<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Technological &#8220;Dark Age&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/12/09/the-technological-dark-age/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/12/09/the-technological-dark-age/</link>
	<description>Citizen Economists is an online economics magazine written by citizen journalists. These ordinary citizens provide reports and commentary on the current events affecting the economics of the fields they work in.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:44:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan McLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/12/09/the-technological-dark-age/comment-page-1/#comment-3814</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan McLaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 21:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=404#comment-3814</guid>
		<description>A point that you are missing is that the Boeing 747 didn&#039;t just fly out of the forehead of the Wright Brothers.  For a long period of time before their first successful attempt, their had been a heated race to get there first.  The Wright Brothers get the accolades for being the first powered flight, but they didn&#039;t win the race by much.  

Modern airlines resulted from a long string of innovations and inventions, just as any major industry did.  Even &quot;the light bulb&quot; is very different from that which Edison developed.  Others improved on it.

Cell phones are a very successful compeitor to AT&amp;T.  Cell phone are even competitors to Palm Pilots, email, and movie theaters.

As long as there are markets and competition, there will be innovation.  There is always competition for ideas.  Those ideas are based on the ideas of others.  Companies that don&#039;t embrace change are those that end up in the corporate graveyards.

The only way innovation will die away is if all countries suppress markets  Barring that, those nations that suppress economic freedom the least will be the ones that prosper and spur inventors to build a better mouse trap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A point that you are missing is that the Boeing 747 didn&#8217;t just fly out of the forehead of the Wright Brothers.  For a long period of time before their first successful attempt, their had been a heated race to get there first.  The Wright Brothers get the accolades for being the first powered flight, but they didn&#8217;t win the race by much.  </p>
<p>Modern airlines resulted from a long string of innovations and inventions, just as any major industry did.  Even &#8220;the light bulb&#8221; is very different from that which Edison developed.  Others improved on it.</p>
<p>Cell phones are a very successful compeitor to AT&amp;T.  Cell phone are even competitors to Palm Pilots, email, and movie theaters.</p>
<p>As long as there are markets and competition, there will be innovation.  There is always competition for ideas.  Those ideas are based on the ideas of others.  Companies that don&#8217;t embrace change are those that end up in the corporate graveyards.</p>
<p>The only way innovation will die away is if all countries suppress markets  Barring that, those nations that suppress economic freedom the least will be the ones that prosper and spur inventors to build a better mouse trap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan W</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/12/09/the-technological-dark-age/comment-page-1/#comment-3808</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=404#comment-3808</guid>
		<description>This post is so flawed I don&#039;t know where to begin. 

Has Microsoft managed to throttle google? No.

How many of the blue chip companies that comprised the S&amp;P500 index 50 years ago still exist? Probably less than 50%.

Is the internet censored in western nations, apart from kiddie porn and terrorist sites? No.

Can the powers that be prevent the truth about the exploitative nature of our monetary system leaking out to wider and wider audiences? They can try but ultimately they will fail.

Technological innovation has never ceased in human history and there is no reason for it to do so now. 

Doom and gloom about our economic future is well justified but to try and pile on nonsense about deliberately supressed technological innovation is not. It will be new technology of one form or another that pulls us out of the coming slump.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is so flawed I don&#8217;t know where to begin. </p>
<p>Has Microsoft managed to throttle google? No.</p>
<p>How many of the blue chip companies that comprised the S&amp;P500 index 50 years ago still exist? Probably less than 50%.</p>
<p>Is the internet censored in western nations, apart from kiddie porn and terrorist sites? No.</p>
<p>Can the powers that be prevent the truth about the exploitative nature of our monetary system leaking out to wider and wider audiences? They can try but ultimately they will fail.</p>
<p>Technological innovation has never ceased in human history and there is no reason for it to do so now. </p>
<p>Doom and gloom about our economic future is well justified but to try and pile on nonsense about deliberately supressed technological innovation is not. It will be new technology of one form or another that pulls us out of the coming slump.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

