Gold And Silver Continue Consolidating Before The Next Upleg

The balance sheets of banks have derivative singularities sucking in any equity that passes near the event horizon.

The world is in commotion but the precious metals markets are in forward motion like never before. Both the Eurocrat’s totalitarian dream and Euro are evaporating while the Damocles sword of credit default swaps hang over the countries’ heads.

The next round of The Great Credit Contraction has started in Europe with Greece in the target sight. While the world scrambles for liquidity capital is burrowing into and oscillating between FRN$ and gold. This consolidation in the gold price and silver price is laying the foundation for the next major up leg.

200 DAY MOVING AVERAGES ARE RISING

The 200 DMA acts like gravity on the price of assets allowing for the relative comparison over time which helps to filter out the daily trading noise. The recent melt-up in the gold price since July has added nearly FRN$300 or  €300 that needs to be digested into the 200 day moving average. Keep in mind that 200 days ago was the beginning of March and the gold price was a mere $1,420 per ounce. The 200 day moving average for gold is now at FRN$1,511.69 and increasing at approximately FRN$1.85 per day.

The silver price is also consolidating its recent gains. With a current silver price around FRN$40 and a 200 day moving average around FRN$35.76 and adding about four cents per day. So, two more months of consolidation and then the next move up.

Gold is currently consolidating its price 10% faster than silver and is confirmed with the relative price at 1.1133 for silver as compared to gold’s relative price of 1.1771. Of all the precious metals gold appears to be the most expensive. The real value seems to be in palladium which is trading at an extreme discount of 0.9224x its 200 day moving average.

Gold has likely seen a great increase in monetary demand from Europeans who do not want exposure to counter-party risk from bankrupt and insolvent. The banking crisis is far from over and for holders of capital that is at risk it must be extremely scary. Sitting in allocated gold or other precious metals held in segregated, audited, secure and insured storage, like with GoldMoney, would be a much more comforting position than in Societe Generala, UBS, Unicredit, etc. As Bloomberg reported on 19 Sep 2011, “A gauge of banks’ reluctance to lend to each other in Europe rose for the first time in a week amid renewed concern Greece is headed for a default.”

This is likely one of the reasons platinum and palladium are priced so cheaply. Monetary demand has flowed into gold and somewhat into silver. Forecasted industrial demand is anemic. Less cars and other goods will be demanded and produced. So the price of inputs, like platinum and palladium, fall. Or so the argument goes.

The specter of price inflation should begin an increasingly aggressive haunting of savers and holders of capital.

PLATINUM AND PALLADIUM ARE CHEAP

Platinum and palladium are a great deal right now. Like gold and silver they can never become worthless and, if held correctly, are not subject to counter-party risk. The supply is much smaller and if there is a significant increase in demand, perhaps from investors looking to preserve capital, then their price can increase significantly. Additionally, although platinum is significantly more rare than gold it is, unusually, cheaper in FRN$ terms and palladium is currently an even better deal!

The platinum to gold 200 day moving is currently 1.19 compared to the current price of 1.00. The price of platinum in terms of gold has not been this cheap since shortly after the first round of the credit crisis when Lehman Brothers collapsed.

Palladium is a little more difficult to discern through the golden lens. Like platinum it has not been cheaper since the Lehman collapse. Currently its 200 day moving average is 0.51 compared to the current palladium price in gold of 0.40. This makes palladium slightly cheaper than platinum with the current price in gold about 78% its 200 day moving average compared to platinum’s 84%. Palladium also has a significantly cheaper relative price in FRN$.

THE SPECTRE OF PRICE INFLATION

Central banks the world over have followed the Federal Reserve and created tremendous amounts of liquidity in an attempt to stave off the first round of The Great Credit Contraction. Round two is beginning to materialize and they are continuing.

In an 18 Sep 2011 NYT editorial Paul Volcker sent a warning shot to Ben Bernanke about inflation and how once inflation becomes anticipated and ingrained its stimulating effects are lost. Consider that over the past three months the Federal Reserve has increased M1 by 36.7% and M2 by 23.3%. The specter of price inflation should begin an increasingly aggressive haunting of savers and holders of capital. One place they can seek refuge is gold and silver. Another place to go is platinum, palladium or oil.

CONCLUSION

The Great Credit Contraction is destroying wealth, both real and illusory, at a tremendous rate. The balance sheets of banks have derivative singularities sucking in any equity that passes near the event horizon. This should be the real driver for precious metal demand like gold, silver, platinum and palladium; the lack of counter-party risk.

To make matters worse the stewards of fiat currencies have infected the printing presses with their incontinence. When it comes to safeguarding price stability of fiat currencies those like Ben Bernanke who have succeeded bulldogs like Paul Volcker are lesser men of greater sires.

DISCLOSURES: Long physical gold, silver and platinum with no interest in DOW, S&P 500, the problematic SLV ETF, gold ETF or the platinum ETFs.

When Actuaries Failed

Things that confuse me.

Well, there you have it. The go away and come back later answer on the City of Pittsburgh’s pension ‘solution’ of the day. (Trib, PG).  As a commenter here pointed out in the immediately previous post, the first payment from parking revenue into the pension fund is due a week from this Friday.  Does the city even have that much free cash to ship over?

On to other things I guess. More confusing things:  Increasing property tax to send $3.25 million a year over to the Carnegie Library necessitates a city-wide referendum, but sending $14-$26 million (‘irrevocably’ no less) a year to the pension fund is a simple vote of council in December?

How would the new incremental library tax be impacted by new property assessments? Does it get adjusted for anti-windfall legislation, or will it remain an extra 0.25 mills and thus likely wind up being a lot larger revenue stream? I am pretty sure the nominal tax base for the city in aggregate is going up, especially in nominal terms.
If the city decides to alter the millage for the library tax, then does the Carnegie Library have some means to sue the city to get it back. In other words, is it irrevocable in the sense of the parking tax diversion (see first point above).
So now that PPG is being sold according to news accounts… is the City of Pittsburgh again going to be left out in the cold on the potential transfer tax that would bring in. Is anyone working on the issue we brought up in the spring? A rhetorical question I know.
The notional price is only listed as a $214 million investment. So if there is a potential 3% transfer tax (total for city and school district not including additional to state) out there, the ‘lost’ revenue is on the order of $6.5 million.. or nearly 2 years of the new library tax revenues.
And from last week… If you missed the big public finance news out of Jefferson County where they also seem to have conflated all fiscal issues into their water and sewer system. Looks like JP Morgan is willing to take a big haircut and restructure bonds they set up with their county sewer system. Seems like the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer System could have used some similar consideration for their variable rate bonds causing such expense and consternation.  Maybe we didn’t ask nice enough?  or maybe we asked too nicely?  Who knows?
But I confuse easily.   and yeah, I changed the title.   The allusion just kind of punched me in the nose.
Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

Interesting readings

A nice story about UIDAI, by Lydia Polgreen, in the New York Times.

A new insight into India’s north-east states: they are part of a region provisionally named Zomia. An interesting article in the Chronicle of Higher Education by Ruth Hammond. The book.

On 21 April 1956, Jawaharlal Nehru did the first convocation address at IIT, Kharagpur. It’s a good read, and it’s surprising how much of it makes sense in 2011. E.g.: in the larger context of history, and looking at it in this way it seems to me that at the present moment there is no more exciting place to live in than India. Mind you, I use the word exciting. I did not use the word comfortable or any other soothing word, because India is going to be a hard place to live in. Let there be no mistake about it; there is no room for soft living in India, not much room for leisure, although leisure, occasional leisure is good. But there is any amount of room in India for living the hard, exciting, creative adventure of life. In case you have not yet seen the Steve Jobs commencement speech, it is worth watching.

How civilised: Literature festivals in India, by Abhilasha Ojha in Mint.

A fascinating story from rural India about the differences between boys and girls on mathematics, by Maia Szalavitz in Time magazine.

Who’s to blame for India’s inflation and India’s Inflation Is a Lesson for Fast-Growing Economies by Alex Frangos in the Wall Street Journal.

When do stock futures dominate price discovery? by Nidhi Aggarwal and Susan Thomas, IGIDR working paper, has some surprising results.

Anupama Chandrasekaran and Vidya Padmanabhan, in Mint, on Indian ventures into farming in Ethiopia.

Raghu Dayal in the Business Standard on the huge opportunities in better India-Bangladesh relations.

Mobis Philipose in Mint, on recent developments in SEBI and on currency derivatives trading.

We need a Hazare in the financial sector by Tamal Bandyopadhyay in Mint. N. Sundaresha Subramanian in the Business Standard. Ex-SEBI member to PM: ID leaked, family at grave risk by P. Vaidyanathan Iyer in the Indian Express. CVC to Fin Min: Probe both sides’ complaints by Ritu Sarin in the Financial Express. And, reportage in India Today. Spat between Abraham, SEBI, finance ministry gets murkier by Appu Esthose Suresh in Mint. Supreme Court wants petition on SEBI refiled by Nikhil Kanekal and Appu Esthose Suresh in Mint. A first and then a second article on these issues, by R. Jagannathan, on FirstPost. An editorial in the Business Standard. Subhomoy Bhattacharjee in the Financial Express.

R. Jagannathan on post offices as banks (on firstpost). And, you might like this related document.

China’s A. Q. Khan problem: an article by Michael Wines in the New York Times.

A great story by Anthony Shadid in the New York Times about being on the run in Syria.

A great article by Paul Berman, in the New Republic, about Islamism.

Why is it so hard to find a suicide bomber these days by Charles Kurzman, in Foreign Policy.

Love and war, by Janine di Giovanni, in the New York Times.

What’s next for the dollar? by Martin Feldstein.

Sussane Craig has a great profile, in the New York Times, of how Howard W. Lutnick brought Cantor Fitzgerald back to life after the
firm was savaged in the 9/11 attacks.

Economic Events on September 20, 2011

At 7:45 AM EDT, the weekly ICSC-Goldman Store Sales report will be released, giving an update on the health of the consumer through this analysis of retail sales.

At 8:30 AM EDT, the Housing Starts report for August will be released.  The consensus is that construction on 592,000 new homes were started last month, which would be a decrease of 12,000 from the previous month.

At 8:55 AM EDT, the weekly Redbook report will be released, giving us more information about consumer spending.