The U.S. Economy in Recession: A Look at the Numbers

Earlier this year it seemed the United States would skirt recession or at worst find a shallow bottom and recover handily in the early part of 2009. However, there’s been a dramatic shift in circumstances in the intervening months, and this is no longer a matter of skinny dipping. After the impact of the credit crunch on the “real” economy, the U.S. is heading for a chunky dunk, similar to the 1981–82 recession and bypassing the lesser ones in between.

The classical definition of a recession is two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth (an economy that is shrinking rather than expanding). Going by this definition, New Zealand was the first developed nation to qualify. The Eurozone and the United Kingdom are halfway there, while Canada, for the most part still going strong, is nevertheless flirting with recession due to its deeply intertwined trade relationship with the U.S.

The major scorecard between all national economies remains the gross domestic product, or GDP, which is the measure of all goods and services produced within each country. In the first quarter of this year, the U.S. GDP printed at 0.9%, meaning that the economy as a whole was that percentage larger in the first quarter of 2008 than it was in the fourth quarter of 2007. In the second quarter, it rose to an astonishing 2.8%—but it’s important to understand that most of that expansion was the direct result of heavy exports, as America’s trading partners around the world had not yet come under the influence of our financial woes.

GDP in 2008

Only in the third quarter of this year has U.S. GDP fallen into negative territory. The first estimate, released last week, printed at 0.3%, which actually wasn’t as bad as most economists expected. However, going by the classical definition of a recession, we’re halfway there and nobody looking at the current situation doubts that we’ll take the next step in the fourth quarter. Just for the record, it’s also expected the first quarter of 2009 will continue this contractionary trend.

The underlying fundamental data to this negative GDP growth include industrial production, which rolled off a cliff in the third quarter as several hurricanes, a strike at Boeing and especially the credit crunch hit. With major corporations around the nation denied access to credit, not only from banks but also from the commercial paper market, plans for corporate expansion evaporated. No new divisions were opened, no new jobs created and no new output processed. Instead, corporations which were actively losing wealth through stock market fluctuations had no alternative but to retrench, cutting some of their established jobs and slicing their output to prevent being stuck with large amounts of inventory that no one wanted to buy.

The Purchasing Manger’s Index

A forward-looking indicator, the Purchasing Managers’ Index, or PMI, surveys the people who purchase wholesale inputs for corporations to measure what and how much they’re buying. This gives an indication, not of where U.S. companies have been, but of where they intend to go, which gives economists an idea of national economic health in the near future. In September, the latest month for which data is available, the manufacturing PMI also fell off that economic cliff, printing at 43.5 with 50 marking the break-even point and 49.9 being the level for August. That’s the lowest PMI since 2001—the last U.S. recession.

All of this shrinking corporate activity will, of course, lead to higher unemployment as jobs are cut and few new positions are created. As families also retrench, more people will need jobs, thus swelling the ranks of job-market participants and therefore the unemployment rate. Currently that stands at 6.1%, 1.4% higher and with 2.2 million more people out of work than this time last year.

The circle of economic stagnation is completed as lower personal income leads to lower consumption, with businesses selling less and earning lower profits as individuals purchase less to make what funds they have go further. The only potentially bright spot in this gloomy picture is that lower demand generally leads to lower inflation, although as our current spate of higher prices is linked to higher commodities rather than surging demand, that is not a given. If commodities prices, particularly crude oil, rise again, then inflation could remain high, as well.

Coming in 2010: New IRS Rules to Fight Tax Evasion

Many wealthy Americans have been using offshore services provided by foreign banks to evade tax. Things may now get a little difficult.

Until now foreign banks could funnel hundreds of billions of dollars overseas on behalf of American clients without disclosing their names to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) under a program known as qualified intermediary. The banks would withhold any taxes due on United States securities in their accounts and send that money to the I.R.S. The program was established 2001 in an attempt to attract foreign investors to U.S. securities. More than 7000 foreign banks participate in the program.

Concerned that it has delegated too much control and authority to the banks and that in recent years American investors have been evading taxes by hiding behind offshore shell companies and trusts set up by the banks, the IRS has issued new rules which will go into effect in 2010. The new rules require the banks participating in the program to actively determine whether U.S. investors are behind the foreign accounts they set up. The banks will have to alert the IRS to any potential fraud that they detect, whether through their own internal controls, complaints from employees or investigations by regulators.

The new rule could be an outcome of the federal investigation of the Swiss banking giant UBS. Federal prosecutors claim that UBS misused the program by selling American clients offshore banking services that went undeclared to the IRS, helping its American clients hide as much as $20 billion in assets offshore, thereby evading at least $300 million in taxes.

The changes to the program means the IRS will now audit small samples of individual bank accounts in the program, without knowing the clients’ names, to determine whether U.S. investors actually have control over foreign entities set up by the banks. Participating banks must now hire external auditors who will have to zero in on the bank employees responsible for identifying and preventing abuse of the program. The external auditor must report all red flags to the IRS. In addition, banks using foreign-based external auditors will have to work with an American auditor.

That’s not all. There is more bad news for those looking at foreign banks to evade taxes. The US has succeeded in getting the Swiss tax authorities to hand over confidential data on wealthy American clients of UBS. Under Swiss law, it is a crime to disclose client name or data unless the Swiss authorities think that the client has committed a serious offense like money laundering or tax fraud. Tax evasion is not considered a crime in Switzerland. This is a major shift in the Swiss banking secrecy laws. The US could now use this as a precedent in the future to get more Swiss banks to disclose the details of their American clients.

The message is loud and clear – Uncle Sam will take his rightful share of your money no matter where you hide it.