<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Modest Proposal for a Move to the Left</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/10/22/a-modest-proposal-for-a-move-to-the-left/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/10/22/a-modest-proposal-for-a-move-to-the-left/</link>
	<description>Citizen Economists is an online economics magazine written by citizen journalists. These ordinary citizens provide reports and commentary on the current events affecting the economics of the fields they work in.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:10:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Bridgman</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/10/22/a-modest-proposal-for-a-move-to-the-left/comment-page-1/#comment-21673</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Bridgman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=2196#comment-21673</guid>
		<description>As you know, the top point of any Laffer curve is its maximum, not its optimal.

Actual (estimates of) Laffer curves are not symmetric; the maximum is not generally at 50%

Cutting a tax by increasing exemptions will likely make the tax more progressive. Progressive implies inefficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you know, the top point of any Laffer curve is its maximum, not its optimal.</p>
<p>Actual (estimates of) Laffer curves are not symmetric; the maximum is not generally at 50%</p>
<p>Cutting a tax by increasing exemptions will likely make the tax more progressive. Progressive implies inefficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan McLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/10/22/a-modest-proposal-for-a-move-to-the-left/comment-page-1/#comment-21666</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan McLaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=2196#comment-21666</guid>
		<description>Hi Seth,

The problem is not corporations themselves, but a government that has gotten so big the rewards to corruption are vast.  Even a tiny slice of the pie is a pretty big take.

I have to agre with you that the estate tax is a good target, but it will never be big enough to make a real dent n government.  It will also never have enough support to eliminate it.d

Tax rates are one of the keys to making America competitive again.  We have some of the highest business taxes among developed countries.  I agree with you that tax rates must be cut enough to reduce government revenues and choke the beast to get it under control.  Government is strangling us as we watch it grow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Seth,</p>
<p>The problem is not corporations themselves, but a government that has gotten so big the rewards to corruption are vast.  Even a tiny slice of the pie is a pretty big take.</p>
<p>I have to agre with you that the estate tax is a good target, but it will never be big enough to make a real dent n government.  It will also never have enough support to eliminate it.d</p>
<p>Tax rates are one of the keys to making America competitive again.  We have some of the highest business taxes among developed countries.  I agree with you that tax rates must be cut enough to reduce government revenues and choke the beast to get it under control.  Government is strangling us as we watch it grow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/10/22/a-modest-proposal-for-a-move-to-the-left/comment-page-1/#comment-21650</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=2196#comment-21650</guid>
		<description>Sorry. I should have pointed out that life insurance companies are the estate taxes&#039; biggest proponents. Warren Buffett (insurance mogul) loves it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. I should have pointed out that life insurance companies are the estate taxes&#8217; biggest proponents. Warren Buffett (insurance mogul) loves it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/10/22/a-modest-proposal-for-a-move-to-the-left/comment-page-1/#comment-21649</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=2196#comment-21649</guid>
		<description>I understand the mischief that governments get into, but I&#039;m not really sure whether large corporations or the government are the bigger problem.

With the estate tax, you have a situation where the life insurance lobby is spending millions of dollars a year and making billions from &quot;second-to-die&quot; insurance premiums on policies sold to small business owners. 

It seems almost like a chicken and egg scenario. Did great wealth beget an enlarged government or did an enlarged government help their &quot;friends&quot; garner great wealth?

I think, either way, the answer is to cut taxes--starting with the estate tax.  It&#039;s nothing but corporate welfare for life insurance companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the mischief that governments get into, but I&#8217;m not really sure whether large corporations or the government are the bigger problem.</p>
<p>With the estate tax, you have a situation where the life insurance lobby is spending millions of dollars a year and making billions from &#8220;second-to-die&#8221; insurance premiums on policies sold to small business owners. </p>
<p>It seems almost like a chicken and egg scenario. Did great wealth beget an enlarged government or did an enlarged government help their &#8220;friends&#8221; garner great wealth?</p>
<p>I think, either way, the answer is to cut taxes&#8211;starting with the estate tax.  It&#8217;s nothing but corporate welfare for life insurance companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
