<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Health Insurance Companies Take Advantage of Doctors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/22/health-insurance-companies-take-advantage-of-doctors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/22/health-insurance-companies-take-advantage-of-doctors/</link>
	<description>Citizen Economists is an online economics magazine written by citizen journalists. These ordinary citizens provide reports and commentary on the current events affecting the economics of the fields they work in.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:03:49 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Citizen Economists &#187; Reforming Healthcare &#38; Taking On Big Pharma: An E-Interview &#38; Reader Q&#38;A with S.J. Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/22/health-insurance-companies-take-advantage-of-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-2049</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen Economists &#187; Reforming Healthcare &#38; Taking On Big Pharma: An E-Interview &#38; Reader Q&#38;A with S.J. Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amateureconomists.com/blogs/?p=298#comment-2049</guid>
		<description>[...] class-action lawsuits by providers against insurance companies are a good solution to balance the inequity of power insurance companies wield in the current healthcare climate? Or does this merely clog the judicial system and become a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] class-action lawsuits by providers against insurance companies are a good solution to balance the inequity of power insurance companies wield in the current healthcare climate? Or does this merely clog the judicial system and become a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amateur Economists &#187; Health Insurance Companies Take Advantage of Doctors, Part IV</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/22/health-insurance-companies-take-advantage-of-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-1889</link>
		<dc:creator>Amateur Economists &#187; Health Insurance Companies Take Advantage of Doctors, Part IV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amateureconomists.com/blogs/?p=298#comment-1889</guid>
		<description>[...] = 250; sr_adspace_type = &quot;graphic&quot;; sr_ad_new_window = true;    I previously posted about insurance companies and the EOB. I&#8217;ve been thinking more and more about this issue and have come to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] = 250; sr_adspace_type = &#8220;graphic&#8221;; sr_ad_new_window = true;    I previously posted about insurance companies and the EOB. I&#8217;ve been thinking more and more about this issue and have come to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amateur Economists &#187; Health Insurance Companies Take Advantage of Doctors, Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/22/health-insurance-companies-take-advantage-of-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-1642</link>
		<dc:creator>Amateur Economists &#187; Health Insurance Companies Take Advantage of Doctors, Part II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amateureconomists.com/blogs/?p=298#comment-1642</guid>
		<description>[...] Take Advantage of Doctors, Part II October 1, 2008 by J.C.     I&#8217;ve posted previously on how tough insurance companies can make it for doctors to collect their payments. Those of you in the profession know what I am talking about and are probably familiar with the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Take Advantage of Doctors, Part II October 1, 2008 by J.C.     I&#8217;ve posted previously on how tough insurance companies can make it for doctors to collect their payments. Those of you in the profession know what I am talking about and are probably familiar with the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JunkMD</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/22/health-insurance-companies-take-advantage-of-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-1466</link>
		<dc:creator>JunkMD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 01:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amateureconomists.com/blogs/?p=298#comment-1466</guid>
		<description>In response to the first comment, that may technically be true but it is not realistically true.  The system that has been created has the physician held hostage.  Sure, the doc can refuse to sign a contract with Medicare or Blue Cross, the 800 pound gorillas.  But if you are primary care doc and you do this, you just lost better than 80% of potential patients.  And, although a cash or retainer system is much better, until the physician can build a patient base, he or she will have to get a job doing something else because the practice will go bankrupt.  However, like I said, you are technically correct.  The emergence of retainer medicine is a classic example of your statement and it would be a much better system.  However, it takes a large patient base to develop enough relationships with patients that 300-500 of them would be willing to ante up $1000+ per year to see the doc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to the first comment, that may technically be true but it is not realistically true.  The system that has been created has the physician held hostage.  Sure, the doc can refuse to sign a contract with Medicare or Blue Cross, the 800 pound gorillas.  But if you are primary care doc and you do this, you just lost better than 80% of potential patients.  And, although a cash or retainer system is much better, until the physician can build a patient base, he or she will have to get a job doing something else because the practice will go bankrupt.  However, like I said, you are technically correct.  The emergence of retainer medicine is a classic example of your statement and it would be a much better system.  However, it takes a large patient base to develop enough relationships with patients that 300-500 of them would be willing to ante up $1000+ per year to see the doc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forHealth</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/22/health-insurance-companies-take-advantage-of-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-1438</link>
		<dc:creator>forHealth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amateureconomists.com/blogs/?p=298#comment-1438</guid>
		<description>Doctor&#039;s do have more power than the insurance companies. They don&#039;t have to sign those insurance contracts. Instead they can receive payment directly from the patients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doctor&#8217;s do have more power than the insurance companies. They don&#8217;t have to sign those insurance contracts. Instead they can receive payment directly from the patients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
