Gold And The Oil Majors Revisited

The ‘gold bugs’ assert that at all times and in all circumstances gold remains money.  For some irrational reason the ‘paper bugs’ cling to their increasingly worthless colored coupons asserting their importance as currency.

The Great Credit Contraction has begun and in the macro sense there is no practical solution to the end of the current worldwide monetary system.  But in the micro sense the individuals and companies that will survive, thrive and prosper will be those that are liquid.  It will be those who can make payroll.

GOLD IS MONEY AND CURRENCY

On May 20, 1999, Alan Greenspan testified before Congress, “Gold is always accepted and is the ultimate means of payment and is perceived to be an element of stability in the currency and in the ultimate value of the currency and that historically has always been the reason why governments hold gold.”

For these reasons gold, silver and platinum belong in the cash portion of the balance sheet.  The precious metals are the ultimate form of currency.  Unlike their comptition, the colored coupons, the precious metals can never become worthless, are always accepted and are the ultimate means of payment.

The ‘gold bugs’ will always be able to purchase something while the ‘paper bugs’, if they have physical notes and not mere digits in a database, are eventually left with an instrument that only has a single use after defecation.  What intrinsic value!

GOLD ANTI-TRUST ACTION COMMITTEE

During the 1990’s Mr. Rubin had devised the gold leasing scheme with the intent being elucidated by Dr. Greenspan’s testimony in 1998, “Nor can private counterparties restrict supplies of gold, another commodity whose derivatives are often traded over-the-counter, where central banks stand ready to lease gold in increasing quantities should the price rise.”

GATA’s alleged central bank gold price suppression scheme may include the COMEX’s participation.  Mr. Robert Landis, a graduate of Princeton University, Harvard Law School and member of the New York Bar, has asserted that “Any rational person who continues to dispute the existence of the rig after exposure to the evidence is either in denial or is complicit.”

GATA alleges that the central banks have less than half the physical gold claimed.  The central banks carry gold in the vault and gold out on loan as the same line item.  In effect, they report cash and accounts receivables as the same thing.  Ever tried making payroll with an accounts receivable?

INDIA’S PURCHASE

It seems some countries are getting a little nervous and demanding their phsyical gold.  For example, the IMF by-law F-1 states, “Gold depositories of the Fund shall be established in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and India.”

With the lack of transparency it makes one wonder whether India’s recent ‘purchase’ of 200 tons of gold from the International Monetary Fund was a bona-fide purchase or the taking of physical possession of ‘paper gold’ they had previously purchase on the open market and whether this was done of the IMF’s free-will or through coercion because of the ancient rule that possession is 9/10th’s of the law?  Perhaps this is why India, not China, got to purchase this large block of bullion.

But such is just speculation, like the tungsten rumors, based on circumstantial research and there are no real credible and verifiable sources that I have been able to find but it does highlight the issue:  actual physical gold is tremendously limited relative to the amount of colored coupons.

ADVICE TO THE OIL MAJORS

Nearly a year ago on 16 December 2008 in Oil Majors Should Just Buy Real Gold I wrote:

Combined these five companies [Exxon (XOM), Chevron (CVX), Total (TOT), British Petroleum (BP), Conoco Phillips (COP)] had current assets exceeding $300B. … The entire eligible COMEX stockpile represents an immaterial 0.36% of the current assets of the five oil majors.  The oil majors could drain the COMEX with a rounding error.  It would be 14% of what Exxon Mobil was spending per quarter buying back stock.  Why buy back stock when oil is so cheap compared to gold?  Why not just buy physical gold and truck it away?

What has happened since then?

At the end of Q3 2009 Exxon (XOM) had $57.3B of current assets; Chevron (CVX) had $35.5B in current assets with $7.6B cash on hand; Total (TOT) had $48.4B in current assets and $13.8B cash on hand; British Petroleum (BP) had $66.7B in current assets and the runt,ConocoPhillips (COP), still possessed $22.3B in current assets.  Combined these five companies had current assets exceeding $250B and cash on hand exceeding $50B.

While the risk of a potential COMEX failure to deliver gold is a possibility for brevity I will not explain the mechanics nor current state of the warehouse.

The approximate two million ounces of registered gold in the COMEX inventory represents about 62 metric tons or a mere $2.3B.  For compaision, Bloomberg reported on 17 November 2009 that The Bank of Mauritius bought 2 metric tons for about $71.7 million.  Mauritius had a 2008 GDP of $8.65B or about .5% of the 2008 total revenue of the five oil majors.

On my article ‘How the Treasury Bubble Will Burst and Why‘ at Seeking Alpha I received a comment from Alan Brochstein, CFA and fellow Seeking Alpha Gold Standard Contributor who provides analytical services for hire. He said, “Trace, sorry, but this makes absolutely no sense…” This is not surprising considering his 8 Dec 2008 article ‘Own Gold? Time to Fold‘ where he stated, “Gold remains a sucker’s bet…”

On 8 December 2008 gold closed at $772.25 and by 27 November 2009 gold closed at $1,177, a 52.4% gain.  Not bad for a different currency; it makes one consider whether the FRN$ is in hyperinflation.

PLATINUM AND SILVER

Platinum, a tangible asset, is incredibly safe and has now, with GoldMoney, gotten more liquid.  There is a miniscule amount of platinum compared to the illusions in the liquidity pyramid.  For example, the entire annual worldwide platinum production is valued at about $8B compared to the five oil major’s $50B of cash.

While no one really knows what the total above ground silver stock is; Ted Butler, a noted silver analyst, suggests there are about one billion ounces which is about $20B.

SHARE REPURCHASES

In 2008 the five oil majors repurchased about $54.2B of stock.  Exxon with $35.4B, Chevron with $6.8B, Total with $1.3B, British Petroleum with $2.6 and Conoco Phillips with $8.1B.  The average price of gold in 2009 through October was about $941.

So let me get this right. Instead of holding increasingly worthless colored coupons the oil majors could have diversified their currency holdings to ensure they could make payroll and with about a third of what was spent on the share repurchases could have bought the entire annual production of platinum and the entire above ground stockpile of silver.  Or assuming the average price of gold they could have bought about 1,791 metric tons of gold.

The 1,791 metric tons of gold would make the five oil majors the fifth largest holder behind the United States, Germany, the IMF and France, but who knows how much physical gold the Western central banks really have, and have about twice the 1,054 tons of the sixth place China.

At the current price of gold the $54.2B of stock repurchases from five measly companies will only yield about 1,432 metric tons of gold or about 359 less tons than the hypothetical.  For comparison Venezuela is the 16th largest holder with 363.9 tons and the United Kingdom is the 17th largest holder with 310.3 tons.

This is one reason the ‘new gold monetarists’ should be taken seriously.  Even on CNBC, a starving vampire squid (Neilsen ratings are down 52% year over year) which hates gold like werewolves hate silver, had a serious discussion about the ‘new gold monetarists‘ which included the quote, “That is what the new gold monetarists are saying.  If you take all the world’s GDP and divide it by the amount of gold that is above ground that is available then you get a price that is somewhere between $11,000 per ounce and all the way up to $50,000.”

CONCLUSION

Too many people have too much faith in worthless irredeemable colored coupons and their companion digital counterparts.  The Federal Reserve and other central banks are failing with quantitative easing.  And after all, the worldwide monetary system is just a confidence game and when confidence is lost it does not so much collapse as evaporate.  For example, auction rate securities, mortgage backed securities, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, AIG, the Kazakhstan tenge, the drooping Vietnam dong, the British Pound or the FRN$ (more than 50% loss in a year is pretty bad!).

The current worldwide monetary system is failing.  Why will another fiat system not replace it?  The market will not permit such irrational behavior.  The monetary authorities are on the defensive. They have lost the confidence of the market and are unable to regain it with more secrecy, more bailouts and more of the same.  The market is forcing them to do what everyone in the past has had to do.  They are being forced to show the market the money.  Real money and not some colored coupon currency.  Money that is a real and tangible asset that can be put in someone’s hand or trucked away to a different vault.

Sure, what the new gold monetarists say seems incredible and may lead some financial professionals to declare ‘this makes absolutely no sense’.  But this population of financial professionals has been systematically miseducated to despise precious metals and be ‘paper bugs’.  But as confidence continues evaporating those same professionals will demand that precious metals return to the center of financial life.  On the macro scene society will learn some very real and very hard lessons.  But on the micro scene there are tremendous opportunities to benefiit from the largest transfer of wealth the world has ever experienced.

The future is clear.  Gold will return to its historic role as the center of gravity for the Western and worldwide monetary system.  Sure, the Establishment, costumed officials and financial professionals do not welcome the change.  But it is not their choice because the market will force their hand and the market is more powerful than all of them combined.

After all, it will be the companies and governments with the monetary metals in the cash portion of their balance sheet that will be able to make payroll and those without will simply evaporate.  The number one killer of businesses is cash-flow.  Remember the first rule of panic:  do it first!

DISCLOSURES: Long physical physical goldsilverplatinum and no position the problematic SLV or GLD ETFs or XOM, CVX, TOT, BP or COP.

Went to a Garden Tea Party …

I dropped in on the St. Louis Tea Party event Saturday at Kiener Plaza in St. Louis. Typical sub-par cell phone photo with special glare augmentation A crowd photo by Julie Stone:

My guesstimate — and I’m not great at these things, so I could be way off — is 1,000-1,500 people attending the event. Far fewer than the Tax Day Tea Party in April, but still a helluva turnout for a political event, especially on a holiday weekend.

I was joined by Libertarian congressional candidates (both announced for 1st District, so we’ll be having a contested primary!) Robb Cunningham and Julie Stone. We passed out a stack of Missouri Libertarian Party newspapers. Here’s a photo of Julie handing one of the papers to a guy:

The bad news:

In St. Louis, at least, the organizational end of the Tea Party movement (founded by Illinois Libertarian Party activists) has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Republican Party. Local Tea Party coordinator Bill Hennessy has stated his case for “taking over the GOP” instead of going third party, and his suggested tactics for getting the rogue Tea Partiers back into Republican lockstep.

Several of the speakers regurgitated the same talking point (quoted from memory): “It’s not about Republican or Democrat, it’s about conservative or liberal.” Of course, by “conservative” they meant “Republicans and a few pet Democrats who can be counted on to vote for the most expensive and damaging big-government program, foreign military adventurism.”

All of the introduced/touted candidates were Republicans, all of the targeted public officials were Democrats. The issues talking points were 100% conservative/Republican red meat (ObamaCare, Cap-and-Trade, the evil unions). Obviously those issues get some overlap with the sentiments of libertarians, constitutionalists and other pro-freedom folks, but absent was anything that didn’t pass the Rush Limbaugh “dittohead” orgasm test.

Even though the St. Louis County Libertarians contributed $100 for the event (to help with the rental of “port-a-potties” — and we took the liberty of posting a sponsorship flier on one), we received zero mention from the stage during the two hours that I was there. Nor did any other third party or independent candidate.

In format and agenda, it was 100% a Republican Party event.

The “leadership” and the “membership” are two different things, of course. We got a reasonably warm greeting for our literature, and several people made it a point to photograph, or come up to discuss (always positively), my sign: “Voting Republican for smaller government is like f–king for virginity.”

I suspect that the Tea Party movement is done as a force for liberty. That’s certainly the case to the extent that its “leaders” succeed in duping supporters of smaller government into voting Republican next year. My impression, though, is that most of the Tea Partiers fall into one of two groups: Those who were already Republicans and who just might have caught on a bit through their exposure to the LP, Campaign For Liberty, etc., and those who were already third party and don’t plan to allow themselves to be co-opted.

So, a lot of sadly blown potential, but probably not too much damage done, and perhaps even a little bit of good accomplished. Requiescat in pace for something that might have been an amazing breakthrough if the damn Republicans hadn’t tied it down, slit its throat and sucked the blood out of it.

—-
More photos at Facebook, courtesy of Julie Stone.

Dubai’s Great Crash

Sheikh Makhtoum won’t go to debtor’s prison, but short of that, Dubai’s all-but-sovereign default is an epochal event in its story. I wrote a column in Financial Express titled Dubai’s great crash where I draw on this episode to think more clearly about (a) International financial centres and (b) Puffery. On this subject, also see Reality catches up with the Gulf’s model global city by Roula Khalaf in the Financial Times, and ‘The Sheikh’s New Clothes?’ Dubai’s Desert Dream Ends by Stanley Reed in Business Week.

One hears talk about Dubai giving up crown jewels, like the airline, in exchange for a bailout. I think the time for that bailout was six months ago. Today, with a funding gap of $80 billion, the crown jewels are not big enough. But six months ago, it was possible to think of a deal where ADIA bought up the crown jewels for (say) $40 billion and Dubai would have tided over the storm. Or maybe this is big, and runs beyond just the crown jewels: see Enough glitzy debt: time for regime change by Jo Tatchell in The Times.

This episode is an opportunity to think about exchange rate regimes. What if Dubai had used a floating rate instead of a fixed rate? This would have worked in two ways. First, it would have been a stabiliser. When bad times came, capital would have started leaving Dubai, the exchange rate would have depreciated, thus making real estate or hotel rooms in Dubai cheaper in the eyes of foreign customers. (Conversely, in good times, the exchange rate would have appreciated, thus reducing the attraction of going to Dubai). The key intuition (RBI speechwriters please note) is that exchange rate fluctuations stabilise the economy. Without a flexible exchange rate, adjustment in Dubai was forced on to the labour market, the real estate market, etc., which are all places where adjustment is more disruptive and is resisted more.

The second interesting feature of this thought experiment is linked to borrowing. A fixed exchange rate encourages and even subsidises dollar denominated borrowing. For society, the low cost of borrowing (the USD interest rate) is paid for by the loss of monetary policy autonomy. If a flexible exchange rate were used. Mr. Makhtoum would have been more careful and would have borrowed less.

Holiday Retail: “Very Good Signs”

Retail executives were holding their breath on Friday, looking for indications that the recent recovery would extend into the holiday shopping season. Macy’s CEO Terry Lundgren went on the record with the Wall Street Journal Saturday to assert that early indications of both traffic and sales are pointing to “very good signs” for the December shopping season.

Online market reports from Coremetrics showed the average amount online shoppers spent on Friday rose 35% from last year’s Black Spending Friday. Top statistics included:

- Online Apparel retailers saw sales jump 28.6% from last year.
- Web-based jewelry sales reported nearly 25 percent surge.
- Online department stores did phenomenally well job reporting a 151.7 percent jump.

Overall consumer electronics are taking an early lead in sales volumes. Best Buy CEO Brian Dunn said that shoppers are in “a buying mood” and that “our crowds were materially bigger than last year.”

Toys “R” Us also pointed to big crowds favoring electronics. CEO Jerry Storch said that not only are electronics a big hit but with respect to early sales results: “So far we’re pleased. Friday morning we averaged over 1,000 people per store waiting in line, and we’ve been doing brisk business ever since.”

In general Friday’s results appear to be positive for holiday retailers. Given the big online surge on Friday that continued into Saturday, Cyber Monday is likely to follow suit. University of San Diego economics professor Alan Gin remarked over the weekend, “I think things will be surprisingly on the up side.”