tag/art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs</link>
	<description>Citizen Economists is an online economics magazine written by citizen journalists. These ordinary citizens provide reports and commentary on the current events affecting the economics of the fields they work in.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:10:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What Can the Art Market Tell Us About Our Economy?</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/10/23/what-can-the-art-market-tell-us-about-our-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/10/23/what-can-the-art-market-tell-us-about-our-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee Jamieson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citizen Economists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collectibles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When compared to more traditional investment options, the contemporary art market is highly inefficient – but this hasn’t dampened the enthusiasm of buyers and investors.</p> <p>The contemporary art market has left its critics standing. Many presumed that it would be one of the crisis’ first victims as collectors tightened their purse strings and investors <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/10/23/what-can-the-art-market-tell-us-about-our-economy/">What Can the Art Market Tell Us About Our Economy?</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When compared to more traditional investment options, the contemporary art market is highly inefficient – but this hasn’t dampened the enthusiasm of buyers and investors.</p>
<p>The contemporary art market has left its critics standing. Many presumed that it would be one of the crisis’ first victims as collectors tightened their purse strings and investors redirected their funds to safer areas. Yet somehow, the art market has boomed beyond expectation.</p>
<p>It is ironic that, in this period of economic turbulence, this inefficient little market has become more stable than the giant financial institutions. On the same day that Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy, Sotheby’s auction house raised nearly $100 million for the work of British artist Damien Hirst.</p>
<p>Many in the media have viewed the art market’s boom with suspicion since the start of the crisis, and they have been keen to pounce every time a market correction occurs – corrections are to be expected from any fast-growing market. They have presented the market’s success as a mystery and suggested that the market has somehow become disconnected from the underlying economy.</p>
<p>But the art market is not disconnected – it cannot be. Rather, it is a perfect reflection of the current state of the global economy.</p>
<p><b>New Art Investors</b></p>
<p>A new breed of collector is stalking the auction house: many corporate investors have increased their exposure to fine art in an attempt to diversify away from the financial markets. You would be forgiven for presuming that art is a high risk investment considering the subjective nature of art appreciation, yet corporate investors have brought with them more reliable valuation methods to an industry reliant on historical post-auction data. </p>
<p>A whole industry has sprung up around the needs of these corporate investors: there are now a number of fine art funds that trade artwork as you would any other commodity and indexes with which to more accurately anticipate future trends. Earlier this year, intelligence provider Artprice.com launched its Art Market Confidence Index, aimed at providing serious investors with more reliable metrics for the art market. </p>
<p>Many buyers are using art purely as a tool for financial gain which, in turn, has pushed up the price of the market. It is sad that the growth of the market has made it difficult for legitimate museums and public galleries to purchase new stock; a larger proportion of our international art heritage is finding its way into private collections. Of course, private collections are nothing new, but is the financial motivation behind the purchase (and therefore the price) changing the way we look at art? Should we be worried when art becomes nothing more than a commodity?</p>
<p><b>New Art Collectors</b></p>
<p>Salvation comes from an unlikely source. The image of the elitist western collector is slowly being eclipsed by the cash-rich Russian oligarch – reportedly, a third of the buyers at the Damien Hirst auction mentioned above were from the ex-Soviet Union.</p>
<p>These new Russian buyers have injected the art market with liquidity. Although the investment potential of art may influence their purchases, their primary interest is aesthetic – they are in search of unique and sophisticated items to complement their luxurious lifestyles and new-found wealth.</p>
<p>The art market has boomed because it has attracted these new breeds of investor and buyer. In this respect, the art market has not disconnected itself from the realities of the global economy – rather, it reflects the global shift in economic power: western capital is moving away from financial institutions into other areas, oil and gas-rich <a href="http://www.amateureconomists.com/view_articles_detail.php?aid=87">BRIC countries</a> have a major economic advantage and investments from cash-rich countries are cushioning the downturn in certain sectors.</p>
<p>Perhaps the ultimate lesson to be learned about our economic system is that, given time, all bubbles burst. Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/10/23/what-can-the-art-market-tell-us-about-our-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Economy&#8217;s Affect on Artists: A Bifurcated Reality</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/08/29/the-economys-affect-on-artists-a-bifurcated-reality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/08/29/the-economys-affect-on-artists-a-bifurcated-reality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B.P.T.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discretionary spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=1111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When the economy is in a slump, for the vast majority of the population, discretionary income is often cut, leaving people to spend for necessities rather than luxuries. Save an elite few, art is generally considered a luxury or perhaps an investment rather than a daily need. But for those who make their living <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/08/29/the-economys-affect-on-artists-a-bifurcated-reality/">The Economy&#8217;s Affect on Artists: A Bifurcated Reality</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the economy is in a slump, for the vast majority of the population, discretionary income is often cut, leaving people to spend for necessities rather than luxuries.  Save an elite few, art is generally considered a luxury or perhaps an investment rather than a daily need. But for those who make their living creating and selling art, a shaky economic environment can have a surprising range of effects. Further, artists, including visual and musical artists, are exploring and expanding new venues to sell their creations, bypassing the traditional routes along the way.</p>
<p>What is perhaps ironic is that higher end artists and galleries have less trouble selling in today’s limping economy than those who attempt to sell at lower prices. There is a high end niche market that is relatively unaffected by varying market conditions. A recent article in the <i>Boston Globe</i> quotes Barbara Krakow, a long time high end gallery owner, who discusses the fact that some galleries are seemingly unaffected by outside economic forces.  She tells the <i>Globe</i>, “There’s a pocket in the art world not affected by what’s going on economically at all.” She should know &#8211; her clients buy her artists’ work at prices that reach upwards of $150,000.  </p>
<p><b>Discretionary Spending: Alive and Well?</b></p>
<p>The <i>Art Newspaper</i> has focused on information along the same vein. A recent article by Brooke S. Mason reports on art market shifts and quotes gallery owner David Maupin as saying, “I have far more people I can call for a $75,000 to $100,000 work than the lower-priced artists.” He also says the category of younger (and less-expensively priced) artists’ sales has dropped by half in the past few months. The art journal <i>Big, Red, and Shiny</i> published a recent interview with gallery owner Joseph Carroll in which he discusses the current economy and its effects. He points to the recent Francis Bacon triptych, which sold at Sotheby’s for an astounding $86 million. Carroll sums the situation up nicely saying, “I don’t think the art market is independent of the larger economy but they don’t appear to be synchronized at the moment. At a certain level, like the recent auctions show, the market is independent of the general economy. At the lower end, I would say they are more closely linked.”</p>
<p>But what about those younger, emerging artists? This younger generation of artists and dealers has found alternatives to sell their creations besides the traditional, sometimes stuffy, brick-and-mortar galleries. Between increasing commercial rents in traditionally established art markets like Boston, Santa Fe and New York and increasing rents for residential areas, these regions are getting tougher for up-and-coming artists to thrive.  </p>
<p>Many artists and gallery owners have turned to alternative routes to sell their work. Art fairs have become quite popular, and the art fair &#8220;circuit&#8221; extends around the country. While the travel and setup can become expensive, the overhead can be considerably less than a traditional gallery. And artists often don’t have to travel far afield to attend multiple art fairs. Some cities hold several fairs per year, or even per month, and fairs have become popular worldwide. A number of websites are dedicated to maintaining art fair listings both large and small, including <a href="http://www.artfairsinternational.com" target="_blank">www.artfairsinternational.com</a>,   <a href="http://www.festivalnet.com" target="_blank">www.festivalnet.com</a> and <a href="http://www.artfairsourcebook.com" target="_blank">www.artfairsourcebook.com</a>. These are not local hack events either. These events are generally juried, well-publicized affairs attended by large numbers of people.  </p>
<p><b>Online Galleries</b></p>
<p>In addition to art fairs, the biggest change to hit the art scene over the past decade or two is the proliferation of art sales on the Internet. Gallery owners and artists alike can show their art to buyers around the world with very little overhead costs and can easily ship worldwide. Whether selling through online auctions or sales websites, art can be shown and purchased at the click of a mouse, and the World Wide Web has changed the art sales landscape, much the same way the MySpace phenomenon has changed the indie music business. Even that mammoth of art dealers, Sotheby’s, offers previews of art online so potential buyers can get a good look at the art before attending a live auction.  </p>
<p>One other perhaps less well-known option for struggling artists is to attend an MFA program at a university. Because most public and private donations for artists go to institutions and not individual artists, a Master of Fine Arts program can be a place artists can study, create and build a reputation. Of course, like anyone who chooses additional higher education, there is always the issue of cost to live and attend school, but scholarships and other grants can help pave the way, and the long term benefits hopefully outweigh current costs.</p>
<p>The art world is perhaps one of the most intriguing pockets of an economy not affected by outside forces. While high end collectors and investors (and the artists they patronize) are seemingly unaffected by the more pedestrian issues of high gas prices and rising food costs, emerging artists and the galleries that support them around the country are getting crunched by increasing rents and fewer buyers in their category. Whether this bifurcation of the art world persists as the economy continues to struggle remains to be seen, but for art enthusiasts, it will certainly be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/08/29/the-economys-affect-on-artists-a-bifurcated-reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

