(Trying) to buy gold in Chile

A lot of stuff SovereignMan writes is good, but this latest piece on buying gold in Chile is a spin job. Simon Black says that Chile is “where the government just leaves you alone”, with “a fairly well-developed gold market”. See if that is justified with these key points from the article:

“major banks or the Central Bank, with the great disadvantage of having to pay value added tax” – most countries do not charge VAT on investment bullion

money exchange houses … the way they sell is informal, which means that they are not required to charge the value added tax … premiums on gold coins in these shops from as little as 1% over spot” – doesn’t say what quality coins you get for 1% and I question whether the 1% really is 1% once the buy/sell spread on the spot is taken into consideration (money changers aren’t known for tight spreads)

“some private bullion coin dealers which deal in foreign issuances like the Canadian Maple leaf coin for around 3% to 6% over spot. These dealers do not necessarily have a place of business with fixed office hours – they’re private traders who will often meet at your home or office” – sounds a bit dodgy and I’d certainly not be interested in having a dealer know where I live or work

“storage, the best of option in Chile is at the banks. This can be difficult for foreigners as it is typically required to have some sort of residency visa to have a safety deposit box or checking account” – bank safety deposit boxes are no good in a bank holiday

“no private secure storage facilities in Chile other than the secure vaults around the country’s many casinos” – that isn’t a sign of a well developed market

“possible to bring in larger quantities of gold, tax-free, but there is a slightly more complicated process. One must first convert all gold holdings to coins issued by a country with which Chile has a free trade agreement … a lawyer must obtain a ruling letter that the coins were made in that country (Canada, in this example) and are thus not subject to import duties” – what a silly requirement and process

That doesn’t sound like a country that wants people to own gold.

Economic Events on June 3, 2011

The Monster Employment Index for May was released today, and the index moved down 2 points to a value of 143, which is 7% higher than last May’s value.

At 8:30 AM EDT, the Employment Situation report for May will be announced, and the consensus for non-farm payrolls is an increase of 170,000 jobs compared to a gain of 244,000 in the previous month, the consensus for private payrolls is an increase of 180,000 jobs compared to a gain of 268,000 in the previous month, the consensus for the unemployment rate is that it will decrease  0.1 % to 8.9%, the consensus average hourly earnings rate is expected to increase 0.2%, and the consensus for the average workweek is 34.3 hours.

At 10:00 AM EDT, the ISM non-manufacturing index for May will be released.  The consensus estimate is that increased by 1.2 points to a value of 54.0, and will continue to signal economic growth as it remains above the mid-point of 50.

I'm shocked, shocked to find that housing appreciation is going on here!

First off, I’m shocked that nobody could find any way to spin some recent real estate news as a downer.  Given the national news of continued real estate price declines most everywhere*, some of the recent local data showing continuing price appreciation was reported as being a good thing.  None of the discounting that most all similar stories of late have generally focused on such things as the generally lower trend in the number of transactions which may not be good for real estate agents, but may or may not be a bad thing for the regional economy as a whole.

But just how much of a story is it that real estate prices are going up? Here is something I compiled quickly.  The OFHEO’s Housing Price Index is one general measure of real estate price trends that is reported for MSA’s, States and the US.  I created two time series for the year-over-year housing price appreciation in Pittsburgh and for the US.  The footnote is this is the seasonally-adjusted purchase-only data for those who want to check me. Then I computed the difference between the two time series (Pittsburgh appreciation minus US appreciation) over the last two decades and this is what it looks like.

So basically since 2007 or so we are in some unprecedented territory when it comes to how local real estate is performing compared to a national norm.  While I should know better than to presume, I think it is a safe bet there can be only rare and short (if any) periods in the decades before 1990 where local real estate outperformed the nation’s.  I bet you have to go back quite a few decades to find a comparable period where local real estate price appreciation has topped national trends for so many consecutive months.  You can’t just correlate it as a recession impact either.  Quite a few recessions over the last few decades where it looks like local real estate prices did not compare so favorably to the US.  This is an even more extreme case than the labor market trends which we also just learned April’s unemployment rate for the region was 6.8 percent, or 2.2 percentage points below the nation which is tied with one other month in 2009 as the largest gap by which the local unemployment rate has dipped below the nations in at least 40+ years if not significantly longer.  No small bit of news in that, not that anyone will notice.

The real estate time series is even more remarkable when you consider that we went from trailing the US trend by 6-8% points a year to gaining on the US by 6-8% points a year in such a quick period of time.  There was an inflection point you would have missed if you blinked.

* On a side note, that national real estate story linked there is from the same reporter who wrote the story on Pittsburgh that I really do believe was the spark that brought the G20 to Pittsburgh:  Remember: For Pittsburgh, there’s life after steel.

Jim Mustard: Is the Yukon Gold Rush Over-Hyped?

Jim Mustard Yukon explorers are just getting started, says Jim Mustard, vice president of investment banking, mining, at Vancouver-based PI Financial. In this exclusive interview with The Gold Report, he shares several of the Yukon companies he believes have the potential to produce significant returns for investors.

The Gold Report: A feature titled “Gold Mania in the Yukon” was published recently in The New York Times Magazine. Is this a sign that the recent Yukon gold rush is over-hyped?

Jim Mustard: I don’t believe that article was hyping the Yukon as it was really a human interest story about Shawn Ryan, who came to the Yukon as a mushroom picker. Mushroom pickers can make an awful lot of money over short periods of time and for most of the year they are idle. He was bitten by the mining bug and ended up, through perseverance and being mentored, developing a particular skill in taking and interpreting early-stage soil geochemical data. He has now capitalized on this several times over and is a significant shareholder in Ryan Gold Corp. (TSX.V:RYG). The article talked about his life, his living conditions, his family and his success. While his success and his very specific exploration ideas have spawned market interest in what is going on in the Yukon, the area is not over-hyped, in my opinion.

TGR: We’ve all heard about the Yukon being the first area play in Canada since the Lac de Gras diamond rush in the Northwest Territories during the early-to-mid ’90s. You’ve been in this business longer than most people in your position. Do you believe the Yukon is a true area play?

JM: The Yukon is, literally, a very large area play, but not necessarily focused on one type of commodity or geologic setting the way it was at Lac de Gras. During the Lac de Gras rush, we were all looking for kimberlites and only one commodity, or, if we went to Labrador, nickel was the primary focus within a somewhat narrowly-defined district. In those cases, we were looking for a fairly specific type of geologic setting that hosted only one key commodity. In the Yukon, we have a vast array of geologic domains that are permissive for a range of deposit types and commodities: from large copper-gold porphyry systems to high-grade veins. There are also copper deposits that are very unique, such as the Minto deposits, which is not porphyry copper, but are more structurally controlled in south-central Yukon.

At the other end of the spectrum, we have a brand-new and exciting exploration model. Carlin-style gold replacement occurrences have been discovered that, until last year, were previously unrecognized in the Yukon. Also present, and sometimes forgotten, are world-class SEDEX (Pb/Zn) deposits and high-grade meso-thermal silver-rich veins. The Yukon also hosts significant intrusion-related gold deposits in the Dublin Gulch-Mayo area (and perhaps in the Dawson range south of the White Gold area). Nickel and PGM deposits are present as well as a past-producing gold heap leach mine. Yukon has the hallmarks of a very large area of interest that’s woefully underexplored. The activity underway by a multitude of companies is sustainable for several years to come—likely much longer than Lac de Gras.

TGR: Before we started the interview, you mentioned that if you were still an analyst, you’d be all over the Yukon. Why would you be so excited?

JM: We’ve had technical success with discovery. We’ve had corporate success in terms of one company being bought out by a major company at a very early stage. We’ve also had a tremendous number of companies and individuals moving into the territory, acquiring ground, doing basic prospecting. These developments have led to rapid advancement. I believe there will be additional exploration success and additional M&A activity—this all equates to multiple opportunities, given that combined exploration budgets this year are likely to be close to $200M compared to an estimated $160M spent on exploration in 2010.

An analyst has an opportunity to follow and recommend companies based on strong technical data or the presence of “nearest neighbors” within one common jurisdiction with similar geological settings.

TGR: What is going to take us to the next level? Is it another major discovery?

JM: At the moment, we have two key areas in the Yukon: The White Gold Area (where Underworld Resources was focused) about halfway between Dawson and Whitehorse, and a carbonate inlier of the Selwyn Basin, where ATAC Resources Ltd. (TSX.V:ATC) has made a couple of Carlin-style discoveries on the Rackla Project, NE of Keno City.

Market sustainability is going to come from continuing success for companies such as ATAC or Kaminak Gold Corp. (TSX.V:KAM), which probably have the two most advanced exploration stage projects because of their success last year.

Along the way, if we have another discovery by another company that is not on people’s radar screens, it will further add to the interest.

TGR: You mentioned that these are very risky plays at the moment. What are some investing strategies you could offer our readers?

JM: One of the best strategies here is to look at a map. Out of some 100 companies operating in the area, find out which ones are at the mapping or prospecting or soil sampling stage and which ones are going to have a drill program this year. That’s one way to play the game. Invest in companies that will have a drill bit turning in the next several months because otherwise you might have to wait a full year before you see any progress given the seasonality in most of these areas.

You can also pick one or two companies that have a fairly large position in any one of the areas—companies that may be just starting out, but have successful neighbors. The market will generally add value because of the area play concept since there is still a fair amount of mystery about the geological setting—this is a key factor that will not last, but is likely to stay in place for at least two to three years.

The other way to choose a company is to review the technical data and talk to management. It’s always a challenge to pick out one soil anomaly from another soil anomaly. A basket approach can help mitigate the risk.

TGR: Are some Yukon companies employing management that has made significant discoveries in the past? Do some companies have more experience and, therefore, a bit less risk?

JM: Management that has made discoveries in the past and capitalized on those discoveries by either putting them into production, joint venturing them out or selling the company outright, bring an advantage because they have been through it before. In a technical sense, however, it’s always the luck of the draw.

TGR: Any specific names of companies with experienced teams?

JM: The one that comes to mind immediately is the ATAC/ Strategic Metals Ltd. (TSX.V:SMD) (the Strategic Exploration Group) because their history in the Yukon flows out of the consulting group Archer Cathro & Associates, which still exists. Archer Cathro has operated a consulting practice in the Yukon since the late ’60s. He has a legacy file of information on many early-stage projects that he managed on behalf of others over the years. That access to historic information allowed the company to acquire a tremendous number of properties.

Another one would be the technical group that came out of Underworld that made the discovery on the Golden Saddle area, which was taken over by Kinross Gold Corp. (TSX:K; NYSE:KGC). That management group is now behind Smash Minerals Corp. (TSX.V:SSH). Kaminak Gold, which I mentioned before, is strongly managed by Rob Carpenter.

Golden Predator Corp. (TSX:GPD) is another one that has a similar advantage because they recently hired a geologist away from the Yukon Geologic Survey. This individual, for probably 15 or 20 years, liaised with industry and visited many projects throughout the territory. He knows the Yukon geology better than most. That provides a lot of intelligence in managing that company and acquiring new properties or exploring existing properties.

TGR: And that individual would be Mike Burke.

JM: Mike Burke, yes.

TGR: You’re based in Vancouver. What projects in the White Gold district interest you?

JM: The one property that is probably the most advanced in the White Gold area is Kaminak’s Coffee Project, which has had a lot of drilling success. They anticipate operating four drills very shortly and a possible fifth one sometime later this summer. The company did a lot of soil sampling, prospecting and drilling last year. It is following up this year. So that’s one property that is going to see a lot of drilling and is probably going to lead the pack in that area.

Another company that is not that far away is Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd. (TSX.V:PEX). John Brock is a seasoned Yukon veteran. The company did some trenching and a lot of soil sampling last year on its Mariposa Project. It recently flew an airborne mag survey and is now back in the field, preparing to drill an area where they had a trench show about 30m of 1.25 g/t Au. This trench is within a soil geochemical anomaly (1100 x 600 meters) called Skookum Jim. Historically in the Yukon, anomaly recognition followed by some trenching has led to some early-stage drill bit discoveries. I would say Pacific Ridge is embarking on that pathway.

Early-stage companies in that area that are a bit more at the project generator or target generation stage include Ethos Capital Corp. (TSX.V:ECC; OTCQX:ETHOF), which has a fair amount of ground distributed in that same area, and Smash Minerals Corp. Smash Minerals has a very large land package on which they plan a program of grid soil sampling. The company has identified six high-priority areas to detail sample. Management intends to have a small drill program out of the gate later this summer or early fall.

TGR: Do any of these companies have projects directly related to Shawn Ryan’s work?

JM: A lot of these companies are taking more consistent soil samples at a deeper level and at a consistent horizon because of the success of his methods and his proven methodology. Because this part of the Yukon was not glaciated, we can correlate soil results as being in place—directly over bedrock sources. You don’t have to be concerned about a dispersal train that would occur in a glaciated area.

TGR: What are some companies you expect to see some influential drill results from this summer?

JM: Taku Gold Corp. (TSX.V:TAK; OTCBB:TAKUF) has a number of projects, some of which will see some drilling. I believe Silver Quest Resources Ltd. (TSX.V:SQI) will have one or two drill programs in that area as well. Wolverine Minerals Corp. (TSX.V:WLV) will be drilling a number of targets in the Dawson Range, south of the White Gold area.

TGR: When was the last time you saw something like this? Was it Lac de Gras?

JM: I think the Yukon play overshadows some of these other area plays because this is not just about one target or one commodity. There have been two successes in the near term: We’ve had Underworld taken over by Kinross, and then we had ATAC come out of the gate with a brand new geologic model that’s clearly captured the market’s attention.

The other reason this is sustainable is that there’s a lot of technical success here—many of these companies are very well managed technically, and they have gone to great lengths to educate investors. I could allude to Strategic and ATAC because of the newness and the time they have spent profiling their discoveries.

So, two discoveries and one takeover already. What’s going to sustain the area is more discoveries, or an expansion of those areas that have already seen a drill bit. We will, I believe, see more discoveries because the sustainability takes money, and the market has shown a lot of interest in the Yukon. With upwards of CAD$200M of expenditures this year on exploration alone, good things should happen. Come the fall, hopefully, we can table another discovery or two. A lot of fresh ideas and capital have come into the marketplace—this will sustain the interest—there’s no question in my mind.

TGR: As vice president of investment banking, are institutions coming to you saying that they want a stake in some of these plays in the Yukon?

JM: Yes, there continues to be a very healthy appetite for financing these companies. They’re in Canada, so there’s a lot of geopolitical security. Land claims have largely been settled. The government is supportive of mining. The area has a high degree of visibility and has had a lot of success in the past with several operating mines. There is a real opportunity and a real comfort for institutions.

TGR: What about new companies? Are people getting some properties, sending them into a shell company or doing an RTO, and then coming to you and saying “We need some cash?”

JM: The rate of company creation has been high over the last six months, as a lot of staking took place in the fall and winter. That has now translated to new companies. I think that will increase as we have additional discoveries, and as long as the capital market is there to finance these companies—new company creation will continue.

TGR: If there were a red flag anywhere in all of this, what would that be?

JM: The capital markets and the ability to raise money is one. But that does not impact the fundamentals near term as most companies are financed for their 2011 programs. Perhaps something out of the blue could impact markets—an environmental concern, a permitting concern or maybe, in some cases, exploration resources get overwhelmed.

TGR: If you were a betting man, Mr. Mustard, who would you give the best odds in terms of the first one to develop a mine?

JM: I tend to go to the companies that have led out of the pack, and I’ve mentioned Kaminak being one of them. In the White Gold area, they are the go-to company at the moment because they’ve got the largest budget and the most well-developed targets.

Beyond that, moving further northeast, you have ATAC Resources, which will have the largest exploration activity in the Yukon, a tremendous amount of drilling, a lot of heightened expectation, a lot of resources and a lot of expertise. So I would certainly rank them very high, however, they are a ways off from mine building. Alexco Resource Corp. (TSX:AXR; NYSE.A:AXU) has already built a mine at Keno Hill and, given some exploration success, could expand their operation.

Strategic Metals is another one because of the nature of that company; it has been an incubator of a number of other companies and has a large shareholding in several others. They also have significant properties that they’ll be drilling on, particularly a silver-lead-zinc property that is just northwest of Faro, where there’s very good infrastructure. That’s a fairly new discovery, and that project will see a tremendous amount of drilling.

Pacific Ridge is perhaps is a bit of a high-risk company because the property has not been drilled before, whereas ATAC, Kaminak and Strategic all have had a fair amount of drilling last summer. Golden Predator is another one because they’ve got Brewery Creek, where we saw some phenomenal drill intercepts already this year. They’ve got that project and they’ve got Clear Creek and Grew Creek as well, which is another asset that has had some recent successful drilling.

As far as the first new mine to be developed, it could be Victoria Gold Corp.’s (TSX.V:VIT) Eagle Gold Project where feasibility work is underway and they are targeting a production start-up during 2013.

TGR: What does the geology look like in the Yukon?

JM: We’re still at an early stage and haven’t identified all of the environments. Clearly there’s a lot of exploration left to do over the next few decades. But the Yukon is part of a regional geologic setting where world-class discoveries have been made. Exploration has been cyclical and it will likely continue that way to a certain degree. Now it has a lot of money being thrown at it on a sustained basis. That’s really, I suppose, what separates where we are now from where we were in the past. In the White Gold area, we have what I would call intrusive-related or breccia-related gold targets. We also have evidence of large bulk tonnage copper systems nearby. Casino is a billion-plus ton deposit with copper and gold that has been through a number of phases of exploration. Its challenge has been the fact that it’s a large bulk tonnage system and it needs good infrastructure. Infrastructure is one thing that is not that well developed in the Yukon. That’s why gold deposits have more attraction—because you can fly the gold bricks out—whereas copper concentrates require a bulk tonnage system.

There is a brand-new area being prospected for Nevada-style Carlin replacement gold deposits. A whole range of deposit types are clearly on the horizon for exploration and potential discovery.

The take away—our metallogenic (ore deposit formation) understanding of the Yukon is still very much in evolution.

TGR: Thank you so much for speaking with us.

Jim Mustard joined PI in October 2009 and brings an extensive range of capital-market and industry experience that spans multiple commodities in a global context of exploration, development and operations. Immediately prior to joining PI, Jim was at Canada Zinc Metals Corporation for two years and prior to that was a vice president and senior mining analyst at Haywood Securities for 11 years. Previous work periods also include several years in Latin America, two years with the Canadian federal government and five years of exploration in Yukon. Jim’s core strengths are his ability to recognize early to advanced-stage opportunities in a broad-based context of geological and economic factors and his extensive professional and financial network. “I believe the resource industry will continue its recent momentum over an even wider range of commodities than before, as global growth regains its former pace of expansion,” he says. Jim has a bachelor of applied science in geological engineering from Queens University, Kingston. He is a registered professional engineer with the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of BC.

Corporate fascist economic system

A Fistful Of Dollars:

Without Federal Reserve intervention in the financial markets since September 2008, the biggest banks in the world would have entered bankruptcy liquidation. The U.S. economy would have experienced a 10% to 20% fall in GDP. The unemployment rate would have soared above 15%. The stock market would have fallen 70%. Wealthy bondholders and stockholders would have seen their wealth cut in half. Incumbent politicians would have all been thrown out of office. The richest Americans, constituting the ruling class, would have borne the brunt of the pain.

In a true capitalist system, organizations and people who assumed too much risk and made poor decisions would have failed. But the United States does not have a capitalist system. We have a corporate fascist economic system where a small cartel of bankers, military weapons suppliers, and mega-corporations set the agenda for the country through their complete capture of politicians and the mainstream corporate media.

The Global Economy’s Corporate Crime Wave:

Corporate corruption is out of control for two main reasons. First, big companies are now multinational, while governments remain national. Big companies are so financially powerful that governments are afraid to take them on.

Second, companies are the major funders of political campaigns in places like the US, while politicians themselves are often part owners, or at least the silent beneficiaries of corporate profits. Roughly one-half of US Congressmen are millionaires, and many have close ties to companies even before they arrive in Congress.

As a result, politicians often look the other way when corporate behavior crosses the line. Even if governments try to enforce the law, companies have armies of lawyers to run circles around them. The result is a culture of impunity, based on the well-proven expectation that corporate crime pays.

Economic Events on June 2, 2011

The monthly Chain Store Sales report will be released today.  This report on sales in chain stores gives a look at the health of stores that make up about 10% of all retail sales.

At 8:30 AM EDT, the U.S. government will release its weekly Jobless Claims report.  The consensus is that there were 420 ,000 new jobless claims last week, which would would be 4,000 less than the previous week.

Also at 8:30 AM EDT, the Productivity and Costs report for the first quarter of 2011 will be released.  The consensus is that non-farm productivity increased by 1.7% in the last quarter and labor unit costs increased 0.8%.

At 9:45 AM EDT, the weekly Bloomberg Consumer Comfort Index will be released, providing an update on Americans’ views of the U.S. economy, their personal finances and the buying climate.

At 10:00 AM EDT, the Factory Orders report for April will be released.  The consensus is that there was a decrease of 0.9% in orders from the previous month.

At 10:30 AM EDT, the weekly Energy Information Administration Natural Gas Report will be released, giving an update on natural gas inventories in the United States.

At 11:00 AM EDT, the weekly Energy Information Administration Petroleum Status Report will be released, giving investors an update on oil inventories in the United States.

At 4:30 PM EDT, the Federal Reserve will release its Money Supply report, showing the amount of liquidity available in the U.S. economy.

Also at 4:30 PM EDT, the Federal Reserve will release its Balance Sheet report, showing the amount of liquidity the Fed has injected into the economy by adding or removing reserves.

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

Bloody Pirates

So John Nolte has a post at Big Hollywood that attempts to explain why DVD sales have declined.

Blu-Ray sales have cannibalized some DVD sales, as has the rise of RedBox, Netflix, and Hulu. But Nolte posits that this is not enough to explain the decline. He argues that the reason for the decline in sales is because Hollywood makes crappy product.

This reason seems shallow and highly limited. For one, Hollywood has always made crappy product. It used to be referred to as “b-movies.” Of course, Hollywood has turned pretentious as of late, so b-movies no longer exist, at least nominally.
Additionally, alternative media has had an impact of DVD sales. Google has pushed YouTube as a platform for feature length movies, which undoubtedly reduces the demand for movies in the theater or on DVD. People’s viewing time is limited, so if they watch things on YouTube, they won’t be able to watch other stuff.
Finally, Nolte fails to account for pirating. This isn’t a major oversight on his part, seeing as how there is not much data on the effect of pirating on DVD sales. Still, the popularity of torrent sharing sites would suggest that people are still watching a decent amount of movies, only now they are not paying for them.
Nolte is right in saying that Hollywood faces a revenue problem, but the issue isn’t necessarily a lack of quality films. It may simply be that Hollywood hasn’t figured out an effective business model for the age of the internet.

Does the OECD's 'better life index' sound like fun?

I am not sure the OECD’s better life index is meant to be fun. But I have had some fun playing with it. The index is interactive. The fun comes from giving different weight to 11 different criteria (or topics as they are described by the OECD) and then observing how this affects rankings of well-being of OECD countries.

The criteria used in the index are: housing, income, jobs, community (individuals’ perceptions of the quality of their support networks), education, environment (air pollution by tiny particulate matter), governance (voting and transparency), health, life satisfaction, safety (assaults and homicide) and work-life balance (working mothers, total hours worked and leisure).

Under the default setting, with all criteria being given equal weight, the countries that come out on top are Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Sweden. If you suppress all criteria other than income, Luxembourg is a long way ahead of the field, followed by the United States and Switzerland. The income measure used in the study (reflecting household financial income and wealth) has Australia in 14th place and New Zealand in 25th place.

The substantial difference between the outcomes of these weighting systems is interesting. In a previous post I observed that all well-being indicators tend to tell similar stories about well-being levels in different countries. The two observations are actually consistent. My research covered a larger number of countries, including many poor countries as well as the wealthy democracies of the OECD. Well-being indicators tend to tell a similar story when wealthy countries are compared with poor countries, but can tell different stories when wealthy countries are compared to each other.

Equal weighting of a range of indicators and a focus on income alone seems to me to be equally arbitrary approaches to well-being comparisons. Well-being is obviously affected by factors other than income, but it would be difficult to argue that all relevant factors are equally important. Value judgments have to be made to determine appropriate weights. An appropriate weighting system might be derived by conducting surveys to obtain weights reflecting the values of people in different countries. Alternatively, surveys could be used to obtain weights reflecting the values of people with different political views in particular countries, or across the whole of the OECD.

In the absence of such survey evidence, I have looked at the rankings for three somewhat extreme political groups drawn from my own imagination: Scrooges, Socioholics and Warm Fuzzies. As I imagine them, all three groups perceive governance and safety as being important to well-being. The Scrooges add income as the only additional factor. The Socioholics add housing, jobs, education and health in addition to income. The Warm Fuzzies exclude income and all the additional factors added by the Socioholics, but replace those factors with community, environment, life satisfaction and work-life balance.

So, which countries come out on top of the welfare rankings according to the values of these three political groups?

Scrooges: The countries that come out on top are Australia, Luxembourg and the United States. New Zealand is placed about 8th, behind Sweden, Austria, Canada and UK.

Socioholics: Australia and Canada come out on top, followed by New Zealand and the United States.

Warm Fuzzies: Australia, Denmark and Sweden are on top, followed by New Zealand, Canada and Norway.

What do I get out of this? My main observation is that Australia seems to come out fairly well, whatever coloured political lenses you use. The well-being of New Zealanders also looks fairly good, particularly if you adopt either a Socioholic or Warm Fuzzy perspective.

Having had some fun, the more serious question that comes to mind is whether a focus on the OECD’s well-being indicators (and other similar constructions) is likely to distract political attention away from much-needed economic reforms to improve the economic strength of some economies. For example, if well-being indicators suggest that people in some lovely country (New Zealand comes to mind) tend to enjoy living standards substantially higher than other countries with comparable per capita GDP levels, there may be a tendency for the government of that country to become complacent about establishing conditions more favourable to further improvement of living standards.

Tim Murray: Light Oil Is the Next Big Play for Energy Stocks

Tim Murray Light oil is the sweet spot for Jennings Capital Oil and Gas Analyst Tim Murray. He’s finding plays that tap into pools via horizontal drilling. In this exclusive interview with The Energy Report, Tim talks about finding big growth stories in small companies that require investors to take on a bit more risk.

The Energy Report: Tim, how do you describe your universe of coverage?
Tim Murray: It’s primarily small cap. So, I’m looking at market cap sub-CAD$500M, but we don’t like to get much smaller than CAD$50M. In between, we’re looking for themed ideas. The one theme that sticks out in my coverage universe is light oil. I call it my “tight light oil universe,” where I cover a number of companies focusing on developing assets with horizontal multi-stage fracture stimulations. The other focus is liquids-rich natural gas, however my universe is much smaller here, I only cover two names. I like to have a bigger company in my themes, and also a couple of small exploratory plays with a bit higher risk, but with bigger bang for your buck.

TER: Under-CAD$500M market cap means that small-cap mutual funds can buy in and still get doubles and triples out of companies starting at that size.

TM: Yep, no doubt about it. In the small-cap world, you’re not looking for 5% or 10% returns. You’re looking for meaningful returns. For higher-risk names, doubles and triples are possible. That’s what investors want out of the space, but these smaller-cap companies also carry a higher risk rating.

TER: Why light oil?

TM: When I transitioned over to Jennings Capital back in December of ‘09, we didn’t see any meaningful short- or medium-term reasons to be in the natural gas space. However, light oil, in our eyes, looked to be gaining momentum and the emergence of horizontal drilling and multi-stage fracks looked to be opening up a number of historic oil pools that had been developed vertically. Horizontal drilling had the potential to push pool boundaries and increase recovery factors. That’s exactly what happened the last two years in the basin. We still see meaningful growth potential for the light oil space at $100 oil and even lower commodity prices.

TER: You have so many buy-rated names in your universe of coverage. Does this mean that there’s a tremendous amount of value in small-cap oil and gas plays currently?

TM: The reason there are lots of buys in my universe is because we’ve got a pretty straightforward rating schedule. If my target price is over a 10% return, it must be a buy. As I mentioned earlier, in the small-cap world you need meaningful upside to justify the added risk so investors should really focus on my names with returns north of 20% and—for some of my riskier names—north of 50% would be ideal. I think there’s a lot of value to be found among small caps if oil remains above $95 per barrel.

If you are of the belief that there might be some short-term pullback in the price of oil, then you’ve got to be a little bit more selective. What I’d be looking for are companies with good balance sheets in order to complete meaningful capital programs and lots of future running room upon success. I think the downside risk is minimal on most of my light oil names assuming we stay above USD$95/bbl oil as light oil-focused companies should generate meaningful cash flow and balance sheets should remain strong. The one wild card will be operational success and the market will reward the companies that demonstrate this.

TER: Are these companies in your universe actually growth stories, and can they continue to be growth stories if the price of oil remains stable?

TM: Yes. Most of the names I cover in my small-cap universe are growth companies. There’s only one that I would call a modest-growth story from a production standpoint: Equal Energy Ltd. (TSX:EQU; NYSE:EQU). If oil stays above USD$95/bbl, the companies in my light oil universe are all generating meaningful cash flow relative to their size. And the smaller ones, such as Novus Energy Inc. (TSX.V:NVS), Torquay Oil Corp. (TSX.V:TOC.A; TSX.V:TOC.B), Reliable Energy Ltd. (TSX:REL), could double and triple production in the next two years.

TER: What else are you telling investors?

TM: Obviously, we like the light oil space in general, and another name I like that is the cheapest in our light oil space is Renegade Petroleum Ltd. (TSX.V:RPL). This story has been a laggard in my light oil coverage group as they missed guidance targets the last couple of quarters, so the market’s a little bit leery of the story. However, this is one of the cheaper names in my light oil space and we do like the company’s assets and believe they should be able to add meaningful production into 2012. Renegade has also drilled its first exploratory horizontal Bakken well in Renville, North Dakota, which has seen very little Bakken activity. The well is currently waiting on a frack crew, so we should have well results out closer to the third quarter. They have access to 48 gross sections (50% working interest) so meaningful running room upon success.

TER: Will Renegade’s cash flow support its capital expenditure requirements? Will it necessarily have to go back to the market?

TM: The company did an equity raise of CAD$46M early this year and recently received an increase to its bank, so it has lots of capacity on the balance sheet to fund the going forward capital program.

The tightest light oil company in my universe, balance sheet-wise, is Midway Energy Ltd. (TSX:MEL). If the company can hit our production forecasts, it should be fine. However, any operational hiccups could lead to the balance sheet becoming extremely stretched.

I also have two “W” companies, WestFire Energy Ltd. (TSX:WFE) and Wild Stream Exploration Inc. (TSX.V:WSX). I like both of these companies, which are once again both targeting light oil. WestFire has two Viking plays—one in Redwater, and the other in Dodsland. I think there’s considerable running room on the Dodsland area in Saskatchewan and WestFire has had tremendous success to date at Redwater.

TER: Is there any stimulus or catalyst that could move WestFire?

TM: Oh, for sure. Right now the bulk of the first quarter activity was at Redwater. NAL, along with several other operators, have regulatory approval to drill 32 wells per section, but I only carry 12 wells per section in my models. I must point out that NAL’s 32-well design carries a smaller recovery factor per well than my 12 wells, however, this generally shows the ultimate recovery factors could be larger than we currently assign. WestFire will also become active again in the greater Dodsland area after spring break up and this is the company’s largest asset, so any exploratory success should help move the stock higher.

TER: The reason I ask about catalysts is because WestFire’s market cap is already up to CAD$386 million and the company’s shares are up almost 60% in the last six months.

TM: Many of the light oil stories have appreciated since Q410 due to good operational success and the rising oil price. WestFire is one of those as we were pushing the story hard in the summer months (around August) when it had sold off quite a bit and we thought that it was overdone. Since then, the story has rallied very hard, and outperformed the peer group early into 2011. We still think there’s significant long-term value in the WestFire story as the company has a very large inventory of light oil wells. It just needs to spend additional capital to prove up the resource and, ultimately, capture the value in the ground.

I couple that with my other “W” story, Wild Stream, which has assets in Saskatchewan and Alberta. To date, it’s done the best in adding production and reserves of my light oil space. Through acquisitions, they have added acreage and production in all its core areas, giving them further running room. It has three light oil plays and there is an emerging fourth, so, it’s probably the deepest of the juniors that I cover and also the largest in size. I like the scope of all its plays and we expect its first horizontal well on the fourth light oil play at Swan Hills in the second half of 2011. Wild Stream did lag our light oil group in early 2011, however, we think it’s very well positioned going forward and momentum should pick up again in the second half of the year.

TER: You mentioned Equal Energy. You wrote a research note saying it was very cheap. It sounds like a value.

TM: Yeah, it’s definitely a value play right now. It trades well below our 1P net asset value (NAV) of $10.40 per share and 2P NAV of $12.35. Most companies trade closer to their 2P NAV and we think Equal should trade at least in-line with our 1P NAV of $10.40. On top of this, we feel the reserve report is modestly booked on a 2P basis, giving investors further exposure to the upside.

We don’t model Equal actually growing in production this year, but it’s not a major concern to us because the company has moved all its capital to focus on light oil and liquids-rich prospects. Even though production is relatively flat, we see cash flow increasing 30% year over year, which we believe should help fund production growth in the future.

Equal has three light oil plays, two of which are in Canada, the Alliance Viking play in the Halkirk area and the Cardium light oil play at Lochend. Equal also has an emerging Mississippian play on its Oklahoma assets, which SandRidge Energy Inc. (NYSE:SD) and Chesapeake Energy Corp. (NYSE:CHK) are chasing very hard. Equal has very little booked in its year-end reserve report for the Viking and Cardium and nothing for the Mississippian play, once again exposing investors to further upside.

TER: The market has been very fond of this play. It looks like it is up 71% over the past six months and 31% over the past three months, and you have a 40% implied upside from current levels. Could Equal still represent lower risk than many of your plays?

TM: Yeah. We think the downside on this company is marginal as it trades below our 1P NAV. The next task for management is demonstrating success on its three light oil plays and further activity on the liquids-rich Hunton asset should help with further momentum for the stock. Ultimately if the market is not willing to extend value to its assets they may have to look to industry and sell some assets and become either focused in Canada or the US.

TER: Are there any other types of plays you like?

TM: There is one other I would like to highlight. Palliser Oil & Gas Corp. (CVE:PXL) is focused on heavy oil, primarily in Saskatchewan. The company is targeting legacy heavy oil pools that are well-defined and looking at increasing recovery factors by applying some more modern technology as several of the pools were drilled up to 20 years ago. It is employing a technique called High Volume Lift (HVL), which is essentially putting on higher-rate pumps as the water cuts increase on the wells. The company has had some very good success to date with this application. We carry essentially no upside for the HVL technique in our models as we would like to see some further production data on the wells first. The stock did very well early in 2011 and recently has sold off. At current levels, we think the stock is very attractively priced.

TER: Best wishes, Tim. Thank you.

TM: Much appreciated.

Prior to joining Jennings Capital Inc. in December 2009, Tim Murray held the position as an Oil & Gas Analyst at Salman Partners Inc. and Northern Securities Inc. covering junior and mid-cap companies. Tim spent over a year at AltaGas Income Trust performing risk and credit analysis on the company’s midstream business for natural gas and power assets. Prior to that, he was an Investment Advisor for three years. Tim obtained his CFA in 2003.

Economic Events on June 1, 2011

The figures for motor vehicle sales in May will be released today.  The consensus estimate is that 9.7 million domestic autos were sold last month, which would be a decrease of 400,000 from the previous month.

The Mortgage Bankers’ Association purchase index was released at 7:00 AM EDT, and there was no week to week change in the Purchase Index and a week to week decrease of 5.7% in the Refinance Index.

The Challenger Job-Cut Report will be released at 7:30 AM EDT, providing an estimate of the number of layoffs in May.

At 7:45 AM EDT, the weekly ICSC-Goldman Store Sales report will be released, giving an update on the health of the consumer through this analysis of retail sales.

At 8:15 AM EDT, the ADP Employment Report will be released.  Investors will be watching this number to get advance notice on the state of the job market in advance of the government’s report on Friday.

At 8:55 AM EDT, the weekly Redbook report will be released, giving us more information about consumer spending.

At 10:00 AM EDT, the Construction Spending report for April will be released, and the consensus is that there was an increase of 0.1% in spending compared to the previous month.

Also at 10:00 AM EDT, the ISM manufacturing index for May will be released.  The consensus estimate is that it decreased 2.9 points last month to a value of 57.5, and will continue to signal economic growth as it remains above the mid-point of 50.

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts