By B.P.T., on March 17th, 2011
At 8:30 AM EDT, the U.S. government will release its weekly Jobless Claims report. The consensus is that there were 385,000 new jobless claims last week, which would would be 12,000 less than the number released last week.
Also at 8:30 AM EDT, the Consumer Price Index report for February will be released. The consensus is that CPI increased by 0.4% last month, with a 0.1% increase in CPI when food and energy are removed.
At 9:15 AM EDT, the Industrial Production report for February will be released. The consensus is that there will be an increase 0f 0.6% in production and an increase of 0.4% in industrial capacity utilization.
At 10:00 AM EDT, the Leading Indicators report for February will be released. The consensus is that this index increased by 1.0% last month, which would be the seventh month of improvement in a row.
Also at 10:00 AM EDT, the Philadelphia Fed Survey report for March will be released. The consensus is that the index will be at 32, which would be an decrease of 3.9 points from the previous month.
At 10:30 AM EDT, the weekly Energy Information Administration Natural Gas Report will be released, giving an update on natural gas inventories in the United States.
At 4:30 PM EDT, the Federal Reserve will release its Money Supply report, showing the amount of liquidity available in the U.S. economy.
Also at 4:30 PM EDT, the Federal Reserve will release its Balance Sheet report, showing the amount of liquidity the Fed has injected into the economy by adding or removing reserves.
By Winton Bates, on March 16th, 2011
I had thought about writing something about gift giving before Christmas, but it might have looked as though I was complaining about how difficult it can be to buy gifts for people who seem to have just about everything they need already. (Perhaps I might even now be wandering into dangerous territory.)
In the past, economists have had some difficulty in understanding why people exchange gifts. The reason is that since the satisfaction that a person obtains from consumption spending is determined by her or his personal preferences it is difficult for anyone else to know what she or he would like. (I hope this is getting me out of trouble rather than digging a deeper hole.) Thus, some people end up with gifts they don’t want. (Fortunately, this rarely happens to me!) The remedy some economists have proposed is predictably crass: give money not goods. Neerav Bhatt has provided an entertaining discussion of this view here, including a clip from an episode of Seinfeld showing Elaine’s reaction to Jerry’s gift of cash for her birthday.
Greg Mankiw provides a good economic explanation of gift-giving in terms of signaling theory. If a person is able to provide a thoughtful gift – despite the difficulty of discovering what the receiver would really like – this sends a signal of the feelings that the giver has toward the receiver.
I suppose that is how gift giving helps to strengthen bonds. It can be wonderful when that happens. (In my experience it is most likely to happen when the potential receiver of the gift is willing to send some signals by dropping a hint or two about what she might like.)
The exchanges of gifts among members of social and business organizations at Christmas functions etc. is presumably also intended to promote bonding. One approach, which is probably fairly common, is for everyone attending such functions to buy and wrap an inexpensive gift, with all gifts being distributed randomly at the function. A member of a club that I belong to recently proposed a different approach: the names of all members would be put in a hat and each person would draw out a name and buy a gift anonymously for that person. This might have resulted in more people being given things that they might appreciate and might have helped to bond individual members of the club to all other members. It seems likely that if you know that the person who has given you a gift that you appreciate is a member of the club, but you don’t know who it is, you might have good feelings towards all other members. (As it happened, the club decided to continue with the practice established a couple of years earlier of donating gifts for children to a local charity rather than exchanging gifts between members. It would be interesting to know if the proposed method of gift exchange has been used elsewhere and what the effects have been.)

While bonding helps explain exchanges of gifts between close friends and members of some organizations, does it is also explain exchanges of gifts between people who don’t know each other well? Exchanges of gifts between people in different organizations in the modern business world can be viewed as gestures of goodwill (albeit often tax deductible). Some anthropologists and archaeologists have encouraged the view that such exchanges of gifts to establish goodwill were much more common in tribal societies. According to this view, people in pre-industrial economies exchanged gifts to cement relationships, but people in modern economies trade with each other to make profits. Matt Ridley  suggests that is ‘patronising bunk’ (‘The Rational Optimist’, p. 133-4).
As Ridley suggests, there is no reason to suppose that traders in all cultures have not always been acutely aware of the desirability of getting a good bargain for the valuable items that they are exchanging. There is some evidence that money can change the way that people perceive exchanges, but this seems to me to be based on misconceptions about money. An exchange of goods with strict reciprocity (barter) might appear more like an exchange of gifts than a commercial transaction, but people are fooling themselves if they think it is different in important respects (other than possible tax avoidance) from an identical exchange facilitated with the use of money.
By Ajay Shah, on March 16th, 2011
One essential feature of the rule of law is transparency. When a government says something, it must say why it said so. This is important from three points of view:
- A government that does not need to explain itself is one that has arbitrary power. When a policeman can tell you that you’re
prohibited from driving because he does not like your face, it is rule of men and not rule of law.
- The fundamental idea of common law is that the laws enshrine principles that are unvarying for decades or centuries. But
institutional and technological details of the economy change rapidly. Well reasoned orders tell the households and firms of the economy how timeless principles are to be interpreted in the present milieu.
- The aggrieved party can appeal against the order, on the grounds that there are factual errors or errors of reasoning in the
order.
A success story: A recent SEBI order
I picked up a recent SEBI order banning a brokerage services agency from operating for two weeks. The punishment is not all that bad: the firm is out of business for two weeks. Yet, before inflicting such a penalty, SEBI had to do the following hard work in the order:
- Point out when the investigation was ordered.
- Clearly state which rules were violated. A vague reference to a governing Act does not suffice.
- Informs the reader about when the affected company was asked to respond. It also mentions that the copy of the investigation report was given to the company.
- The order then mentions the advocates who appeared for the accused.
- The findings of the enquiry officer are summarised.
- The observations of the enquiry officer are recorded.
- The arguments that the broker made in defense of its actions are presented.
- The exact transactions which were found to be illegal are described.
- The reasoning of the officer making the order is clearly laid out.
- The amount of penalty (suspension of certificate to trade for two weeks) is clearly mentioned.
This is a nice example of legal process in operation. It is a reasoned legal order. Anyone can read and understand it. The order adds to the body of law of securities in the country. It gives an example of the transactions which are considered illegal by SEBI: everyone can learn from the order and not make the same mistake. An appellate court can read the order and decide whether the action of SEBI was fair or not. More generally, SEBI is accountable to the public at large and Parliament in particular, to behave in such controlled
fashion.
The right to operate is a very valuable thing. Interfering with the life and liberty of an individual or firm must not be taken
lightly. By providing a detailed order, SEBI clearly shows why this right was withdrawn from a person.
A failure story: A recent RBI order
A recent update from the Reserve Bank is a study in contrast. The order prohibits a company from providing money transfer services to India. The text just states that the company is barred from operating in India under the Payments and Settlement Systems Act, 2007. It seems that the company had applied for a licence for operating in India and that application has been rejected.
The order is not reasoned. It does not inform the reader as to why the company was banned. Did the company not comply with rules? If so, which rules did it not comply with? Were there any other reasons, such as inadequate capital, or lax oversight, or failure to enforce KYC rules, which led to RBI denying them the permission? Was there any other required disclosure that the company did not make? Was any hearing given to the affected party? The order/press release also does not state the procedure that RBI used to come to its conclusion.
This is not how common law should function. The order does not add to the body of law in the country. Prospective businesses do not
learn what led to the rejection of the application and may continue to make the same mistake when they apply.
Conclusion
The agenda for legal reform in India consists of (a) writing laws rooted in the common law framework, (b) of building agencies such as
SEBI which are fully imbued in this ethos, and then (c) of building top quality courts like SAT which exert checks and balances upon
regulatory agencies.
Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts
By B.P.T., on March 16th, 2011
At 7:00 AM EST, the Mortgage Bankers’ Association purchase index will be released, where the Purchase Index shows the change in demand for new mortgages and the Refinance Index shows the change in demand for refinancing of existing mortgages.
At 8:30 AM EST, the Housing Starts report for February will be released. The consensus is that construction on 560,000 new homes were started last month, which would be an decrease of 36,000 from the previous month.
Also at 8:30 AM EST, the Current Account for the fourth quarter of 2010 will be released, which will provide information about the international trade balance with the United States.
Also at 8:30 AM EDT, the Producer Price Index for February will be released. The consensus is that the index increased 0.7% over last month, and increased 0.2% when food and energy are excluded.
At 10:30 AM EST, the weekly Energy Information Administration Petroleum Status Report will be released, giving investors an update on oil inventories in the United States.
By The Gold Report, on March 15th, 2011
Well, you can’t eat gold either. But at least gold is easier to carry around, says precious metals pundit Bob Moriarty. In this exclusive interview with The Gold Report, Moriarty lays out his forecast for the U.S. government (ousted), banks (collapsed) and why he still has significant stakes in precious metal equities despite his doomsday predictions.
The Gold Report: When we last spoke in October, our conversation focused on quantitative easing in the U.S. Since then, there’s been a lot of news focused on the Middle East and North Africa. The people of Tunisia and Egypt have successfully overturned their governments. Now there are significant civil uprisings in Libya, Bahrain and Yemen.
Bob Moriarty: The cause of all the turmoil in the Middle East—and what’s going on in Wisconsin for that matter—has nothing to do with religion. It has nothing to do with democracy. It has everything to do with the cost of food.
Either Ben Bernanke is the dumbest guy in the known universe or the biggest liar—and perhaps both. He says that the Federal Reserve’s second round of quantitative easing, QE2, has nothing to do with the cost of fuel and food. Of course it does. He has been wrong about every single thing he’s said since he took office.
When people are hungry, they start riots. The riots in Egypt were directly related to the cost of food. The riots in Wisconsin are being framed as union versus anti-union. But it is really about people being afraid they won’t be able to feed their families.
In the U.S., the problem is that the government can’t afford the outrageous sums that it’s paying union members for retirements. As many as 90% of members are retiring on permanent disability in some unions. California couldn’t balance its budget even if it fired every state employee. We have too much government.
TGR: To what extent do you think Wisconsin is a harbinger of government cutbacks to follow in other states?
BM: Wisconsin is the canary in the coal mine. The funny thing is that Wisconsin isn’t the state that is in the worst shape. California, Michigan or maybe New York, is in the worst shape.
Do you know how long it will take for the U.S. government to fail? Nineteen days.
TGR: How do you arrive at 19 days?
BM: Because that’s how long it took in Egypt.
TGR: Do you think this unrest is going to overflow into the oil-rich countries, like Saudi Arabia?
BM: Absolutely. The media is highlighting the Middle East, but unrest has occurred in Croatia, Albania, France, England and Greece as well. The breadth of these uprisings is connected to the power of the Internet. These crowds can communicate because of Twitter, Facebook, Google, instant messaging and e-mail. People have the ability, on an individual basis, to take command of the situation. This has never before occurred, and it’s a very important concept.
If the U.S. has riots and we overthrow the government, which I absolutely believe is going to happen, we’re no better off. The debt still exists.
The entire world needs to go back to real-world economics—supply and demand. The economy needs to start producing things of value. This is literally a worldwide revolution.
TGR: So, if it’s 19 days to overthrow a figurehead government, how much time does it take until some regulatory body is able to create food, jobs or a middle class?
BM: If there isn’t any real money, which is gold and silver, probably 20 years.
TGR: What if you’re Saudi Arabia and you have oil?
BM: Have you ever tried to eat oil?
TGR: You can’t eat gold or silver either.
BM: You could trade it for food. There are no individual companies in Saudi Arabia running the oil business; rather, it’s the government of Saudi Arabia. If the government fails, then oil refining and oil shipping stops immediately. It’s already happened in Libya, but Libya’s only 1.2% of world oil production, and Saudi Arabia is about 14%.
After the Yom Kippur War in 1973, Saudi Arabia was very upset with the U.S. for supporting Israel and declared an oil embargo. But what really happened was that the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) started raising the price of oil across the board. Oil went from about $0.15 in 1969 to several dollars a barrel. There was another crisis in 1979, when the Shah of Iran was overthrown. Oil shot up to $12 or $15 a barrel, which was enormous.
TGR: Shouldn’t we be getting out of equities, and getting into precious metals, at this time?
BM: I define investing in gold and silver primarily as being an insurance policy. I believe that everybody should own some gold and silver. I had a meeting with a billionaire yesterday and I told him exactly the same thing. You could have hundreds of billions of dollars and not have the ability to buy gasoline.
Owning gold and silver is something that prudent people should do. I’m not saying that people need to go buy silver at $34/oz. because it’s going to $500/oz. I’m saying people need to own some silver, and I don’t give a damn what the price is today because they may want to buy some food and gasoline down the road.
TGR: Let’s assume our readers own physical gold and silver. Should they be pulling out of equities?
BM: You always need a spectrum of investments. Once they get past physical gold and silver as an insurance policy and investment, investors have got to put money into something. I keep most of my liquid assets in equities, even though I believe that we’re on the verge of a major collapse in the stock market, and gold and silver shares could absolutely get whacked.
TGR: Currently, gold is doing quite well and silver is doing even better. Are there certain types of mining or junior equities that investors should be looking at?
BM: I avoid the popular areas in investment. Investors should want to get into investments when nobody wants them. That’s when they’re cheap.
TGR: Do you believe that metal juniors are popular now, or that they are yet to become popular? A lot of the mainstream investment shows and media really aren’t talking about gold yet.
BM: I think we are in phase two of three. But I’m seeing a lot of scary things—like “market experts” forecasting that silver could go to $500/oz. I could see silver at $40/oz. in the short term, but I could see it at $20/oz. in six months. Silver at $34/oz. is pretty expensive.
TGR: A lot of people are speculating that silver will go higher. I haven’t heard $500/oz., but we’re looking at that gold:silver ratio.
BM: They’re wrong about the gold:silver ratio. Historically in the U.S., it was 17:1, but we were using silver for coins. Nobody in the world uses silver for coins now, so most of the demand is as a commodity. Unless we go back to silver coins, I don’t see the ratio going to 17:1.
TGR: No one really uses gold coins now either.
BM: True, but almost all the gold ever produced is still above ground. Gold gets recycled. Silver gets used. It’s a commodity. At today’s prices, there is something like $8 trillion worth of gold in the world. I doubt very seriously that there’s $500 billion worth of silver.
TGR: You mentioned that you still have a large part of your liquid assets in equities. Can you share a couple of companies that you find particularly compelling?
BM: I’ve seen some really great stories. I went out to Guyana, South America last week and met with Sandspring Resources Ltd. (TSX.V:SSP). It has a green stone belt shear zone deposit, which can be giant systems. Across the border in Venezuela is the Las Cristinas gold project, one of the largest deposits in Latin America.
Sandspring has 6 Moz. of one-gram gold at surface. It’s going to be a really successful operation. It has a $300 million market cap and should probably have a $1 billion market cap. The company has $50 million in the bank. That’s going to set a floor underneath its stock.
Evolving Gold Corp. (TSX.V:EVG; Fkft:EV7), Gold Canyon Resources Inc. (TSX.V:GCU) and EurOmax Resources Limited (TSX.V:EOX) keep coming up with home runs. Stock in Timmins Gold Corp. (TSX.V:TMM) went from $0.40 to $2.25 recently. Stock in Rio Alto Mining Limited (TSX.V:RIO; BVL:RIO; OTCQX:RIOAF) went from $0.50 to $2.35 recently. There are some wonderful opportunities to invest in now.
TGR: What’s new at EurOmax? In September, you were not saying too many nice things about it.
BM: Most junior companies out there are stock promotions. The company is run strictly for the benefit of management. There was a management change at EurOmax, which was a good thing.
EurOmax had a half dozen world-class projects that had no direction. A major shareholder started a little revolution to get the management changed. The management was voted out 3-to-1, but they said they were not leaving. I believe that they spent $2.3 million trying to defend an indefensible position, but eventually the company got new management.
Now the company is actually advancing its projects and communicating its story. It’s still a very cheap stock at $0.36.
TGR: Are there other inexpensive juniors out there?
BM: Gold Port Resources Ltd. (TSX.V:GPO) in Guyana is in a spring stone thermal system, similar to those in Ghana, Mali and Burkina Faso, Africa. It’s all the same kind of rock. These are multi-million-ounce deposits.
Gold Port probably has a couple of million ounces identified already and it’s got a $15 million market cap. The company hired some people to do an NI 43-101. When I heard that, I went out literally this morning and bought shares at $0.15 each. It will be making a lot of progress.
TGR: How close is Gold Port to the Sandspring project?
BM: Very close, maybe 30 miles.
TGR: Are they part of the same system near Las Cristinas?
BM: Yes, it’s called the Guiana Shield.
TGR: We’ve discussed Comstock Mining Inc. (OTCBB:LODE) in the past. What’s going on with it now?
BM: Its plan was to be in production at 20,000 to 25,000 oz. per year in May. They have backed off that time prediction but still say they will be in production this year. That would be a giant accomplishment. It would be making money hand over fist. I would like to see more action, and more communication, from the company. But it has a big district—if it actually gets into production as it planned, it will be self-funded.
TGR: Is the stock price currently reflecting production this year?
BM: I don’t think it is. Everybody’s gotten bored. When I wrote about the stock, it went up from $2.80 to about $4.40. It’s at about $2.90 now. It’s a good story. However, the management needs to do more and communicate more.
TGR: What is the probability that it will go into production this year?
BM: I don’t think there’s any issue. It has a mill. It has a production facility. It was just going to bring in some equipment. It’s fully permitted. The company was previously in production. It was just going to upgrade the equipment.
TGR: Another stock that you follow and commented on in the past is Animas Resources Ltd. (TSX.V:ANI).
BM: Animas was down in Mexico, but it never got traction there. The company has made a shift of focus to Nevada. Animas actually picked up a project that I looked at 10 years ago. I’m sure the company will be drilling. It’s got really qualified people. I think that it will be successful one of these days.
TGR: Kiska Metals Corp. (TSX.V:KSK) was on your list for quite a while. It had a nice run-up in its stock.
BM: Kiska is in Alaska—big potential. With gold at $1,400/oz., Kiska could be making money hand over fist. It is still an exploration company, but it is moving forward. There haven’t been any home runs, but it is well financed. If you can’t make money at these prices, you should be raising moose.
There’s a road that goes right past Kiska to the NovaGold Resources Inc. (TSX:NG; NYSE.A:NG) Donlin Creek deposit. If NovaGold chooses that road, it would be very beneficial for Kiska because it has to bring everything in by air now.
TGR: Any other thoughts you’d like to leave with our readers?
BM: Investors should be looking at graphite companies. Graphite is a metal that’s been ignored. There’s big potential there. There are just a few juniors that have started mining graphite.
I believe there is going to be a correction in gold and silver. It’s not something that panics me, but people are making too much money and are getting too bullish.
TGR: Do you think the correction will be more than 10%?
BM: Absolutely. Silver can correct 10% in one day.
TGR: What about in gold?
BM: I’m a contrarian. I would rather see gold go down to $900. That wouldn’t hurt my feelings at all.
TGR: It’s a privilege, Bob. Thanks for being so forthright.
Convinced that gold and silver were at a bottom, and wanting to give others a foundation for investing in resource stocks, Bob and Barb Moriarty brought 321gold.com to the Internet almost 10 years ago, and later added 321energy.com to cover oil, natural gas, gasoline, coal, solar, wind and nuclear energy. Both sites feature articles, editorial opinions, pricing figures and updates on the current events affecting both sectors. Before his Internet career, Moriarty was a Marine F-4B and O-1 pilot with more than 820 missions in Vietnam. A captain at age 22, he was one of the most highly decorated pilots in the war and the youngest naval aviator in Vietnam. He holds 14 international aviation records, and once flew an airplane through the Eiffel Tower’s pillars “just for fun.”
By B.P.T., on March 15th, 2011
At 7:45 AM EDT, the weekly ICSC-Goldman Store Sales report will be released, giving an update on the health of the consumer through this analysis of retail sales.
At 8:30 AM EDT, the Empire State manufacturing index for March will be released. The consensus is that the index value will be 16, which would be an increase of 0.57 points from February.
Also at 8:30 AM EDT, the Import and Export Prices index for February will be released, providing some data that can be used to monitor the threat of inflation.
At 8:55 AM EDT, the weekly Redbook report will be released, giving us more information about consumer spending.
At 9:00 AM EDT, the Treasury International Capital report for January will be released, showing the flow of capital in and out of the United States economy.
At 10:00 AM EDT, the Housing Market Index for March will be announced. This index is created from a survey of home builders, so it shows the confidence that the sector has in the overall economy and their business.
At 2:15 PM EDT, the FOMC Meeting Announcement will be made, which will provide insight into how long the Federal Reserve plans to keep rates at 0%. It is assumed that there will be no immediate change in the Fed funds target rate, but any hint that rates could rise in the future could have an impact on the bond market and stock market.
By Doug Gentry, on March 14th, 2011
This column in the March 7, 2011 edition of The New Yorker has an interesting perspective on economic development – particularly in the Middle East. In the language of my University Seminar class, here’s the claim presented by James Surowiecki
The autocracies of the Arab world have been as economically destructive as they’ve been politically repressive. That’s no coincidence. Healthy economies need a thriving and independent private sector, where resources are allocated by markets and competition, and where small and medium-sized businesses can flourish. But in most of the Middle East the state and big business are so tightly intertwined as to be indistinguishable, and competition has been discouraged in favor of central planning and private monopolies.
In my Principles of Macroeconomics class we work on prioritizing investment options to improve long run economic development in the African country of Sudan. And in the first week of class we talk about scarce resources in countries – sometimes including a culture of entrepreneurship as one of the key ingredients of economic health. Surowiecki’s analysis makes but it also relies heavily on western, classical assumptions about individual incentives for innovation and risk taking. Are we missing a perspective here?
By The Gold Report, on March 14th, 2011
 Sprott Money executives Eric Sprott (chairman) and Larisa Sprott (president), sing the praises of the “poor man’s gold” in this exclusive interview with The Gold Report. “All the data supports the thesis that silver is undervalued,” says Eric—who serves as chairman of Sprott Inc., as well as CEO, CIO and senior portfolio manager of Sprott Asset Management LP. “We’ll certainly see a three-digit price,” he adds. Larisa explains how the company’s business model differs from others in the space and reveals plans to open Sprott Money USA within the year.
The Gold Report: Your Markets at a Glance commentary last November said it seemed unlikely that silver would stay under $30 for long. Four months later, the spot price is about $35. Are you surprised by how quickly your prediction came true?
Eric Sprott: Not really. Based on fundamental evidence, technical evidence and other things going on in the markets, I thought silver would be explosive this year. I’ve probably fallen a little short of my targets, but I think it’s going higher. Silver doesn’t have to hit $50 for everyone who’s involved with it to make outsized returns, but I thought it could reach $50 within the first half of this year. All the data supports the thesis that silver is undervalued.
TGR: Are you seeing $50 as a top price, or a new baseline?
ES: Lots of things may happen in the short term that have no bearing on the long term. Silver now trades at a price ratio of about 40:1 to gold. In other words, it takes 40 ounces of silver price to equal one ounce of gold. The historical ratio is more like 16:1. My view is that we will go back to 16:1 within two to five years. To put that in perspective, a $1,600 gold price would imply $100 for silver. I happen to believe that gold will go much higher than $1,600; therefore, given time and letting this ratio play out, I think we’ll certainly see a three-digit price for silver.
TGR: So, $50 may even become the floor.
ES: It’s a step on the way. It may come faster or it may take a little longer; but when it happens, silver will outperform gold 3:1. That’s a shockingly large difference and good reason to get a little more involved in silver.
TGR: You’ve said that silver will be this decade’s gold.
ES: We assembled the gold articles we wrote over the last decade into a compendium called Gold the Investment of the Decade and these are also archived and available on our website. Now that we’re in the second year of another decade, I’d say silver will be the investment of this decade. Gold essentially blew everything away in the last decade. There was no contest whatsoever with any currency or stock market. I think we’ll all look back 10 years from now and say silver was the investment of this decade, because it might triple the performance of gold—and I think gold will continue to outperform all other currencies and stock markets. So I think silver’s really an area where people should focus very heavily.
TGR: This performance you’re describing can’t be based primarily on manufacturing demand. How much do you anticipate in the way of investment demand?
ES: There are two parts to the silver story. One is industrial demand and one is investment demand. Industrial demand has been quite strong, but the thing that’s been very unusual in the last year or two has been the marked increase in investment demand. There are many ways of viewing investment demand, and it’s obvious we’re going to experience some serious growth here. Judging from the data points that we look at, and as Larisa would mention, when we look at our sales of gold and silver bullion, we’re actually selling about five times more dollars of silver than we are dollars of gold. That means we’re selling 200 times more silver bullion than gold bullion. The U.S. Mint is selling as many dollars of silver coins as dollars of gold coins. GoldMoney.com, an online precious metals bank, also has sales of silver and gold that are about equal.
I want to emphasize that we’re dealing with the flow of money here. The price difference is 40:1; but with that kind of money flowing into this commodity versus that commodity, you also have to look at the availability of one versus the other. In this case, believe it or not, that’s 1:87—there’s $1 of silver available in the world for every $87 worth of gold. The number of coins is explosively larger than the dollar figure. Something has to give when you have the same amount of money going into two products that are priced 40:1.
TGR: Perhaps Larisa could tell us a little bit about what’s happening with Sprott Money, including a comparison to other precious metal investment alternatives.
Larisa Sprott: Sprott Money buys and sells gold and silver bullion, which includes coins, bars and wafers. We either physically deliver it or store it. Our storage depository is located in the State of Delaware. Within the next 6–12 months, we will be opening a facility in Canada.
Precious metal investment alternatives include exchange traded funds (ETFs), certificates and trusts; for instance, iShares is listed on an exchange—you get a piece of paper saying you own the commodity, but you don’t have access to it. As my father mentioned, GoldMoney offers gold holdings, whereas Sprott Money allows you product choice and physical delivery of the gold and silver.
TGR: If you choose to have it delivered.
LS: I’d venture to say that 90% of our clients have their gold and silver delivered to them. They store it in a bank vault or at home—they have the peace of mind of knowing where it is. And 10% of our clients choose to store it in our depository.
TGR: And you’re thinking about adding a storage facility in Canada, so there would be a choice?
LS: There’s been huge demand from both Canadian and American clients to store in Canada. The impression I get is that they fear that what happened back in 1933, when the U.S. government seized the gold in people’s safe deposit boxes, could happen again. So, clients might feel safer or more confident storing in Canada.
TGR: Would an additional value to an American investor storing bullion in Canada be the ability to convert it into Canadian dollars?
LS: Yes, and that’s a good point. Anything we sell to clients, we will buy back.
ES: We can deal in either Canadian or U.S. currency.
TGR: At this point, are your customers Americans or Canadians primarily?
LS: About 70% Canadian, 30% American. That’s a good segue actually, because in the next six months, we’re going to open Sprott Money USA with an office in New York City to break into the U.S. market a bit more.
TGR: Regardless of where these metals are stored, the common view is to hold them in your portfolio as insurance against economic or currency crisis. Eric, you’ve recommended that Sprott clients hold 60%–70% of their net worth in precious metals, whether in vehicles such as Sprott Money or another. Because that proportion seems higher than what’s appropriate for insurance purposes, to what extent do you look at precious metals as investments versus insurance?
ES: It’s a bit of a semantic argument in a way, but I guess I would start with the view that I have a large distrust of the financial system. I really worry that we could have some kind of collapse. It sounds extreme to say, but we nearly had one in ‘08 and we nearly had one Europe last year. We still live in a very over-levered financial system. The banking issues just don’t seem to go away. We bail out Iceland or Ireland or Greece, and now we’ve got to bail out Egypt or Tunisia or wherever else is going to have some fiscal difficulties. Ultimately, I just don’t think there’s enough tangible support for these systems when people want to extricate themselves and take their money out of the banks.
Unfortunately, bankers can’t get rid of the asset on the other side of their balance sheet. So I think people will realize sooner or later that having their assets in physical metal is better than a bank deposit. I say that on a universal basis. To get back to whether it’s insurance or an investment, I certainly can look at it as insurance because it’s the one asset that should maintain its purchasing power. In some kind of financial collapse, all assets other than real assets will go down in value, so in that sense it’s insurance.
It’s also relatively proven to be an aggressive investment. Gold’s gone up for 11 years; I think it’s 17% a year and silver’s gone up even more. I think it’s all due to the debasement of the currencies and it’s relative to the currencies. So I think it’s both. I don’t have any trouble investing on behalf of our clients to the tune of 70% to 80% in precious metals. We’ve had a very high weighting in those areas for a long time. Of course, it has been the right place to be—and I think it will continue to be the right place to be.
TGR: The silver market is so small it lends itself to being held down artificially. What measures might free up the market movement?
ES: As you probably know, all sort of lawsuits accused HSBC and JP Morgan of manipulating the price of silver in 2008 when it went down. In that situation, quite frankly, I was the most surprised and disappointed person in the world to see that in the middle of a financial collapse, the price of silver—and even gold—didn’t rally. It seemed so unlikely that that should’ve happened. In my mind, that consequentially suggested forces might have been at work that weren’t normal in those markets. But the manipulation will end, if there was manipulation. I’ll explain why.
On commodity exchanges, the majority of transactions never settle in physical delivery. Just as an example, of the 800 million ounces (Moz.) of silver produced in a year, there are days when the commodities markets will trade 500 Moz. Well, obviously, nobody is settling this stuff because you can’t have an 800 Moz. annual market and trade 500 Moz./day. These are just people pressing buttons on computers—you know with their algorithms or whatever—but they’re not taking physical delivery. Manipulation takes place when a person who has more money than another person can drive the price of a product up or down, and it’s easy to manipulate a market wherein all you need is fiat currency.
Manipulation will end when enough people say, “You know what? I’ll take delivery of that product.” I think that’s what’s happening in silver. More and more people are taking delivery. The dealers who are short something like 400–500 Moz. have like 42 Moz. in storage. Our organization alone owns more than 42 million ounces. That’s not a lot of silver to cover a short bet of 400–500 million ounces. With every delivery period, those inventories keep going down. They’re going to go down to the point where everyone realizes there is no silver left. As a matter of fact, for all intents and purposes, I think there might be no silver available today, as some mints are no longer taking silver coin orders because they just can’t provide them. So, it’s obvious to me that this supposed silver inventory doesn’t exist anymore and that ends the manipulation.
LS: Speaking of inventories, I’d like to rewind a bit and make a point. There are so many competitors out there, but what sets Sprott Money apart from all of them is that our business model is a lot different in that we don’t sell what we don’t have in stock. I’ve heard stories from clients who say they’ve placed orders with our competitors and had to wait six months for delivery. Sprott Money has reserves and a lot in stock.
TGR: Currently, the aboveground silver remaining is somewhere around one billion ounces. At $35/oz., that’s $35 billion for the entire sector—and seven entities hold 50% of it at this time. That seems so concentrated that these entities could manipulate the price, as the Hunt Brothers did back in the ’70s.
ES: Most of those entities represent an agglomeration of individuals’ interests; for example, I don’t know how many accounts GoldMoney has, but it would all be in individual accounts. In the case of our Silver Trust, Sprott Physical Silver Trust (NYSE.A:PSLV), it’s whatever money we can raise from various sources that enable us to go and buy the 22 Moz. we bought. I don’t know how many shareholders it has, but it trades millions and millions and millions of shares a day. So, really none of these entities are organizations doing anything—they are groups of investors acting through various vehicles. I don’t think anybody’s tried to corner the market here.
TGR: So, we have far more investors in the silver sector than in previous decades.
ES: Absolutely. I think the phrase that probably captures silver’s behavior, to which it’s always been referred, is “poor man’s gold.” I think those who haven’t bought gold are, to some extent, seeking refuge in silver. But anybody who’s been a student of the silver market, as I myself might qualify, realizes we have a very tight situation here. And as this momentum builds to participate in the silver market, the shorts are just going to get overrun and the price could get excessively explosive.
TGR: Explosive silver prices could bode well for companies in that space, too. Could we segue to the participation in the silver market through equities, mining companies that have silver assets?
ES: We do own a lot of silver shares, as well as gold mining shares. We must own 40 or so different silver stocks. For the purpose of this discussion, I’ll focus in on bigger vehicles available to the public at large. They’re way more liquid and we don’t have a strategic position in them. Relative to gold, there aren’t a lot of silver vehicles, but we continue to like stocks, such as Silver Wheaton Corp. (NYSE:SLW; TSX:SLW), First Majestic Silver Corp. (TSX:FR; NYSE:AG; Fkft:FMV; OTCQX:FRMSF) and Hecla Mining Co. (NYSE:HL). On a little lesser scale, Bear Creek Mining Corp. (TSX.V:BCM) and on a really lesser scale is Aurcana Corporation (TSX.V:AUN). With some of the smaller companies, we have strategic positions like 10% or 20% and I don’t want to be pushing our own book here.
TGR: Most of the stocks you mentioned have assets located in either Mexico or Idaho—areas where Sprott portfolio managers seem comfortable in terms of the companies’ ability to continue growing and performing.
ES: There’s no doubt about a comfort level with operations in North or Central America, but we also have investments in Peru—where Bear Creek Mining is focused—and Argentina. We have no particular issues with those areas. The market, of course, always discounts whatever country it is—whether it be China, Russia, Kurdistan, the Congo or wherever—based on the political risk there. Typically, it’s built into the stock price and sometimes at a deeper discount than the situation warrants. As a result, some opportunities to make investments in places away from North and Central America can pay off.
TGR: Suppose an investor wants to take $100,000 from his nest egg and put it into precious metals because he’s nervous about currency markets. Would you recommend putting 70%–80% of that into bullion and the other 20%–25% in mining equities? Or, would you suggest diversifying outside of the precious metals arena?
ES: Just to clarify, I’m not recommending that people have 80% of their money in physical (though I can tell you I don’t see any problem with that). When I say we have 80% invested in PMs, the physical component is 30%–35% and the stock component 45%–50%. That’s the way we have played it.
As a portfolio manager, of course we want to get a little more action out of the shares than we can get out of precious metals because of the leverage factor. I’m personally invested at that rate, I invest for clients at that rate and I think it’s the wise thing to do. I’m not a great believer in diversification for the sake of diversification. Make a stand on what you believe is going to happen and participate in it. Just trust that you’re going to be right. If you’re going to be right, you’ll get an outsized return. So, that’s our call and we’re sticking with it. It’s proven very rewarding over the last decade. And of course, it’s been very rewarding to be in silver in this decade—it’s been phenomenal. Maybe I should’ve had 100% of my money in silver.
TGR: Given that silver’s the play of the decade, is your organization shifting from gold equities into silver equities more heavily?
ES: Since the end of ‘08, I’ve been selling gold bullion. Initially, it was to buy gold shares because the gold shares got absolutely massacred in ‘08. As the year wore on and into 2010, I got more and more fascinated by silver equities, so I’ve also been selling gold bullion to buy silver equities. I haven’t yet sold silver bullion to buy silver equities, which may be the next thing I do—again, because the equities are a little more levered. Obviously, silver on its own has had superior performance, particularly in the last nine months. It’s been a phenomenal performer. Mind you, the silver stocks have way outperformed it, so we’ll see going forward.
TGR: It’s great to understand your rationale. Thank both of you so much for your time and insights.
Eric Sprott is chairman of Sprott Inc., CEO, CIO and senior portfolio manager of Sprott Asset Management LP and chairman of Sprott Money Ltd. He has accumulated more than 40 years of experience in the investment industry. After earning his designation as a chartered accountant, he entered the investment industry as a research analyst at Merrill Lynch. In 1981, he founded Sprott Securities. After establishing Sprott Asset Management Inc. as a separate entity in December 2001, Eric divested his entire ownership of Sprott Securities to its employees. Eric has been stunningly accurate in his predictions, including foreseeing the current financial crisis. He chronicled the dangers of excessive leverage and the bubbles the Fed was creating, while correctly forecasting the tragic collapse of the housing and financial markets in 2008. Eric’s predictions on the state of the North American financial markets, as well as macroeconomic analysis have been presented in Markets at a Glance, a monthly investment strategy newsletter.
Larisa Sprott joined Sprott Money Ltd. in the role of president in December 2009. As one of Canada’s largest owners of gold and silver bullion, the company’s goal is to facilitate ownership of precious metals to the general public. Larisa has more than 15 years of experience in the financial industry, having worked at Sprott Securities Inc. (now Cormark Securities) first as an office administrator in the Vancouver office, followed by roles in both research and corporate finance at Toronto headquarters. Larisa then spent five years with Sprott Asset Management in the capacity of client services, sales and marketing. In November 2007, she became an investment advisor responsible for servicing and managing high net-worth clients.

By Christopher Briem, on March 14th, 2011
Hard to be the bearer of good news in this town. This is something just out and quite honestly I am surprised. If it holds up over next few months it is pretty big economic news.
You can check out the latest dump of total non-farm jobs for the region from the BLS here. I have done absolutely nothing other than calculate the year over year change over the last 3 years. What is interesting about the January data just released?
Like I said.. if it holds up. January is still a preliminary number, so something to keep an eye on.
Actually, let’s update that chart to see how far back you need to go. The answer is February 2001. More the evidence it must be an anomaly. Can’t be true right? Here is the longer term picture of same:
By Ajay Shah, on March 14th, 2011
If you are in India, and hear news about the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear reactors in Japan, you might want to trade on this. Either because you are hedging Japan exposure that’s embedded in your Indian equity holdings, or because you think you are an informed speculator who has a better and faster judgment about what these events mean for Japan.
Sadly, the Indian capital controls don’t let you trade on the Nikkei 225, which is the Nifty of Japan. But there is something you can do: Trade on the JPY/INR futures trading on NSE.
Quite a few people seem to have thought like this. Here’s a graph of the turnover:
Now let’s pause to think about the story playing out on this market. On one hand, it’s the purely domestic speculators or hedgers, who are buying and selling from each other. This is fine, but where are the linkages to the global financial system?
The most important arbitrage which should be at work is in the currency triplet INR/USD, USD/JPY and JPY/INR. But unfortunately, currency futures trading in India does not include the USD/JPY contract, so one crucial leg of the arbitrage is not readily available. With turnover like $100 million in a day, I’m sure some people are doing such arbitrage in some painful ways.


|
|
Most Popular Posts