<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robotics in Surgery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/08/03/robotics-in-surgery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/08/03/robotics-in-surgery/</link>
	<description>Citizen Economists is an online economics magazine written by citizen journalists. These ordinary citizens provide reports and commentary on the current events affecting the economics of the fields they work in.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:28:33 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J.L.</title>
		<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/08/03/robotics-in-surgery/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>J.L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amateureconomists.com/blogs/?p=200#comment-396</guid>
		<description>Dr. J.C.,

Da Vinci machines are awesome. If it worked well, no surgeon in their right mind would resist it.

You see, one of the hazards of surgery is what we call a &quot;sharps injury&quot;. This is where you accidentally cut your finger with a scalpel or suture needle while performing surgery. This is a big deal, because if the patient you are operating on has HIV, Hepatitis C, etc... the surgeon could get infected because there may be patient&#039;s blood on the scalpel/suture needle. 

With davinci, the risk of getting HIV/Hep C from a patient is eliminated.

So, why aren&#039;t all urologists/surgeons using da vinci? Cost is a major factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. J.C.,</p>
<p>Da Vinci machines are awesome. If it worked well, no surgeon in their right mind would resist it.</p>
<p>You see, one of the hazards of surgery is what we call a &#8220;sharps injury&#8221;. This is where you accidentally cut your finger with a scalpel or suture needle while performing surgery. This is a big deal, because if the patient you are operating on has HIV, Hepatitis C, etc&#8230; the surgeon could get infected because there may be patient&#8217;s blood on the scalpel/suture needle. </p>
<p>With davinci, the risk of getting HIV/Hep C from a patient is eliminated.</p>
<p>So, why aren&#8217;t all urologists/surgeons using da vinci? Cost is a major factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
