This Century and the Last One: A Report Card for the First 10 Years

When we look back at the sweep of history, the 20th century stands out. It stands out as a time of immense progress in our knowledge, a time of great carnage, and the time when the great debate about socialism and the market economy ended. I think it was Arthur C. Clarke who said that one of two things will come next: either we will look back at the 20th century as the most amazing time when everything happened, or the pace of change will further accelerate thus making the 21st century even more incredible than the one that went by. (Does someone know the exact quote?).

Economists have been arguing that the creation of knowledge responds to the inputs going into it. And there is no question that the number of people engaged in knowledge professions today is greater than ever before in human history. Information technology has added strength to this pursuit, amplifying what a puny unaided human mind could do on its own. Earlier, the West dominated the production of knowledge; now we have phenomena like R&D labs in India giving a new kind of low cost production of knowledge, and increased opportunities for risk-taking in research. These factors should increase the pace of progress of creating knowledge. It should take us closer to the scenario where the 21st century will be even more exciting than its predecessor in terms of creating new knowledge.

I find myself nervously looking around, in 2010, and wondering if we are actually doing that much better.

From 1900 to 1910, here are a few of the great things that happened:

  • In 1900, Max Planck proposed quantum theory, Hilbert posed his 23 problems, and Louis Bachelier was the first researcher in finance.
  • In 1901, Marconi did the first wireless trans-atlantic transmission.
  • In 1902, the first car ride from San Francisco to New York took place, and the Wright brothers flew the first plane.
  • In 1903, construction of the Panama canal began.
  • In 1905, Einstein wrote four papers.
  • In 1906, Mahatma Gandhi coined the phrase satyagraha, and the first `vitamins’ were discovered.
  • In 1908, the first oil was extracted from the Middle East, and Henry Ford sold the first Model T.

I’m sure there were many interesting things going on, but these were the big things of that period that meant a lot to me. When I look back at 2000 to 2010 and … what cool things can we remember which would change the world?

Or is that all sorts of wonderful things have been going on and it is my lack of knowledge? E.g. if I had lived in 1905, I might not have heard about Einstein’s four papers.

If it’s not just me, and the pace of progress has slackened: Why did we not get amazing progress from 2000 to 2010, despite the expansion of inputs into the systematic quest for new knowledge? Are we hitting diminishing returns; are we in the sad stage of adding decimal places to fundamental constants? Is our production function faulty?

CFTC Gold And Silver Hearing Is Old News

Starting 25 March 2010 the CFTC has been conducting an investigation into the concentrated short positions in the gold and silver markets. There has been some very interesting testimony come out of the Goldman Sachs vampire squid’s mouths that the informed gold bugs already knew. The size and scope of this Ponzi scam is beginning to be comprehended. As the idea spreads the demand for various types of ‘physical gold’ will increase and decrease.


On 9 September 2008 I appeared on Adam Curry’s Daily Source Code in episode 788, which has hundreds of thousands of subscribers and has recently been reactivated, I casually remarked, “There are about 140 ounces of paper gold for every one ounce of physical gold.”

Jeffrey Christian, formerly of Goldman Sachs and currently of CPM Group, considers himself among the world’s foremost experts on gold. Before the CFTC Christian testified:

One of the things that the people who criticize the bullion banks and talk about this undue large position don’t understand what is the nature of the long positions of the physical market and we don’t help it; the CFTC when it did its most recent report on silver used the term that we use “the physical market”. We use that term as did the CFTC in that report to talk about the OTC market in other words forwards, OTC options, physical metal and everything else. People say, and you heard it today, there is not that much physical metal out there, and there isn’t. But in the “physical market” as the market uses that term, there is much more metal than that there is a hundred times what there is.


Let’s untangle some of Christian’s weak verbal jiu-jitsu. In my book The Great Credit Contraction I start off the first paragraph of the first chapter with definitions because if there is no agreement on definitions then it is impossible to analyze and conclude properly. While I focus on the terms money, money substitutes, illusions and currency we may want to shift our focus and attention towards the bottom of the liquidity pyramid and the terms ‘gold’ and ’silver’.

Physical gold, AU 79 on the periodic table, has a density of 19.30 grams per cubic centimeter at room temprature and a liquid density at the melting point of 1,947.5°F of 17.31 grams per cubic centimeter. Physical silver has a similar definition.

Physical Fake Tungsten Gold has been demonstrated to exist and is differentiated from physical gold because of its tungsten composition.

GLD ETF gold differs from physical gold in many ways which I have examined several times. On page 11 of the prospectus it states:

Neither the Trustee nor the Custodian independently confirms the fineness of the gold allocated to the Trust in connection wtih the creation of a Basket [issuances].

So for that reason and many others, in A Problem With GLD And SLV ETFs I concluded, “There is no assurance that the ‘gold’ held in the ETFs is actually the same gold as defined under the periodic table.”

I casted even more aspersions on these instruments in Another Problem With The GLD ETF where I showed from the 21st of November 10-K:

“Gold held by the Custodian’s currently selected subcustodians and by subcustodians of sub-custodians may be held in vaults located in England or in other locations.” and “In addition, the Trustee has no right to visit the premises of any subcustodian for the purposes of examining the Trust’s gold or any records maintained by the sub-custodian for the purposes of examining the Trust’s gold or any records maintained by the sub-custodian, and no sub-custodian is obligated to cooperate in any review the Trustee may wish to conduct of the facilities, procedures, records or creditworthiness of such sub-custodian.”

Physical London LBMA OTC Forward gold is another interesting form of Christian’s physical gold. But I touched on the Massive Institutional Gold Market Change over six months ago.


Here are two key excerpts from the CFTC gold and silver hearings on 25-26 March 2010.

And the clip with Christian’s failed verbal jiu-jitsu which is actually a blatant admission (at 3:48) of the Ponzi scam nature of the ‘physical gold market’.

So what has Christian attempted to do? Conflate the gold as defined in the periodic table with other forms of ‘gold’ such as GLD ETF gold, London LBMA OTC gold, Comex futures gold, etc. under the term ‘physical gold market’. Of course, such contorted logic is absurd. The ability of a piece of paper with the letters ‘G-O-L-D’ written on it, that can become worthless, is no more efficacious at providing protection of value than a piece of cardboard with ‘C-O-W’ written on it is efficacious at providing a gallon of milk.


The knowledge that there are at least a hundred pieces of paper masquerading as physical gold in the physical gold market for every ounce of gold as defined on the periodic table is old news. What is breaking news is that one of the vampire squids would testify before government officials that this is the case.

So, if possession is 9/10ths of the law and if there are 100+ claims on an ounce of gold for every actual physical ounce and if there is a demand by the market for those actual physical ounces, because The Great Credit Contraction continues and capital seeks safety and liquidity by moving down the liquidity pyramid, then what happens to the value of the gold ounce in one’s hand or trust third-party service? For comparison there is about $7,000,000 of capital, real and fictional, for each ounce of physical gold.

Of course, Christian would probably argue it is illogical and irrational to contemplate such events unfolding. But they already have. David Einhorn moved billions from the GLD ETF into physical gold in his own warehouse.

DISCLOSURES: Long physical gold, silver and platinum with no interest in the problematic SLV, Streettracks Gold ETF Trust Shares or the platinum ETFs.

Economic Events on March 30, 2010

The weekly ICSC-Goldman Store Sales report will be released at 7:45 AM EDT, and another strong week of sales is expected.

The monthly S&P/Case-Shiller home price index report will be released at 9:00 AM EDT.  Given that most economists don’t expect the overall U.S. economy to improve until housing prices end their decline, the market will be watching this number closely.

The monthly report on Consumer Confidence will be released at 10:00 AM EDT.  The consensus index level is 50.0, which would be a slight increase over February, but is still below the level reported in January.

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts