<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Health Insurance Companies Take Advantage of Doctors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/22/health-insurance-companies-take-advantage-of-doctors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/22/health-insurance-companies-take-advantage-of-doctors/</link>
	<description>Citizen Economists is an online economics magazine written by citizen journalists. These ordinary citizens provide reports and commentary on the current events affecting the economics of the fields they work in.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:44:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: unknown</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/22/health-insurance-companies-take-advantage-of-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-376059</link>
		<dc:creator>unknown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amateureconomists.com/blogs/?p=298#comment-376059</guid>
		<description>To comment about some of the conversation here regarding physicians offices taking a retainer up front for care would never work because simply most people don&#039;t have that kind of money sitting around and most importantly they would be in a hot mess when they were referred to other specialty physicians. In addition lab work and the worst case scenario they need urgent hospital care. I do not believe that would work because we can all sit here and think that as time goes on serious health issues can occur and that I believe is why healthcare is the way it is because all people should have insurance coverage for all of it. And if you outsource your billing you are saving lots of money and you don&#039;t need to worry about much except reports. That is why small business&#039;s like us are out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To comment about some of the conversation here regarding physicians offices taking a retainer up front for care would never work because simply most people don&#8217;t have that kind of money sitting around and most importantly they would be in a hot mess when they were referred to other specialty physicians. In addition lab work and the worst case scenario they need urgent hospital care. I do not believe that would work because we can all sit here and think that as time goes on serious health issues can occur and that I believe is why healthcare is the way it is because all people should have insurance coverage for all of it. And if you outsource your billing you are saving lots of money and you don&#8217;t need to worry about much except reports. That is why small business&#8217;s like us are out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Doe</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/22/health-insurance-companies-take-advantage-of-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-225048</link>
		<dc:creator>John Doe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amateureconomists.com/blogs/?p=298#comment-225048</guid>
		<description>I have been in the health care field and a provider for 20 years.  I wish I could tell you everything I know about the game.  Our clinic has had one raise from insurance companies in 15 years.  They do not pay their bills and make it impossible for anyone to do this for long.  Most doctors burn out.  The insurance companies are experts at getting the patients mad at the MD who has not been paid for their services.  They even succesfuly get them to file complaints against the doctor, and change doctors, and it starts all over again.  If you file any regulatory complaints - no referals.  They break the law every day.  They never pay late fee&#039;s or interest as required by law.  If you file a complaint about it they amp up getting patients to file complaints against you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been in the health care field and a provider for 20 years.  I wish I could tell you everything I know about the game.  Our clinic has had one raise from insurance companies in 15 years.  They do not pay their bills and make it impossible for anyone to do this for long.  Most doctors burn out.  The insurance companies are experts at getting the patients mad at the MD who has not been paid for their services.  They even succesfuly get them to file complaints against the doctor, and change doctors, and it starts all over again.  If you file any regulatory complaints &#8211; no referals.  They break the law every day.  They never pay late fee&#8217;s or interest as required by law.  If you file a complaint about it they amp up getting patients to file complaints against you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen Economists &#187; Reforming Healthcare &#38; Taking On Big Pharma: An E-Interview &#38; Reader Q&#38;A with S.J. Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/22/health-insurance-companies-take-advantage-of-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-2049</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen Economists &#187; Reforming Healthcare &#38; Taking On Big Pharma: An E-Interview &#38; Reader Q&#38;A with S.J. Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amateureconomists.com/blogs/?p=298#comment-2049</guid>
		<description>[...] class-action lawsuits by providers against insurance companies are a good solution to balance the inequity of power insurance companies wield in the current healthcare climate? Or does this merely clog the judicial system and become a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] class-action lawsuits by providers against insurance companies are a good solution to balance the inequity of power insurance companies wield in the current healthcare climate? Or does this merely clog the judicial system and become a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amateur Economists &#187; Health Insurance Companies Take Advantage of Doctors, Part IV</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/22/health-insurance-companies-take-advantage-of-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-1889</link>
		<dc:creator>Amateur Economists &#187; Health Insurance Companies Take Advantage of Doctors, Part IV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amateureconomists.com/blogs/?p=298#comment-1889</guid>
		<description>[...] = 250; sr_adspace_type = &quot;graphic&quot;; sr_ad_new_window = true;    I previously posted about insurance companies and the EOB. I&#8217;ve been thinking more and more about this issue and have come to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] = 250; sr_adspace_type = &#8220;graphic&#8221;; sr_ad_new_window = true;    I previously posted about insurance companies and the EOB. I&#8217;ve been thinking more and more about this issue and have come to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amateur Economists &#187; Health Insurance Companies Take Advantage of Doctors, Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/22/health-insurance-companies-take-advantage-of-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-1642</link>
		<dc:creator>Amateur Economists &#187; Health Insurance Companies Take Advantage of Doctors, Part II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amateureconomists.com/blogs/?p=298#comment-1642</guid>
		<description>[...] Take Advantage of Doctors, Part II October 1, 2008 by J.C.     I&#8217;ve posted previously on how tough insurance companies can make it for doctors to collect their payments. Those of you in the profession know what I am talking about and are probably familiar with the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Take Advantage of Doctors, Part II October 1, 2008 by J.C.     I&#8217;ve posted previously on how tough insurance companies can make it for doctors to collect their payments. Those of you in the profession know what I am talking about and are probably familiar with the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JunkMD</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/22/health-insurance-companies-take-advantage-of-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-1466</link>
		<dc:creator>JunkMD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 01:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amateureconomists.com/blogs/?p=298#comment-1466</guid>
		<description>In response to the first comment, that may technically be true but it is not realistically true.  The system that has been created has the physician held hostage.  Sure, the doc can refuse to sign a contract with Medicare or Blue Cross, the 800 pound gorillas.  But if you are primary care doc and you do this, you just lost better than 80% of potential patients.  And, although a cash or retainer system is much better, until the physician can build a patient base, he or she will have to get a job doing something else because the practice will go bankrupt.  However, like I said, you are technically correct.  The emergence of retainer medicine is a classic example of your statement and it would be a much better system.  However, it takes a large patient base to develop enough relationships with patients that 300-500 of them would be willing to ante up $1000+ per year to see the doc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to the first comment, that may technically be true but it is not realistically true.  The system that has been created has the physician held hostage.  Sure, the doc can refuse to sign a contract with Medicare or Blue Cross, the 800 pound gorillas.  But if you are primary care doc and you do this, you just lost better than 80% of potential patients.  And, although a cash or retainer system is much better, until the physician can build a patient base, he or she will have to get a job doing something else because the practice will go bankrupt.  However, like I said, you are technically correct.  The emergence of retainer medicine is a classic example of your statement and it would be a much better system.  However, it takes a large patient base to develop enough relationships with patients that 300-500 of them would be willing to ante up $1000+ per year to see the doc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forHealth</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/22/health-insurance-companies-take-advantage-of-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-1438</link>
		<dc:creator>forHealth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amateureconomists.com/blogs/?p=298#comment-1438</guid>
		<description>Doctor&#039;s do have more power than the insurance companies. They don&#039;t have to sign those insurance contracts. Instead they can receive payment directly from the patients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doctor&#8217;s do have more power than the insurance companies. They don&#8217;t have to sign those insurance contracts. Instead they can receive payment directly from the patients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

