Paging Dr. Sowell

By Simon Grey, on December 15th, 2011

Researchers with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that investors who used low-down-payment, subprime credit to purchase multiple residential properties helped inflate home prices and are largely to blame for the recession. The researchers said their findings focused on an “undocumented” dimension of the housing market crisis that had been previously overlooked as officials focused on how to contain the financial crisis, not what caused it.

More than a third of all U.S. home mortgages granted in 2006 went to people who already owned at least one house, according to the report. In Arizona, California, Florida and Nevada, where average home prices more than doubled from 2000 to 2006, investors made up nearly half of all mortgage-backed purchases during the housing bubble. Buyers owning three or more properties represented the fastest-growing segment of homeowners during that time.

“This may have allowed the bubble to inflate further, which caused millions of owner-occupants to pay more if they wanted to buy a home for their family,” the researchers noted.

Investors defaulted in large numbers after home values began to drop in 2006. They accounted for more than 25 percent of seriously delinquent mortgage balances nationwide, and more than a third in Arizona, California, Florida, and Nevada from 2007 to 2009.

Sweet Keynes but the banksters just do not have a clue. Somehow, the FRB of New York has come to the hilarious conclusion that somehow, mysteriously, those who “flip” houses are the root cause of the recession. Talk about clueless.

The question that the NY FRB is apparently too stupid to ask is: Why would some people suddenly decide to “flip” houses? Answer: because it’s generally profitable due to the increased demand for houses as a result of a)artificially low interest rates from The Fed, b) massive fraud among the banks in regards to loan application, c) the Federal Government’s willingness to subsidize market risk, and thus eliminate moral hazard, through the agencies Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, and d) the general tendency of the government to encourage and subsidize home ownership through, among other things, federal income tax breaks. Basically, the government as at the root of most of the problem here, and the Federal Reserve played a major role.

Of course, the FRB is not going to admit to wrongdoing, particularly since greedy businessmen make for a more compelling villain in this narrative. But blaming people for responding to incentives at the margin, as clearly happened in this case, is indicative of just how worthless mainstream macroeconomic analysis clearly is. Quite simply, it takes an astonishing amount of either dishonesty or short-sightedness to come to the conclusion that greedy businessmen are to blame for the current recession instead of the incentive system in which they operated.

The shallowness of this analysis, if honest, is simply evidence that those who are currently in charge are simply too stupid to merit the power with which they’ve been entrusted. If, on the other hand, they are liars, the case for their removal from power is not in any way diminished. In sum, there is no excuse for those presumed to be intelligent, and thus deserving of power, to be offering analysis this putridly vapid; they must be summarily dismissed and the system must be dispatched with.

* Cf. Dr. Sowell’s book Applied Economics.



2 comments   Economic Theory   , , , , , ,  

Balancing Small Silver with Big Payoffs: David Morgan

By The Gold Report, on December 15th, 2011

David Morgan David Morgan, publisher of Silver Investor, likes the balanced risk and growth that midtier companies provide, but even he can’t resist the pull of having a speculative pick pay off. In this exclusive interview with The Gold Report, Morgan talks about the tenets he lives by when investing in mining companies, be they small-cap or midtier or billion dollar companies.

The Gold Report: David, in August you predicted that the silver price could go as high as $75 an ounce (oz). It was recently at about $32/oz. Where is it along the path to $75/oz?
David Morgan: I don’t see the silver price going above the $50/oz level in 2011. In other words, the top is in for this year, and has been for some time. I do see silver’s price going above $50/oz in 2012. I forecast $65–75/oz silver by the end of 2012. I don’t foresee a big rush into price appreciation for gold or silver in the first quarter of 2012 (Q112), which is seasonal. Typically, there is a very strong boost to the price of metals in the first quarter of every year. However, this year I’m suspect because of what’s going on in the Eurozone and all the paper pushing between the central banks of the world. I’m reserved about what’s going to happen over the next three months.

TGR: What did you think of the recent move by central banks in the U.K. and Canada getting together to boost liquidity in the markets? It seemed to push up the gold price a bit.

DM: It was what I call “old school.” I’m showing my age, but we used to avidly watch the U.S. money supply. When there was a significant increase in the money supply, the gold price would reflect that because it is more dollars chasing a fixed amount of goods. It’s a clear indicator that papering over the problem is not a solution and gold is shouting that loudly. The increase in M1, M2 or M3 (not provided by the Fed anymore) is looked at, but not with the intensity it was in the 1970s.

TGR: In the November issue of Silver Investor, you report that China could become a significant holder of European debt. While any such move would devalue China’s significant holdings of U.S. Treasuries, it would provide leverage for China’s efforts to form a new global currency backed in part by gold. Could you expand upon that idea?

DM: China as a nation has become the creditor of last resort because it has money to recycle. The more debt that it owns, the more control it has over the debt. China would have a lot of leverage in any default negotiations. There was a conference about a gold-backed yuan about a decade ago. The idea about a gold-backed currency is probably going to take place at some point in the future. China has bought more gold all along than they publicly admit, but the amount is far too small at this point to do any real gold backing to their currency. The country continues to buy gold slowly and quietly. It’s hard to say when China would have enough to make a viable gold-backed currency out of the yuan. That’s where the negotiations would come into play.

TGR: Do you think it would take decades?

DM: It would take decades to accumulate enough to make a gold-backed yuan in the fashion China is acquiring gold now. However, if China dumped a significant amount of its money (U.S. debt) into gold at once it would drive up the price thousands of dollars an ounce overnight. Gold would go ballistic. On the other hand, China has the leverage of the debt. In other words, it says, “U.S., you owe us this much money, so what we’ll do is we’ll discount the debt. You send us this much gold and we’ll cancel out part of the U.S. debt we hold.” That is a lot of power. Remember, “The borrower is servant to the lender.”

TGR: You recently reprinted Ron Hera’s “23 Ways to Boost Silver Investment Profits.” It talks about risk versus growth.

DM: The best place to be in this market, after establishing a physical metals position, is on the mining side by balancing risk with growth. I like the midtiers because this is where the greatest growth is along with mitigated risk.

TGR: Hera also tells investors to take a 24- to 36-month time horizon.

DM: All markets move up and down, including the silver market. Investors have to take the long-term view of this market. There is still a major trend to the upside, but there’s going to be more volatility.

TGR: Hera tells investors to be greedy when others are fearful and be fearful when others are greedy.

DM: I was getting fearful while others were getting greedy when silver was around the $35/oz level on its way to $50/oz. I cautioned investors that if they had to buy silver at that level to only buy some because the market was temporarily overdone. I was getting a lot of blowback from even some of the better analysts for being too cautious. I called the top around $48/oz and I’m pleased with that call. In other words, looking from the perspective of this interview my call was a good one, yet you would not believe the flack I took from some in this business.

TGR: Hera also says, “No excuses.” If a company isn’t progressing, just get out.

DM: You have to hold every company’s feet to the fire. Ask what it plans to do next year and if it met its milestones last year. The idea is to strive to do everything it set out to, but if it can’t then it should report it honestly and move on.

I don’t really like the junior sector that much. There are a lot of companies that have gone by the wayside early in the junior mining cycle. There are still some good values out there, but it’s pretty tough to call these days.

TGR: He also advises that investors pay attention to value and don’t pay a premium to get on the bandwagon.

DM: I agree. For example, we did an update on Royal Gold Inc. (RGL:TSX; RGLD:NASDAQ) sometime ago that showed how valuable it was—even at an extended stock price. A well-known Wall Street stockbroker took the time to call me to say it was an over-the-top, great report. That stock has done extremely well while so many have not.

TGR: Hera also discussed the influence of inflation on real wealth. Given the hidden inflation in the market, he argues that to preserve or even grow wealth, investors have no choice but to seek higher gains of a minimum of 25% a year. What’s your perspective on it?

DM: Markets are volatile. They wax and they wane. The market is in a period of consolidation. Very few stocks are reflecting their true value. It’s a good time to gradually get into these stocks. They could go lower over the next few months, but they represent one of the best places to put money right now.

As far as what to expect in the future, let me just state that I agree with ShadowStats.com Editor John Williams’ prediction that we have 10% inflation. There will always be some dogs (stocks) that won’t move, but there should be some real gains in precious metals. If there’s truly 10% inflation, there could be 25% gains in a mining equity, which would be a 15% real gain versus the true inflation rate. Once the sector gets hot again, the gains could be huge.

Presently, stocks are undervalued, which means be greedy when everyone’s fearful. This is the time investors should be buying.

TGR: Some pundits are saying that the market’s going to go even lower before it heads higher. Do you believe that’s the case?

DM: I do, but to think that you can pick an exact bottom is an amateur’s game. A professional tries to get in and accumulate while the getting is good. I’m looking at December through perhaps as late as April.

TGR: If investors are trying to reach 25% returns per year, they’ve got to turn to the small-cap space.

DM: Not necessarily. First, to expect those returns every year is unreasonable. However, investors could make 17% a year just by holding a good company, like Royal Gold, and writing the options on it. The options writers win 85% of the time and the option buyers lose 85% of the time. An investor could rent a stock like that out to people that want to play the options game and smile all the way to the bank—even in a downtrending market.

TGR: Nonetheless, you have some speculative buys on a handful of small-cap silver plays.

DM: Of course. Nothing is more exciting than getting a speculation right. We had Western Copper before it was renamed Western Silver, and eventually bought out by Glamis. Glamis was eventually bought out by Goldcorp Inc. (G:TSX; GG:NYSE). When you get a 4,000% gain on something, you can’t help but smile.

We like some small caps. Silvermex Resources Inc. (SLX:TSX; GGCRF:OTC) is one that we’ve come back to. The stock did fairly well after our initial recommendation. Then we went into this financial situation that clobbered everything and Silvermex had to regroup. We sold it. We came back to it when it was very undervalued. I’ve done that on several companies.

TGR: Silvermex is down about 26% year-over-year right now. Is that just the market or is that fallout from the deal with Genco Resources Ltd.?

DM: It’s both. The Genco deal looks pretty good on paper, but the market is giving a different vote right now.

Sometimes persistence pays off in stocks, however. I’ll give you an example. We owned First Majestic Silver Corp. (FR:TSX; AG:NYSE; FMV:Fkft) for a very long time. We had it at $4/share, but it was under $4/share month after month. When that stock finally caught on it went like gangbusters. We could have missed a huge move in that stock if we weren’t persistent. Am I always right? No. Am I right on Silvermex? I don’t know yet. Does it look bad at this particular point in time? Yes, it probably does. But I know enough to know that there’s a strong probability that at some point the stock will catch up.

TGR: What’s your view of Silvermex’s management?

DM: It’s one of the better management teams out there. I know Mike Callahan, Silvermex’s president who was formerly an executive with Hecla Mining Co. (HL:NYSE). I also know Art Brown, who was also with Hecla. Silvermex has a strong board. They want to make this company viable. They have something to prove.

TGR: It’s trading at about $0.40/share right now. Is that a good entry point?

DM: We had it earlier than that, but it’s probably OK. Investors could slowly build positions between now and April to take advantage of any further market decrease.

TGR: You’ve done pretty well with some of the midtiers, too.

DM: Pretium Resources Inc. (PVG:TSX) stock is up 20% after it announced a much larger, higher-grade asset. We were into the stock at around CA$8/share. It’s well above CA$10/share, but it’s still undervalued. We love the management. Robert Quartermain has a proven track record. Investors see a stock move and they’re scared to buy it. That’s incorrect thinking. A lot of these stocks that make big moves make new high after new high. How else does a stock go from $5/share to $50/share?

TGR: Pretium is up about 45% so far in 2011. How much upside is left?

DM: I think there’s plenty left. Think about buying $1,000 worth of Coca-Cola stock in 1928. People worry about how much is left, but what if the stock goes up 500% or 5000%? You have to let the stock tell investors how much upside is potentially left. You don’t want to sell your winners. You want to sell your losers.

TGR: What other midtiers still have some upside?

DM: Tahoe Resources Inc. (THO:TSX) is a great company on my watch list with a lot of upside. It’s not very well known.

TGR: BMO Nesbitt Burns has a $26/share price target on Tahoe. It’s trading around $18/share now. Do you think that’s reasonable?

DM: I do, but I don’t like to use price targets because it’s a no-win situation. If it makes a target and it stops at that exact price, you’re a genius. If it’s under that or over that then you get nothing but flack. Do I think Tahoe is undervalued? Yes.

TGR: Tahoe is planning to produce about 316.9 million ounces of silver from its Escobal property in Guatemala over the next 18 years. Do you have any doubts that it will execute on that?

DM: There are always doubts in the mining industry. There’s jurisdictional risk in many South American countries. Am I confident that it’ll happen? No, not today. Investors should spread out geopolitically. It’s very important in today’s financial climate to expect the unexpected.

TGR: The company is run by Kevin McArthur, who was the president and chief executive of Glamis Gold, which was taken over by Goldcorp, and then headed Goldcorp. It’s hard to argue with that kind of track record.

DM: I’m not. You have to put a great deal of credence into that caliber of management. But the best management in the world in the wrong jurisdiction can have problems. Robert Quartermain is one of my favorite examples. He was involved in a project in Russia and got burned slightly.

TGR: Are there any other company stories you’d like to share with us?

DM: Prophecy Coal Corp. (PCY:TSX; PRPCF:OTCQX; 1P2:Fkft) is undervalued. Prophecy Coal was two companies. It’s a coal company, but it also had a platinum group metals company that was spun off. I still like the Prophecy Coal side.

It’s a long-term project with a lot of hurdles to overcome in the uncertain jurisdiction of Mongolia. However, I have been to Mongolia and met with some of the people heading up the project, which will be using the coal deposit to fuel a power plant. I got a pretty good feel for how serious they are. As a speculation, it’s one of the better ones.

TGR: Do you follow 49 North Resources Inc. (FNR:TSX.V) at all?

DM: Yes, it is on my watch list.

TGR: It’s a different kind of play. It’s a little like the Pinetree Capital model where it takes positions in companies involved in many different resources.

DM: What I like about that type of model is that it spreads risk out. These are run by professionals that know what they’re doing. That model is especially good for the retail investors who don’t have the time to understand what they’re buying. It’s a good way to play the market.

TGR: In a response to a readers’ inquiry about the frightening possibility of deflation, you replied, “I do see a deflationary scare and suggest you buy all the way through it—three to six months. These mining stocks are cheap, but could get cheaper. I do not see it as being as bad as 2008.” How bad do you see it getting?

DM: The mining equities market could drop another 10%. But it’s possible that the current market is as bad as it gets. I do not see the financial crisis of 2008 repeating in 2012. But something needs to be done that’s going to really strengthen the financial markets and confidence in the system on a global basis. If that isn’t done, I expect 2008 or worse to repeat at some point. But, again, I don’t think that will happen for a couple of years.

TGR: Thanks for taking the time to share with us.

David Morgan (Silver-Investor.com) is a widely recognized analyst in the precious metals industry and consults for hedge funds, high-net-worth investors, mining companies, depositories and bullion dealers. He is the publisher of The Morgan Report on precious metals, author of Get the Skinny on Silver Investing (Morgan James Publishing, 2009) and featured speaker at investment conferences in North America, Europe and Asia.



Leave a comment   Financial Markets   , , , , ,  

Risk of depletion: the vacation from pension angst is over before it began

By Christopher Briem, on December 15th, 2011

Yunz thought I forgot.  That or lost interest?  Boiler has been building up steam is all.  That and there seems to be quite a confluence of news in the nexus here: pensions, assessments, redistricting even migration. Damage Control teams being spread thin just trying to keep up. But let’s poke in on pensions for a minute.

Let’s recap:  we all declared victory just a few months ago it seemed.  We ’solved this for the city’ was one quote.


So last week we learn that the city pension funding is down to 54%,  Note that is 54% with the notional asset of pledged future parking revenues that is still hard to define and as council is learning even harder yet to extract from the Pittsburgh Parking Authority.  Let’s just agree that it is not cash on hand in any form, nor fungible in any extant market.  I still want to know what the real cash horizon is for the pension fund.  You think others would care as well.


What really ups my distemper over the whole notional asset is how if confused the public.  Maybe the asset makes sense, maybe it doesn’t.  But read the news coverage and tell me if you walk away with any appreciation for how much in $$ is really there to pay pension bills? No real appreciation that a large part (soon to be the majority) of all pension assets are no more than a promise from the city to itself to pay money in the future to the pension account.  It is a promise that I am pretty sure existed long before last December mind you.


So it is conincidence that Governning had a column last week on the public pension problems everywhere to a degree. Will pension plans run out of money? It talks of the “risk of depletion” for pension funds.  “depletion” isn’t quite a euphemism, but sure sounds a lot tamer than the what it would mean if it were to come true.


So what does it all mean here?   Here is what we know as to the state of the city’s collective pension fund. Forgive me for any errors in the decimal points, the city does not mail me the detailed pension accounting.

Total liability Jan 1, 2011 $1,012,027,241
Funding as of Jan 1, 2011 said to be 62% which gives me   $627 mil
Funding as of Sept 30, 2011 said to be 54%  so $549 mil
Value of notional asset said to be valued at $239 million which gives a net value of $307 mil
That in itself would give you 30% funding ratio.  It has been worse.    Still,, after all the extra $$ piled in and all the other machinations, in reality we are in my calculation below the 32% we were just about two years ago. No thanks to some big losses due to massive market timing bets.  I really wonder if they have really gotten all the cash back into the market in a portfolio that make sense.  Something tugging at me makes me wonder what is up with the investment. Anyone know more?
If this is how we define success, you have to wonder what failure looks like?  The only thing different today than a year ago is that an IOU was passed from one part of city government to another.  The truth is that IOU existed legally, morally, and in the accounting long before the latest accounting trick.  So what really is any different?
It really is worse than that. Realize also that there was what by definition was a one time transfer of the cash that was sitting in the not so locked ‘lock box’ built up from past budget surpluses. So just before the end of the year.. or so everyone is agreeing to even if the banks were closed, was the transfer of $45 million I believe it was to the pension fund. When thinking about trends, you really have to think about that as the one-time opportunity it was. No such surplus will be there for a long time again.  If you were to net that out the city would most likely have been at ~$262 mil or less, or just under 26% funding ratio.
I won’t pile on and say another year has gone by and while the rate of increase in the calculated total liability has slowed a bit, it would still seem an obvious projection that the total liability is higher as well which would push that % lower. That or that parts of the system are less well funded than these cumulative averages would imply.  But success.. keep saying it.. it all succeeded last year.


Leave a comment   U.S. Economics   , , ,